...if any. This turd bombed at the domestic box office because it wasn't good enough to compete during the Golden Age of sci fi, then it got endless re-edits in a desperate attempt to fix this FUNDAMENTALLY flawed mess, yet Replicants can't see it is FAR from the great movie they insist it is because that goes against their faulty programming. If you think Blade Runner is good, you're probably a Replicant.
share*Usually, This being an exception.
shareIt's not for dummies, that's for sure!
shareGo watch some Transformers movies and let the adults discuss this one.
shareTransformers movies suck, child. And liking box office flops doesn't make you more adult or more intelligent.
shareLolz are you retarded? Of course Transformers suck donkey dick. But your obviously not intelligent enough to appreciate this great movie. A movie critizised for its slow pacing and lack of action. It later became an acclaimed cult film regarded as one of the all-time best science fiction films. Hailed for its production design depicting a decaying future, Blade Runner is a leading example of neo-noir cinema. Sorry that you don't get it kid!!
shareThanks for that predictable, cliched,' fanboy response. You sound exactly like the Reylos who swear the Star Warped Shequel Travesty is so great, male fans can't understand it.
shareWow, so your one of those sad little manbabys still butthurt over the sequels. Tell you what, Boomer: George Lucas killed star wars. TFA and TLJ had some flaws but they were an overall fun experience. No, and TESB wasn't the bestest ever Star wars.
shareTHANK PHILIP K. DICK AND THE SCREENWRITERS WHO ADAPTED HIS BOOK FOR THE LONGEVITY OF THIS TURD...A WEAK,BORING FILM WRAPPED AROUND FASCINATING IDEAS.
share