Ending (Spoilers)
I'm confused about the ending. The parents just blow up. What was the purpose of that ending? I'm not gonna make any assumptions. Someone, please explain.
shareI'm confused about the ending. The parents just blow up. What was the purpose of that ending? I'm not gonna make any assumptions. Someone, please explain.
shareI don't think it's meant to be over analyzed. It's just a very funny and weird ending, which is perfect for a very funny and weird film. A little note, I remember the ending upsetting me as a kid. It's kind of a dark ending, with the kid being all alone.
shareI saw this as a young adult in 1981. I thought the ending was great - so unconventional and daring - the parents actually got what they deserved! Too many films like this end with "it was just a dream," which is a cheat - no one should do that in films anymore.
Go to
http://orangecow.org/pythonet/bandits4.html
and scroll down to the question of why Gilliam killed off the parents. I don't always trust director's statements of why they did things, by the way.
After reading through this thread, it seems a lot of people are because there's been a few different answers that all make sense.
I suppose you take from the ending whatever you want. I just always thought it was Terry Gilliam's way of saying "Forget Hollywood endings, life's just shit sometimes"😂
Why has nobody mentioned the shoes that are left behind? They must symbolize something - maybe that the kid is also given the gift of life but should choose to walk a different path to his parents.
share