As this one proved, they REALLY played off each other well.
sharethat's funny, some mention here that they hardly have any scenes between each other in this, i'm surprised to hear they weren't in more movies together, you just get that impression watching the cast of old movies packed with actors from the greatest generation, on this though, why in the world would anyone make a movie about dog fights, is that fair to call it? i had to look away so much that i didn't get a grasp of the movie, though it would have been satisfying to watch bronson waste them. i noticed after a while i had seen it years ago, and realised now this reminded alot of "chato's land" as already mentioned, a man on the run in the wilderness with a pack hunting him. judging by the cover i thought it would just be marvin and bronson and was surprised all the co stars it had, again just as in chato's land, overall this doesn't seem like a bad movie, but considering the subject its unwatchable.
see through shirt leaving buttons up,
do you need to show off what others aint got,
and if it aint real it dont count,
groovy mood feelin alright,
as you shine like a neon sign on saturday night,
as you brought your boobies out in the light,
led me by your hand anywhere,
youre a D-vitamin i need in a gloomy atmosphere.
Both their movie debuts was in You're In The Navy Now. But I recall reading Bronson didn't enjoy making The Dirty Dozen because off Marvin's booze problems and only agreed to do this movie because Marvin promised to not drink as heavily. Given that this flopped I don't think producers were lining up to cast them together again.
shareMore of a pity that Bronson and Eastwood didn't make one together.
share