The movie was great but what's with the casting?.............. =____=
They could have chosen a ***way*** more beautiful actress instead of this dumb brunette with no breast... I know it's an old 70's movie, but I wish a more gorgeous and sexy girl was in the lead role, it would have been a lot better!
(after all, this movie is about showing a girl nude, so the more beautiful the better!! ^____^)
Corinne Clery is great, just watch Hitch Hike. Its too bad this movie was terrible, one of the worst I've seen.
share[deleted]
Corinne Clery was perfect the only problem with casting was sir stephan he looked like an old, wimpy, grey haired pee wee hermon.
shareIncognitoFemme ,corine clery is just "average man's beauty".. there are better ones for thinking men.... btw. about baywatch, do you think alessandra paul could be right for the role as "O"?
sharewhen I see the name pamela andersen , I stop the reading.
well, the OP is an innocent guy, he has no faults, just bad! bad! bad! taste..
usually i would suggest to seal the playboy magazines,start to improve the taste. but even Playboy is better (95% times)
[deleted]
In the classic French novel which this is based on, the character O wasn't supposed to be this stunningly sexy woman, with large breasts on blonde hair. Clery is the perfect choice, i think; she's beautiful in a classy way, as is the entire production. Maybe some people think O should look like Jaqueline, but that is not the way the author intended.
Fabio Testi is GOD
Well, they wanted Carol Burnett but she was occupiedo...
Fabio Testi is GOD
Dude u have a poor taste...
shareIsabelle Adjani would have been better. Coincidentally, 1975 was when cinema-going audiences saw her in François Truffaut's The Story of Adele H.
share