Worst special effects ever seen in a big-budget production
It has my vote. What say you?
Hmm that's a good question, and I'm not entirely sure. I think all the composite shorts are universally terrible. But the mutated guilds navigator is a great practical effect. Some of it's uses by Lynch strike me as rather odd and poorly devised...but otherwise, I'm still enthralled by that thing.
Zagreus waits at the end of the world, For Zagreus is the end of the world.
I have to respectfully disagree with you about the guild navigator. Though the concept was slightly interesting (like the nose or mouth or whatever it was that exhaled spice gas) I found the execution subpar. It looked like a rubber puppet with somewhat movable arms, nothing more. The Eraserhead baby was far more expressive. In fact, all the effects in Eraserhead were vastly superior (like the stop-motion animation of the worm dancing around and opening its mouth) -- and cost an infinitesimal fraction of those in Dune.
I will agree that the Eraserhead baby was a vastly superior effect. 90% of the time it feels like a real thing.
The Guild navigator is an impressive and unique spectacle. But it is not always shot in ways that complement the effect, and frequently it looks like a rubber puppet, you're right. And it's weird vagina mouth never looks convincing.
I think had it been shot with a little lower lighting, and not stretching it quite as much with the mouth effects or that ridiculous scene where it "folds space" Like what the *beep* was that? What were they thinking?!
Zagreus waits at the end of the world, For Zagreus is the end of the world.
Yeah, that space-folding scene was utterly pathetic. And it could have been a highlight of the movie, as the whole concept was ripe for unbridled creativity. Extremely disappointing.
share
Amen!
π
They are bad but I'd take any bad '80s special effects over any of the CGI crap fests of the past 20 years.
I partly agree with you about CGI. There have been good and subtle uses of it from time to time, but it is probably the biggest tool by which talentless filmmakers and mercenary producers take the once-great art form of cinema and turn it into nothing more than an amusement park ride.
Yes, I meant bad CGI of course : I'm not THAT much of a retrograde...
The thing is that bad practical effect, as bad as they can be they still retain some charm for me.
Bad CGI is just bad, no charm at all so I'll never go back to a movie that has bad CGI: but I can still go back to Dune, as bad as it is it's still charming for me (although I'm only watching the big fan-edit now, that surely helps !)
It depends on the CGI.
shareDear God,
Listen, this was made in 1984, when it's watched in Blu-ray it's going to look *beep* I even cringed watching it in 3D, but I remember watching it in 1984 when it first came out, and it was the dogs bollux.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain .... Time to die
It's not uncommon for someone to have liked something more back when he/she saw it for the first time. It doesn't change the fact that the effects were dreadful, even by 1984 standards. We're not talking about the 1920s here. So many advances in visual effects had been made by the time Dune was filmed that there is simply no excuse for them to have been that bad.
Amen, Bro!
π
Some of them are bad. Would be nice if they had a touch up to improve where they ran out of money. Brad Dourifs entrance scene is terrible in regards to the special effects
Regretfully, it did have poor special effects. The vehicles that drove out of the spice harvester, for example, looked like toys.
shareWorst or close to it.
share
It has my vote also. They were TERRIBLE, even for 1984! A total embarrassment!
π
I remember the first Terminator used an obviously fake mannequin to pass off as Schwarzenegger (when he cuts out him damaged eye). Looking back I was surprised the time wasn't taken to make it look more realistic. Getting back to Dune, it had its problems - the scenes at the spice harvester with the ATVs that looked like toys.
share