MovieChat Forums > Blade Runner (1982) Discussion > Directors And Other Artists On Blade Run...

Directors And Other Artists On Blade Runner


Steven Spielberg: "I thought Ridley [Scott, director of Blade Runner] painted a very bleak but brilliant vision of life on earth in a few years. It's kind of acid rain and sushi. In fact, it's coming true faster than most science fiction films come true. Blade Runner is almost upon us. It was ultranoir."



http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/10.06/spielberg_pr.html



Alex

reply

Terry Gilliam: "After The Fisher King, Richard LaGravenese who wrote the film, and I went to the studio with his script for Philip K Dick's A Scanner Darkly. Nobody's done a Dick novel right yet; Blade Runner was stunningly good, but Dick's idea was missing - that people were killing replicants to buy real animals. I saw how to make Scanner cheaply, and for it to be disturbing. But did the studio say, 'These two guys just made us our second-most profitable film of the year, let's give them the money to develop the idea?' No. I simply wasn't understanding the rules of this place called Hollywood."

Well it's more of a comment than a review but...

~little wing~

reply

that is kind of a weird thing to say. i don't think a central idea of DADoES was that people were killing replicants to buy real animals... that was an important part, but it wasn't the crux of the book, i didn't think so anyway. i think scott did a good job with blade runner. not in making it exactly like DADoES, but modifying it somewhat to make it a movie while still keeping the same feeling and some of the same central themes while adding some of his own.

anyway, let's see more quotes. sorry, i don't have any. where do you guys find stuff like this?

reply

It was merely an interpretation of the book. After reading DADoES, I was surprised how the film did NOT closely resemble the book. Central themes, characters and key points, yes, but the film is different.

In my opinion, Blade Runner was made to be bleak, but visually stunning. The book didn't give off that vibe. Scott's vision of HOW to portray the future was something unlike anything that had ever been seen before. After watching all the featurettes, interviews and special features on the multi-disk set, I'm even more astonished at what a masterpiece this film really is. It's simply amazing. The costuming detail alone blew my mind.

When it first came out in the early 80's, I think people were expecting something like Star Wars, since Harrison was known that way. The fact that the film was highly visual, with limited movie dialogue and haunting music....it was just way ahead of it's time. I don't think audiences at that time were in a mindset to appreciate what they saw. And Phillip K. Dick fans were probably upset at the departure from the novel.

When you think about it, it still looks pretty good today. There are some funny things that date the movie (Atari) but overall, it holds up well and is a compelling, atmospheric film that leaves a keen viewer haunted.



How DARE you kiss me?!?!
I don't like fast women....
and I HATE arrogant men.....

reply

If a film was made to portray all the ideas and concepts laid down in DADoES, it would have to be at least a trilogy (to which it does not lend itself) or a TV season (at least).

To get people to understand even the basic motivations of people acquiring live animals as status symbols would take 2 hours, then having your lives run by Penfield Mood Organs and Mercerism Virtual Reality Boxes to achieve union with Mercer is another 3 hours. Plus, the replicants in DADoES were wimpy.

DADoES is a head job, not an entertainment flick.

Blade Runner was the best meeting place between the two.

Humans scorn what they can't grasp, and suffer in their longing for it.

reply

I agree. There's no way Blade Runner would have been as successful if absolutely faithful to the book. Head job is one way to explain it. It definitely has some interesting concepts that worked well in the book but I don't see how the empathy box would have translated to the screen. Bladerunner made the book palatable.

How DARE you kiss me?!?!
I don't like fast women....
and I HATE arrogant men.....

reply

Maybe it's just me but what the hell does DADoES mean?

Cult Leader my minds frightening, I drink blood from a human skull like a Viking

reply

[deleted]

DADOES = Director Adored Droids Over Epic Story.







"Lófaszt, nehogy már. Te vagy a Blade ... Blade Runner"


reply

Dadoes = don't ask dudes obvious excluding stuff

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdTmT3wVBxM someone should remake hollywood

reply

Oh, ok thanks man.

