Arquette looks babacious in this! - A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors (1987) Discussion

[–] catsidhe (1649) 6 years ago

I've always thought her lovely. And yet Rosanna's the one with a song named after her.

reply

[–] bigbadwolf666 (4707) 6 years ago

I've always thought Patricia has been extremely beautiful. But even lovelier in these early films.
Though Rosanna isnt ugly. I dont think there's comparison. You might think I'm crazy but I used to think it was her mother. lol. Patricia is definitely the hottest from all the Arquettes and though I like Nicolas Cage. Here he showed flaw.

reply

[–] catsidhe (1649) 6 years ago

Rosanna isn't ugly, but she has a rodent thing going on with her face that none of her siblings have.

Oh lawwwwd, Patricia Arquette in Lost Highway...! ❤️

reply

[–] bigbadwolf666 (4707) 6 years ago

Yea i thought so too! Though I've always admired her breast.
To me she looked hottest in Point of No return.
I really liked that movie.

I always thought David was douche for not making it with the very hot Courtney.

lol. For me its Stigmata. Whenever I see Arquette in it I lose my entire mind.

reply

[–] GreenGoblinsOck8 (7983) 6 years ago

I find your statement offensive since she was only like 13 years old in this. She was a cute little girl in it but attractive or hot is kind of creepy to say about a 13 year old. Sorry. Just looked up the actress and she was about 18 or 19 when she filmed this movie. Looked much younger than that. I thought everyone except Taryn looked 13 or so.

reply

[–] bigbadwolf666 (4707) 6 years ago

but what if I was the same age or younger?

reply

[–] GreenGoblinsOck8 (7983) 6 years ago

That might be fine. Though I have to admit I am against underage sex.

reply

[–] bigbadwolf666 (4707) 6 years ago

Saying she's fine doesnt mean I'm having sex with her.

reply

[–] GreenGoblinsOck8 (7983) 6 years ago

You said her boobs were good and that she was babelicious. That means you want to have sex with her.

reply

[–] bigbadwolf666 (4707) 6 years ago

lol. No I didnt. I said Babacious.
and saying she's fine, lovely, and beautiful doesnt mean I'm saying I want to have sex with her or that I am.
Regardless of sex Mrs. Arquette is one Fine Beauty Masterpiece!

reply

[–] Enigmaticocean77 (2490) 5 years ago

13? Sorry to break it to you but she was 20 when she made this movie.

reply

[–] GreenGoblinsOck8 (7983) 5 years ago

I guess she looked younger than that to me. I apologize. Though maybe it is also that she is supposed to be an underage teen in the movie. I didn't think she looked older than 14 in the movie.

reply

[–] Enigmaticocean77 (2490) 5 years ago

Ah, don't apologize to me. I'm not the one who said the a 20 year old who looked like a 13 year old was babacious 😉

...and what the hell does babacious mean anyway? Did he mean bablicious? Or is babacious some kind of hip slang word than my 40+ year old self isn't aware of?

reply

[–] BillySlater (4281) 5 years ago

Patricia was 18/19 in this. I don´t see her looking 14 apart from the fact she is short. She was a total babe in her younger days.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Enigmaticocean77 (2490) 5 years ago

She was cute too, but I preferred Lisa Wilcox in the Dream Child- even if the movie was a, um, a nightmare 😁

reply

[–] bobbydallas (8681) 5 years ago

yup

reply