MovieChat Forums > Picnic at Hanging Rock (1979) Discussion > How do some consider this a horror movie...

How do some consider this a horror movie???


I don't really understand how many consider Picnic At Hanging Rock a horror movie. I mean it's very atmospheric and haunting but it doesn't seem right to call it a horror movie. I've only seen the director's cut which cuts about 7 minutes from the original, are there any horror elements that make it so? If not, then why call it a horror film? I was just wondering because to me there is nothing in the director's cut that can call it a horror movie.

reply

It's not a horror movie in the classic mold but it certainly creeped me - and, evidently, many others - out to the point where I'd definitely regard it as such. The exact reasons as to why... for me, in a general way, it's just a sense of eerie, not-quite-right uncanniness that permeates beneath the surface of the film. Things feel off by a few inches and, particularly when watching it alone late at night, this sensation builds and builds and builds.

I don't think it's entirely in the eye of us beholders, either. Aside from the overall premise (which I find to be incredibly creepy unto itself), there are moments that, to me, feel very much tweaked to scare the audience. The girls wandering around hanging rock, for example, the intense rumble of the soundtrack, the cavernous passages, not to mention the 'faces' in the rock itself - creepy. Edith's big scream, hell, even that moment towards the end where it's just a series of still frames flitting between various ornaments in Appleyard's office accompanied by that darn rumbling soundtrack again - these, to me, are 'scares' in sufficient quantity to warrant calling the film horror, amongst many other things.

reply

I agree, have also seen only the Director's Cut, Its NOT a horror film in any way IMO.

" Look, there's two women fuc*ing a polar bear!" - Fear And Loathing in Las Vegas 1998

reply

It's horror in the purest sense.

---
It's not "sci-fi", it's SF!

reply

Horror is notoriously hard to define. But I'd say PAHR is indeed horror because it has to do with the unexplained and (possibly) the paranormal. Also, it's frightening. At least to some. Not in the way [REC] is frightening, certainly, but frightening in its own delicately spooky way.


________________________________________

I don't come from hell. I came from the forest.

reply

I just watched this for the first time and I'd say classifying it as "horror" is acceptable. The beauty of this film for me is that the elements of "horror" or the supernatural are so vague in that it's entirely up to the viewers perception of the events to give it the weight of horror. Seeing the 3 girls take off their leggings & shoes and walk SLOWLY in a trance-like state up the rock CREEPED ME OUT! That to me was pure HORROR. It's a shame that horror went from "horrifying" to "SHOCK" somewhere along the road (slasher films perhapse?).

Anywho, this is a film that trancends genre classification but I do think it is safe to say it has "horrifying" elements.

reply

For me, it doesn't have to be a direct horror (blood, on-screen murder). I consider the tone of the film to be horror and this definitely doesn't have that tone.

reply

Well I'd say in return, how is it not considered horror?

I think many people have trouble disassociating horror from Friday The 13TH and the like. Horror is much more varied than that, perhaps the genre with the most subgenres.

reply

PAHR focuses on our primeval fear of not knowing which can indeed be terrifying.



reply

Think "Twilight Zone". That's what "Picnic at Hanging Rock" is like to me.

Horror might be a bit of a stretch but I can certainly understand why someone would apply it to "Picnic at Hanging Rock". That's what makes it so good: you think you're going to watch a stuffy period piece (the costumes! the set design! the low keyed emotions!) and then you get to the end of the movie and provided you've watched the film under the right circumstances (as someone else suggested late at night is best) you'll be creeped out. It's a movie that sticks in your craw.

Years ago my brother and I would watch "Twilight Zone" episodes on a small black and white TV we shared in our room late at night (they played in the NY area at 1:00 AM back in the late 70s). The lateness of night, the darkness made even the most mundane episodes feel creepy. I suggest anyone interested in seeing "Picnic at Hanging Rock" to watch it at night with no lights on.

reply

[deleted]

I saw this film as a 6 year old, at an open-air, moonlight screening at Hanging Rock, *beep* terrifying! Haven't been able to rewatch it for fear of disappointment.

reply

[deleted]

I saw this film for a 3rd time last night, and I was rather unsettled. The first time I watched it over this past summer, I was unsure of what I thought of it, apart from the darkness of the last several minutes.

The second time I watched it, back in January, I found the suspense and anticipation of watching the events unfold to be nearly unbearable.

Last night when I watched it with my partner I enjoyed it once again. We discussed the film for a bit after but then went on to other things. However, I went to bed earlier and was in our upstairs on my own. for some reason i had a tremendous sense of unease. I felt less than secure. And as I continued to doze in and out, I kept seeing the film in some way or another; each time making it more difficult to fall back to sleep.

I think this film could be considered horror. Perhaps not for what takes place on screen but the feelings it leaves us with. To me, good horror stays with you long after a film ends, and for me, that is really where the horror of PAHR begins. It is truly haunting ans unshakably mysterious. A film that makes me jump is not one that I find scary because those films are very often over as the credits begin to roll. A film like this follows you around and creeps back into your mind from time to time reminding you that it is still there. While it may not posses the elements of terror as a slasher film might, this, to me, is horror.

reply

The pervasive and lingering unease you describe is how I felt after watching Lake Mungo (2008), another slow-paced and eerie Australian film. You might enjoy it.


I don't come from hell. I came from the forest.

reply