Cult Leader my minds frightening, I drink blood from a human skull like a Viking

reply

[deleted]

hahahaha

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdTmT3wVBxM someone should remake hollywood

reply

This post has been deleted by the poster because the stupid IMDb computer posted it twice by mistake.

reply

When it first came out in the early 80's, I think people were expecting something like Star Wars, since Harrison was known that way. The fact that the film was highly visual, with limited movie dialogue and haunting music....it was just way ahead of it's time


It's look was original, and very much ahead of it's time. But the way Ridley Scott directed it, was not really ahead of it's time. His way of making "Blade Runner", had been done before. The difference is that people were not ready for something like "Blade Runner", because of it's bleak tone, dark atmosphere, and pessimistic look. During the 80's, alot of people were very optimistic.

It was a decade of celebration in a way. So a film like "Blade Runner" was not going to appeal to most peoples preference during that time. I also feel that the studio hurt the film to a certain degree. By adding in that annoying voice over, and happy ending that contradicted the rest of the film. If they let Ridley do what he wanted to do, then the film could of gotten a bit more love in my opinion. It might not of gotten RAVE reviews, but they wouldn't of been so mixed. Sadly, Ridley didn't have the clout that he has now. He wasn't on Spielberg's level, so he couldn't do what he wanted to do with this film.

Now in this decade, "Blade Runner" could be a big hit at the box office. And if hollywood had more faith in what it could do at the box office, then it might of made more money then "Saw 4" last year.


Last Films Seen:
Free Willy(1993)- 7/10
Bowling for Columbine(2002)- 8.5/10

reply

Terry directed the all time best sci-fi movie ever made, so his comments seem respectable for me.

reply

All time best Sci-fi movie? Incorrect.

reply

Oh wow, imagine if Terry Gilliam had made A Scanner Darkly...

reply

Mamoru Oshii (Ghost In A shell): People tend to classify my movies as cyberpunk fictions but I personally don't think they are. There are some films that I really enjoy such as Blade Runner, and they may have been helpful in making my movies to a certain degree, but I think many filmmakers consider so other than just myself. When you create a film dealing with humans and cyborgs, you have no choice but to refer back to Ridley Scott's Blade Runner, as this movie is probably the foundation of movies with this theme.

reply


I always wondered why no Anime directors were not interviewed for the box set, since some anime is influenced by Blade Runner The two obvious ones that reference Blade Runner are Ghost In The Shell & Akira.


The Trifecta of Cinematic Evil: Michael Bay > Uwe Boll > M. Night Shyamalan

reply

Christopher Nolan: "I have always been a huge fan of Ridley Scott and certainly when I was a kid. Alien, Blade Runner just blew me away because they created these extraordinary worlds that were just completely immersive. I was also an enormous Stanley Kubrick fan for similar reasons."

And this:

Before the shooting began, Christopher Nolan invited the whole film crew to a private screening of Blade Runner (1982). After the film he said to the whole crew, "This is how we're going to make Batman."

reply

Christopher Nolan: "I have always been a huge fan of Ridley Scott and certainly when I was a kid. Alien, Blade Runner just blew me away because they created these extraordinary worlds that were just completely immersive. I was also an enormous Stanley Kubrick fan for similar reasons."

And this:

Before the shooting began, Christopher Nolan invited the whole film crew to a private screening of Blade Runner (1982). After the film he said to the whole crew, "This is how we're going to make Batman."


Thats also why I love Blade Runner and basically everything by Kubrick. Because they create these worlds that you don't usually see in real life but you feel like you're there just by watching the movie. When it's finished you feel like you've stepped out of that world and then you enter reality. lol

And also, Nolan made the entire film crew watch Heat, and then told them that is how they are going to make The Dark Knight. I guess for similar reasons

If you piss in your pants you can only stay warm for so long

reply

Before the shooting began, Christopher Nolan invited the whole film crew to a private screening of Blade Runner (1982). After the film he said to the whole crew, "This is how we're going to make Batman."

They weren't very successful then.

THE INQUISITOR
Movies, Culture, Opinion and more...

http://robertod.wordpress.com/

reply

Nolan's brother, the scriptwriter, is also a fan of Blade Runner.


