It wasn't the worst of the sequels. But also it wasn't the best. Somewhere in the middle. What I will say is, it stands out amongst the other sequels. For a couple of reasons.
First reason is Freddy can do things in this movie he can't do in any other movie. Like possess people. Or like when he attacks people at the pool party, without anybody being asleep. I know it was only the second movie, so it was maybe trying to re-establish things, but it didn't all work. So they went back to making Freddy a dream demon for the remaining movies.
Second reason is, the other sequels had some level of continuing the story. Nancy came back in the third movie. And those that survived each movie, were usually in the next ones. Which gave most of the series some level of continuity. It wasn't until Freddy's Dead that they had all new characters at the start of a movie.
I think this explains some of the hate. After the second one, you never found out what happened to Jesse, Lisa or Grady. It's like they didn't ever exist. It feels like a spin-off rather than a sequel. Like you could've replaced Freddy with another character, called it; "Further Adventures On Elm Street" and it wouldn't have changed anything that much. Dream Warriors would be considered the first true sequel.
reply
share