MovieChat Forums > I, Claudius (1977) Discussion > HBO + BBC2 Teaming to Re-make I, Claudiu...

HBO + BBC2 Teaming to Re-make I, Claudius.


I don't know if this has already been brought up inside another thread, but I didn't see a new one about this yet.

http://www.deadline.com/2011/06/hbo-bbc2-new-make-deal-to-turn-robert-graves-novel-i-claudius-into-epic-miniseries/

EXCLUSIVE: HBO has teamed with BBC2 to acquire the rights to turn the Robert Graves historical novel I, Claudius into a miniseries. The mini will be exec produced by BBC Worldwide Productions' Jane Tranter and Anne Thomopoulos, who were executives producers of HBO's Rome. The deal ends a long series of twists and turns for the rights to a book that was previously turned into an Emmy-winning 13-part miniseries in 1976 by BBC. In that mini, Derek Jacobi turned in the role of a career as Claudius. The book and mini gave a glimpse into the power, madness, murder, backstabbing and debauchery that was part and parcel of ruling-class Rome. It is seen through the eyes of Claudius, who was content to be the butt of jokes and hide his brilliance behind a stutter and a limp. Because he was never perceived as a threat, Claudius was never poisoned as many others in his circle were. Claudius outlasted them all, and became emperor in 41 A.D.

The feature rights were long controlled by In The Name of the Father helmer Jim Sheridan, but suddenly those rights were shopped in 2007. It looked like producer Scott Rudin beat out a competitive field of suitors to pay $2 million for the rights. He had Oscar-nominated The Departed scribe William Monahan ready to write it and Leonardo DiCaprio ready to attach himself to star. But the deal collapsed when Sheridan successfully challenged the claim in Ireland. By the time Sheridan finally bowed out, Rudin was no longer interested because he had moved on to another Roman Era epic, the movie adaptation of Stacy Schiff's book Cleopatra: A Life, which has Angelina Jolie ready to play the Egyptian queen and David Fincher keen to direct her. Others flirted with the property, but the story is so big that it became clear that a miniseries was a way to get everything in. That opened the door for Tranter, who pursued the property for a decade. HBO has feasted on episodic period dramas, from Rome to its current run of Game of Thrones.

While BBC controls the original miniseries, the HBO/BBC2 production will primarily be based on the two books Graves wrote on the subject and not that earlier mini. There is I, Claudius: From the Autobiography of Tiberius Claudius Born 10 B.C. Murdered And Deified A.D. 54, and Claudius The God: And His Wife Messalina. No elements have yet been attached, but given the caliber of talent that pursued the property, I bet it will be formidable. The rights deal was brokered by AP Watt in London and Liza Wachter at the RWSG Literary Agency.

reply

This is good news. People are much too pessimistic about this. HBO's Rome is one of the finest shows and the crew proved it. I think if anyone can redo I, Claudius, it's them.

reply

Are 'two executive producers of ROME' and 'The Creators of ROME' the same thing?

reply

Did I ever say the creators of Rome?

reply

You didn't, but I get the idea that others do.

reply

[deleted]

I would like to see a remake as the original series, while magnificent, suffers from being too stagey with the actors loudly speaking their lines in the Royal Shakespeare Company style. Although I am British, I found the stiff 'upperclass' pronunciation, such as yers for years, rather irritating. The actors in the orignial were mostly stage actors and it showed. The new version should be in the style of 'Rome' with lots of outdoor scenes, and the English softened to a conversational style with lower class and regional accents. With modern sound, they no longer need to shout their lines.

reply

I have no problem with any of the actors' delivery of their lines.

They should really not remake the series. It's perfection.

reply

That would be great.

I liked Rome, but it was a different era, but it was done well.

I wish that movie studios would try to do things like that and make them historically accurate so people would actually learn something ... truth is stranger and more interesting than fiction any day!

reply

You say its going to be based on the books not the mini series but it was very accurate to the books

reply

What an exciting prospect! I hope it comes off. It is very brave, having a hard act to follow but, I would be interested to see what it would look like with a bigger budget.
If it's terrible, it will not detract from the original and if it's good, I will be there to lap it up.

reply

I'd like to - and ask myself to - have an open mind such as you do. I really, really do.

Yet I remain sceptic about the outcome.

What is it that we loved so much about the 1976 series? Was it Robert Graves' book? No. Was it the general idea; a film about Roman emperors and their families? No. Was it the involvement of the BBC? No.

Yet that is exactly what will transfer from the old to the new. The book, the idea, the BBC.

What we loved so much were the actors. It was the dialogue, the script. It was the total focus on the acting, not on any brouhaha visuals. It was the voices of these actors, their mannerisms, their faces. How could any other actor topple Livia? How could any other actor make us forget August, or Caligula? How could any other actor *ever* match the Claudius that is etched in our hearts & minds forever?

O.K., this is not fair. The new series will not be made for us, die-hard fans of the older series. The younger generation 'deserves' its own series. But how to win their hearts & minds? If the youngsters deserve a similar experience that we had, the producers had better focus on the actors too, their interplay, the dialogue. NOT the visuals.

Then again, how would that fare with the younger generation? Aren't they spoiled with X-Men and Taxi's and Avengers to the extent that they will never enjoy a dramatic TV experience such as we had in the 1970's?

Just asking.

reply