Stunt Penis


For over 20 years now fans and perverts obsessed with Tom Cruise have watched this movie thinking that if you pause the movie at just the right time, you can see his penis.. this line even made it into "Scream". Well, now, the truth has come out. Tom was quoted saying that he has never done frontal nudity and that the frontal nudity in "All the Right Movies" was the work of a body double.
Just thought I would pass this information along to the people here (in case anybody reading this board are fans and or perverts obsessed with Tom Cruise and or his penis)


"Between emotion and response falls the shadow"
~T.S. Eliot~

reply

[deleted]

Yah, anyone who watches that clip can see clearly that there is no stunt double used. When they first start taking her top off, the camera cuts away to a close up of her breasts and you think "Okay, maybe they DID use a stunt double." But it isn't long before it pulls back to a long shot that shows her face and her exposed breasts, so there's just absolutely no question it is her.

reply

If I was going to use a stunt penis (great name btw), I'd at least get Marky Mark's from Boogie Nights.

reply

I don't even know about the movie but this message had me laughing so hard it took 10 minutes before I could see through the tears to finish it. As soon as I saw the words "fans and perverts" I lost it. What a funny way to start a thread. Bravo and thanks for the laughs!!!

reply

[deleted]

It was his. He wasn't a big enough star at that point to demand or to refuse anything. Also, if you blink you miss it. It was hardly worth all the time and $ he spent having those three seconds clipped. (Ah, but some us still have the original VHS.)

reply

You are absolutely correct. Tom was still a newcomer when this film was made. He hardly had the clout to make any demands. It wasn't until "Top Gun" made him a superstar that he had the power to have a "no nudity" clause put into his contracts for every movie he has made since then. A decade earlier, Jan-Michael Vincent had a fit when Playboy Magazine ran a photo of his frontal nude scene from "Buster and Billie" in its annual "Sex in Cinema" issue. I once asked a friend of mine who worked for Playboy how the magazine was able to publish nude scenes from "legitimate" movies, and he told me that a photographer was dispatched to a theater showing the movie with the scene in question. After the day's final showing of the movie and the audience had gone home, the photographer paid the projectionist "bribe" money to screen the movie again, and pause it when the desired scene appeared on the screen so the photographer could get the scene Playboy wanted. I was surprised the magazine didn't do this with the Cruise/Thompson scene from "All the Right Moves" but since the two actors at the time were hardly "stars", Playboy probably decided that scene was of minimal interest and passed on it.

reply

pause it when the desired scene appeared on the screen


Your 'friend' was pulling your leg. There was no pause feature. If film stock stops moving while inside a projector with a Xenon bulb, the frame would melt in short order, like this: https://youtu.be/lnQRXfjI664?t=71

High resolution photo stills were likely taken from film prints in a laboratory, not from pausing movies in theaters.

reply