Am I the only one who liked this film?
This film ain't gonna win any Oscars anytime soon, but I thought it was a good B-movie.It is like a color version of one of those Roger Corman pictures, but better.
shareThis film ain't gonna win any Oscars anytime soon, but I thought it was a good B-movie.It is like a color version of one of those Roger Corman pictures, but better.
shareYeah i agree this is a good film. It's a squirm-inducing (no pun intended) horror, that's all it is. Some of the special effects are great still, i prefer these over CGI anyday. It's just good late night classic entertainment. I'd love to see a remake and i've written a sequel to the book myself (for my own private pleasure) All the characters (well the remaining three are in it and so are the worms.)
If they do, do a remake. Then they should start off with a better credits sequence that makes the audience very uneasy. By maybe focusing on a slimy horde of worms then have the words SQUIRM in a kind of skin crawling kind of way like it's acually moving like a worm.
SharkattackUK
I agree! Squirm is an excellent movie for what it is. The acting is... decent by most of the cast. I think because it's set in a small Southern U.S. town that the people are supposed to be folkish. I doubt the Mystery Science Theater 3000 people are from the South, so their jokes at the expense of this movie are more than a little distasteful. And the only scene in the movie that seems like it was made for that Mystery Science show is the "egg cream" thing in the diner. And yeah, the guy says "egg cream" way too much and it sounds stupid. But, at least the director isn't afraid to poke fun at "yankee" stereotypes.
There's a lot going on in this movie, and all of it heightens the atmosphere. The mother who is slowly going more and more out of her mind as the strange events keep unfolding, that amazing scene on the boat, the fact that Roger is a creepy guy who's a bit of a stalker but when the worms attack him, it's almost as though they give him a superpower.
Yeah the worms look fake in some scenes. And that's almost why it's sheer brilliance on the part of the director that Roger takes over as the film's main threat. And it's downright provocative and completely unpredictable that Roger seems to become a worm himself. As the director says, "Roger becomes one with the worms." Why? Who cares? It leads to so many great damn SHOCK moments toward the finale. Look at how incredibly creepy his eyes are in that ending. It's the stuff of pure nightmares. And the director deserves credit for all of that and the damn impressive way this movie was shot (very art-film inspired), over all the idiot people who take stupid potshots at this movie. You ever hear those losers? They honestly can't come up with 1 good argument against this movie.
This movie's rating on this site was absolutely the product of Mystery Science Theater 3000's show on the movie. So, ignore the rating because most of the people who gave it a negative rating just did so because of Mystery Science Theater 3000. Seriously- just look up all the other movies that that show put on their program. Most of them are incredibly obscure movies that no one's ever heard of before. But suddenly, all these votes just spring up overnight? I'm not buying it!!! And neither should anyone else.
"Carol, one word of advice: send Cindy to a special school"
I completely agree. This movie actually didn't get alot of publicity when it opened in 1976. I caught it a year later as a "second feature". It became one of my favorite movies then, and still is today.
Back in the 70's when I was a young teen, I liked most of the killer-insect-nature-strikes-back movies. Now, 30-some years later, most of them seem very silly (although I still enjoy them). "Squirm" was one of the few movies of that genre that held up well through the years. "Frogs" and "The Savage Bees" are others that have fared pretty well. These movies have atmosphere and character developement, even if some of the FX are out-dated.
Squirm is one of my favourite 70's horror films. I am actually creeped out by a couple of scenes in it - not so much because of the worms, even if the are gross, but because of Roger. On two occasions, his presence in the frame is so subtle you might not notice him. Just a glimpse of his disfigured face leering from the shadows. That works for me! There is also one quite fine jump scare near the end - that I'm pretty sure made me shriek the first time I saw it!
The leads are quite likable, and I'm really a fan of Liebermann's work - from this one to Blue Sunshine and Just Before Dawn.
Nah man... I loved it when I saw it back when I was about ten... Haven't seen it since... Still a fan of the clips on youtube it's stll as cool as I remember. THe guy with the wormface and all... Great stuff!
share[deleted]
I saw this as a young girl in the 80's and it creeped me out, somewhat. I wasn't scared but the thought of worms attacking was a scary thought. This movie has a 'The Birds' feel to it, maybe a small homage to Hitchcock??? I still like this movie. I thought I was the only one. Glad to not be all alone.
shareNo way! You are not the only one! I think this film is a grossly undrated one. I saw it as a kid during the 70's and bought it a couple of years ago on DVD. I see it now and then and never lose interest. Something about it (the wooded location) that works for me as a 'monster' flick! I saw 'Slithers' and still love 'Squirms' better! I would love to see photos of the filming locations as they look today. Does anybody live near Port Wentworth, Georgia to take pictres and post them on the internet?
We should start a 'Squirm' fan club...you 'basket cas' should lead on!
One of those silly 'horror' films that attract teens with too much time on their hands.
share