I've heard a lot of praise for Dalton for Bond, but I found is performance very plain. He was just too dark, now okay Roger Moore's Bond got to jokey, if you get my drift but his films was very entertaining. Dalton was simply boring, as we've all heard the production for Living Daylights wanted Prosnan, also Prosnan wanted to be bond. However Remington Steel squashed any hopes for Bond, so they went for second choice Dalton ,too serious & too boring. I've got nothing against Dalton a talented actor but just doesn't suit the secret agent atmosphere. I just wouldn't what it would be like if Prosnan took the role early.
I don't know how anyone could say Timothy Dalton was an awful James Bond. In a world where there was George Lazenby, calling Dalton awful is simply ludicrous. And I don't even think Lazenby was awful. He was wooden, but alright. He's still the weakest of the Bond actors however.
Dalton brought intensity and danger to a role that was sorely lacking. I like the Roger Moore Bond films, but they'd slipped into camp. For God's sake, they dubbed in a Tarzan yell and The Beach Boys for God's sake. Towards the end, it looked like Moore was doing everything in his power not to look at the camera and wink.
Dalton, from the moment we first see him, is totally in the role. It takes him no time to become the character. Even when I first saw the movies, that was the first impression I got. There was no stutter step. He was there and I forgot about Roger Moore from the start of his entrance to the very end.
There's two key sequences that totally cement Dalton's Bond as, IMO, the best of the bunch. The first is the scene where it seems he's going to kill Pushkin. The whole sequence is suspenseful, and REAL. Ripping off the robe of Pushkin's wife to distract the guard is totally brutal, but it's what you'd expect from Her Majesty's greatest agent.
The second is Dalton in the scene after Saunders has been killed. The look on his face right before he pops that balloon is pure rage. The bitter delivery of "I got the message." is flawless.
Roger Moore's Bond sometimes seemed like if he didn't have gadgets, he'd be dead. You never got that vibe with Dalton. Sure he drove the tricked out Aston Martin and whistled with the keychain, but Dalton's version didn't seem to have to rely solely on them for survival. Dalton's Bond was presented as the Queen's best agent because he was. He could win with or without gadgets.
Also, we got to see Bond be an AGENT again. His gut instinct tells him not to kill Kara. Then he pieces together the plot from there. First and foremost, Bond is a spy. Sometimes in Moore's efforts, you wouldn't know it. It was, bed a woman, get intel, bed a woman, get intel. The pieces just fell his way. Dalton believably had to work at it.
Another gripe I hear is that he's weak when it comes to the ladies. I challenge anyone with that complaint to find a more spontaneous love scene than the one where Bond and Tara get romantic in Afghanistan. The anger in Kara, the hitting him with a pillow, her calling him a "Back end of horse." His bluntness"Are you calling me a horse's @ss?" And the laughter that follows is extremely REAL
And I particularly like Dalton's cynical reaction at the beginning when Saunders says he's telling M Bond missed. Dalton's reaction, that M may fire him and he'll thank him for it, is classic Ian Fleming. James Bond was often disillusioned in Fleming's books. But he stuck with it because, while he hated the job, he couldn't live without it. He's her majesty's killer. The job isn't just fun and games. Dalton, thus far, is the only actor who's portrayed the Bond that does sometimes hate what he does.
I saw Dalton long before reading the books. I thought he was good, and that was that. Then I read all the Fleming books. Then I went through Gardner, and Benson, and the one-offs, Colonel Sun and Devil May Care, and then Deaver's. Then I watched all the films in sequence again.
When the credits start, and list _________ as Ian Fleming's James Bond 007, Dalton's is the only name that truly matches that description. Connery is great, Andi like all the actors, but Dalton is #1.
I can see people's points about Dalton's performance. He did play Bond more mortal like the books but is that good for the cinema screen. The Living Daylights is a good realistic bond film, what let it down was Dalton being in it. The transformation from Moore's bond to Dalton's bond was too sudden, maybe Brosnan would have been right replacement to Moore's bond because i felt Brosnan's bond was more of a younger Roger Moore type bond, somewhat physical like Connery aswell.
I do like Daniel Craig's 007 he does play Bond more mortal, but Craig's bond films involves alot of character development which makes it interesting.
I like Roger's films but it appeared that Octopussy & Moonraker were both a joke and them films killed the James Bond image. A View To A Kill is a decent Bond film but Roger looked far too old. Maybe he should left on a high with For Your Eyes Only.
"I can see people's points about Dalton's performance. He did play Bond more mortal like the books but is that good for the cinema screen."
I think it was. You're trying to have it both ways. You're praising Daniel Craig for his more realistic portrayal, but you're faulting Dalton for doing the same thing in the same breath.
There's no lack of character development in either of Dalton's Bond films. In TLD, we see a Bond that's tired and burned-out, and in LTK, we see just how far he's willing to go to bring justice to those that wronged his friends.
In reality, LTK is what Diamonds Are Forever should have been, and could have, with better writing and a performance from Sean Connery that wasn't so damn disinterested. I mean, he's facing off against the guy who just murdered his wife and they're justing having parlour conversation. Really James? Guess she didn't mean that much to you, huh?
I think Dalton was absolutely excellent. He was well qualified to do his tasks, but on the other hand he never minced words and said things the way he felt them (even to superiors). Mountain Man
He was the great promise after an era 1 1/2 decade long of scrapboard thick characterisation of Bond! If he would have been more lucky, able to make a third, he would have shown us a fantastic Bond!