MovieChat Forums > Alien (1979) Discussion > I've tried to like Alien, but just can't...

I've tried to like Alien, but just can't get into it.


I feel like I'm the only person in the world who doesn't like this movie. I'll give credit where credit is due because it's shot very well and the production design is excellent, but on the whole I've always been disappointed with it.

I'll probably get flak for this but the biggest problem I have with the movie is the inconsistent special effects. The famous chest bursting scene is set up very well and John Hurt sells it perfectly but when it eventually comes out I couldn't help but chuckle a little bit because it looks like what it is, a plastic puppet that is being twisted on a stick by a stage hand. Then when it scurries off, it also looks like what it is, a plastic puppet being pulled along on a track that is hidden in the table. I think the same thing about E.T when he is trying to get to the ship before it takes off, it's pretty poorly done in an otherwise decent movie.

I might be coming down a little hard on the movie because I'm well aware that Scott was being rushed for time and resources when shooting a lot of these effects sequences, but essentially it's an A movie that settled for second. The scene where Ash has his head knocked off and his wooden arms are flailing around everywhere is pretty laughable and the god awful jump cut scene following it is basically unforgivable, there was another way to shoot that scene without resorting to an obvious jump cut.

Which brings be to my next point about the Alien, which for the most part is shot well, keeping it in the shadows and showing only certain sections of its figure was a good move on Scott's behalf. However there are shots that really show that it's just a man in a suit and when it gets blasted out of the air lock it gave it away. All of these things broke my sense of danger and suspense when watching it and I've had conversations with people online who chastise me for judging a movie on its special effects, but I think its warranted. The Alien is the draw card of the film and if you can't sell it with the special effects then there's a problem.

Obviously I'm in the minority here as people have loved this movie for nearly 40 years but I've re-watched this film several times since I first saw it in 1998 and still feel the same way. As they say, first impressions last and those dodgy special effects really stick out like a sore thumb to me and prevent me from feeling the same suspense and terror that the characters are.

reply

One might guess (accurately) that I'm a fan of this movie... And that would be correct - I love every aspect of it.

Having said that - I have the deepest respect for all of you that don't like it, regardless of your reason.

I first saw it when I was 12 years old when the movie was more than a decade old. But the sfx still held. So every re-watch I'm primed by my first impression and the sfx don't bother me. I believe the sfx to be A-class standard for its time and not a result of a tight budget or time schedule. Just look at any other gore and monster sfx from that era and you'll find they're not any better. However, in 1998 we had (I'm assuming) all experienced the Jurassic Park paradigm shift and new benchmark of sfx which simply made all prior monster films less plausible.

Alien is also quite slow (not necessarily in it's time but definitely compared to 1998, and compared to present times it's basically comatose) which doesn't sit well with everyone. It's also a bit weird that the monster moves very slowly but manages to "get 'em all"...

The "guy in a suit" topic seems just as ancient as the movie itself, but it is of course important for the film experience. As you point out - it is the final scenes that reveals it. It would have been difficult to give the audience a resolution without showing that the whole monster is sucked out into outer space and blasted away without revealing the guy in a suit. Then again - it could have been illustrated without showing the whole creature.

I like that you share your feelings about the film in a very objective manner - it opens up for a good conversation about it. I have no problem with anyone that doesn't like one of my favorite films. In fact, it only proves that no piece of art can speak to all human beings, which is the beauty of it if you ask me.

Peace, love and escapism to all!
Xeno

reply

Well, you have to suspend belief just a bit. For example, the chest buster running away obviously looked like a cheap 1950's arcade racing horse on rails, and was embarassing. But otherwise, given the technology at the time, and especially the script, it is pretty awesome.

reply

I'm generally not a big fan of alien movies, but this is one I do enjoy.

reply

I turned 19 in late 1979 and even then I didn’t think the movie was so great. It was ok, but I’ve never watched it again until now.

It’s actually kind of boring.

Event Horizon is my favorite sci-fi/horror film.

reply

Agreed. Saw it once and never cared to watch it again. In contrast to John Carpenter's The Thing which I've re-watched countless times and even the Alien-derivative Pitch Black.

reply

Oh well, your loss.

reply

it's a boring film.

reply