Sara Maitland quoting Stanley Kubrick: "He complaint about Blade Runner, that if it was that difficult to determine who was a replicant - why did it matter? Why do they have to be hunted down? If robots are made by us and act like us, why are they not our children?"




Alex

reply

[deleted]

Ha Genius! 2001 is a far superior film on A.I. by a far superior director. Blade Runner = not as great as people praise it to be.

reply

if it was that difficult to determine who was a replicant - why did it matter?


Philip K. Dick's entire literary career was about the problem of determining what was real.

Also , the problem of evil.


"Everyone is ignorant, only on different subjects". Will Rogers (1879-1935)

reply

Richard Linklater (A Scanner Darkly): "My opinions on previous Philip K. Dick adaptations are probably really similar to everybody else's. I think we all rally around 'Blade Runner'. I like the original cut of 'Blade Runner' more than the Director's Cut -- the so-called 'Director's Cut'. I liked the narrator. I hear there's a new DVD coming out with three different versions, and I'm waiting for that, because the original cut has become unavailable.
It's more in the film noir tradition to have a narrated voice -- and you kind of need it to pull the elements together. It's not cheesy or bad in any way. It's classic. But I saw it in the theater at the time, too, so maybe it's just special to me."



How about them apples?! That's Linklater and Del Toro vs. Frank Darabont.

Alex

reply

David Fincher: The voiceover in Blade Runner, if you listen to it, sounds like a guy reading prose while he's sitting on the john.



Alex


reply

Chris Cunningham: "Ridley said some time ago that with Blade Runner, for him, the design was the statement. Well, for me," says Cunningham, "the atmosphere was the statement. I can't think of another film that has such a strong atmosphere. So melancholy, and the strangest feeling of nostalgia for a place and time that never was."


One of my favorite quotes about Blade Runner.


Alex

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Is that true about Nolan, that he showed TDK cast Blade Runner and said "Like this"?

Not TDK but BB.

reply


ahem, *beep* David Fincher!!

that is all...


The Trifecta of Cinematic Evil: Michael Bay > Uwe Boll > M. Night Shyamalan

reply

"So melancholy, and the strangest feeling of nostalgia for a place and time that never was."

My NEW favorite quote on "Blade Runner.' Perfect.

reply

Seconded! Cunningham's a classy bloak. Where is that long awaited feature from him already!?

Would you happen to have any... flan?
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=194240

reply

More about nostalgia for a time and place that could be.

reply

Chris Cunningham: "Ridley said some time ago that with Blade Runner, for him, the design was the statement. Well, for me," says Cunningham, "the atmosphere was the statement. I can't think of another film that has such a strong atmosphere. So melancholy, and the strangest feeling of nostalgia for a place and time that never was."

Wow that's exactly how I feel about it, he summed up my feelings perfectly. Great quote.

reply

Wow that's exactly how I feel about it, he summed up my feelings perfectly. Great quote.

It is! The world of Blade Runner (which is a hybrid of the old and the new) doesn't seem to be able to let go of the past and oozes a kind of beautiful decay. Combine this with the never-ending rain, the compassionate sounds of Vangelis (another fusion of the old and the new), the themes of mortality and aging, and it could explain what Cunningham is talking about.




Alex

reply

David Fincher: The voiceover in Blade Runner, if you listen to it, sounds like a guy reading prose while he's sitting on the john.


The great David Fincher is 100% correct.



Last Films Seen:
Free Willy(1993)- 7/10
Bowling for Columbine(2002)- 8.5/10

reply

Mark Leckey (video artist and professor of film): The film that has had the greatest influence on me is Blade Runner (1982, directed by Ridley Scott). I love this film for the same reasons I love Roxy Music: they share a sense of yearning for the past and the future, for another place and another time, but it’s flattened out, so everything seems to occur at the same time in the same space. In Blade Runner you really feel that everything and everyone is piled on top of each other, mounting up like wreckage at the feet of the angel of history.




Alex

reply

Andy and Larry Wachowski: Blade Runner was a benchmark science fiction film, a masterpiece. Of course there's influence. But we were like the only guys who liked that movie when we saw it, everyone else hated it.



Alex

reply