MovieChat Forums > Coming Home (1978) Discussion > Champion's both the anti-war movement AN...

Champion's both the anti-war movement AND adultery.


What a gross film this really is, in the end. I have no problem with adultery in movies when reflected realistically. But when it is packaged the way it is in this film, it is very irresponsible. The affair is shown as a loving moment, while the marriage is shown as an act of duty. Sally never repents or regrets her affair. For the briefest of moments she notes that she has never been unfaithful, but within minutes she is kissing the guy anyway. At the end of the film, the director conveniently shows Bob at his weakest, going out and getting drunk instead of staying home with his wife. Therefore, we are left to feel "ok" about him killing himself and Sally and Luke being free to remain lovers. Sally never apologizes, and we never see her reaction to her husband being driven to suicide. I hope her character would have been rightly devastated at what a raw deal she gave the man! As I said, this romanticizing of adultery is sick and irresponsible.

Added to this, of course, is the subtext of anti-war activism. We get touches of it throughout the movie, but it never is the main focus for the majority of the film. But in the last 10 minutes, it is as if Nancy Dowd suddenly realized she wanted to really stick her anti-war politics into the fray as well. So, we get a completely tacked-on scene of Luke attending what I guess was a debate at a local High School or College, which gives him his chance to make his impassioned anti-war speech. To be fair, it isn't nearly as heavy handed as what Oliver Stone would unleash ten years later with BORN ON THE FOURTH OF JULY. Nevertheless, it is completely unrelated to the main plot of the film, and is only there to delight the left wing masses.

You know, with a few tweaks, this could have been a classic love story. Instead of her husband, it could have been her brother gone off to war that leads her to seek a role at the VA hospital. With that, I might have really enjoyed the film. As it is, I find it repulsive in its message that an affair can take place without consequences- sorry, next!

reply

You say "It CHAMPIONS".

I say "It SHOWS".

Big difference.

The film did not "invent" the anti-war movement-it existed.
It did not invent people like Bob, whose career defines them and is more important than anything else~there are many in every neighborhood...

It did not invent people like Sally, who go through life timid and half-asleep, only to discover their real personality and needs when placed in a challenging environment-they exist. They fall in love, they marry, they cheat sometimes, they divorce, they re-marry, and so on....that's life all around us.

It did not invent people like Luke, who are more manly because they can feel love and compassion than He-Man Bob, who was like a child playing cops and robbers, and was vain enough to "want to be a Hero". These people exist.

If one thinks that films should be used only to "champion" something and "preach something", maybe they would like life in more...controlled environments, because they have made plenty of films like that in the Soviet Union and China....

Amazing how controlling moralizing people can become, annoying everyone except those just like them....and in what danger free speech would be if they ever got a chance to mess with it....



reply

I didn't think that this movie glorified adultery. To me it showed two fragile people whose views on life changed because of the war. Luke was patriotic and welcomed going to war. When he became paralyzed it changed his view on his choices in life. Sally was on her own for the first time when her husband went to war. She realized that she wasn't as happy as she thought with her husband when she met Luke. It is a movie about people reevaluating their lives and sometimes making decisions that will hurt other people in the process.

reply

well said mate ! this is a exact reaction of thoughts and fillings came to my mind when I saw this movie.Things don't just happens.you make things happen.and to justify adultery in a wake of romanticism is very sick.they say she is transformed, but in real, she is taking disadvantage of her freedom by debauchery, spending his husband money on luxurious car, house at the beach instead of going to her mothers house for living.even she didn't earn any penny and thinks she is leaving on her own fornicating. it's evident that there is no apparent reason in her marriage to betray her husband like that, specially she knows he'll come home devastated by war. That is not love, just lust. how can you knowingly hurt someone you love unless you don't love him.so, she is slut and big liar.

reply

[deleted]