MovieChat Forums > Picnic at Hanging Rock (1979) Discussion > Director's cut, or original version -- y...

Director's cut, or original version -- your recommendations?


I'd like to buy the movie on Blu-ray -- but I see that the Blu-ray version Amazon are selling is the "Director's Cut" that loses seven minutes and some scenes and dialogue.

There is a DVD that has the original version.

Does anyone have any strong feelings for or against the missing material? What exactly has been cut? Can you describe the missing scenes?

I can't decide what to buy, so any input or differing opinions will be valuable to hear; advance thanks to any responders.



Just for the record, I'm female...

reply

/\ This /\

**Wait***
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073540/alternateversions

"Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion"

reply

Go with the original version.

The "directors' cut" was done 23 years later and cutting those seven minutes is a mistake.

--
LBJ's mistress tells all:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPdviZbk-XI&;


reply

I agree with PrometheusTree -- the original is the one you want. If only because it contains some of the most atmospheric scenery in an already gorgeous film. It also touches a bit more on Irma's story.

reply

I've only seen the Director's cut. Wish I could find the original, it's not available on Region 1.

From what I've read, the OC ending sounds absolutely chilling; however, the DC ending with the freeze-frame of Mrs. Appleyard and narration is pretty perfect as is. Something about the detached narration reporting these sinister events works very well. And the final, hallucinatory slow-motion flashback of the girls at the Rock is gorgeously done.

reply

I watched the original version today, and all that you describe is in the original version as well. I watched also the "Scenes deleted from the director's cut" on the extra's and I have to say, I think I might actually prefer the Director's Cut. Most of the cut bits I really wouldn't mind missing. I'll have to watch the DC soon. I don't think I ever saw it that way. And the quality of the Original version lacked enough for me to want to watch a proper blu-ray version the next time. Which leaves only the Director's Cut to be watched.

reply

I saw this in the theater when it first came out and I swear there was a scene that showed the visitation of Sara in Albert's bedroom after she died. She appeared at the foot of his bed and said to him that she had come a long way to see him and would have to leave him now. This was the scene of the movie that I remembered the most and have always been disappointed that it was cut. (And I'm quite certain that this isn't a false memory.)

reply

The original version is by far the best.

The directors cut removes a lot of small stuff that added to the haunting effect of original.

Obviously time has changed Peter Weir's perspective so he felt driven to make changes.

But he pretty much has final cut in 1976. In such cases I don't think directors should be allowed mess with the original.

Some directors cuts really improve on a film (Aliens, Blade Runner, The Wild Bunch) but some add absolutely nothing new or detract from the original (Alien, ET, Apocalypse Now)



"I only work in black, and sometimes very very dark grey"

reply

The uncut version is now available on Pirate Bay for those without region free players. I will probably buy the 3 DVD set and the Criterion BR at some point because they both contain different bonus features. The BR transfer is suppose to be top notch though so if you love the film it's probably worth owning both. The only problem is finding a decent [in price and quality] region free BR player.

reply

Well damn, I didn't even realized there were two versions and I was watching the directors cut. Judging by the comments I wonder if I missed the more atmospheric bits and now should see it again.

reply

The scenes aren't very important. They're also from a rough source and not remastered...or if they are the source is really rough.

reply