The 2nd season both he and Helena lighten up considerably.
And that was the reason I couldn't stand season 2. It was unrealistic considering Alpha's circumstances. I particularly despised what they did to Helena.
"Sometimes my ruminations are too confusing for someone not inside my head." -Anon reply share
Hey, I watched Black Sun yesterday evening and I saw Koenig smile from ear to ear after they came through and when the Eagle and its crew miraculously returned due to Divine intervention. Give him a break, everyone.
He smiled when he had something to smile about but he wasn't the type to just laugh at anything at any time. What was going on was serious, especially in season one.
But I do agree with the person who said he lightened up in season 2. A lot of that having to do with his relationship with Helena. It's obvious the two are lovers by then where-as in the first season we weren't altogether sure what they were.
And Martin Landau has a great smile so it's always nice to see.
All your reasoning for hating Koenig were all the reasons I loved him. At least he wasn't Capt Kirk who got down every young yomen's skirts.
Landau played Koenig with a ton of professionalism and stoicism that made me love Koenig far and above anything William Shatner created with Kirk. Considering the plight Alpha found itself in, moreso season one, it was appropriate for Koenig to be so business-like. Landau embued Koenig with a humility and humanity that was sadly lacking in anything Shatner played. It took me a long time to find anyone close to Koenig in terms of a solid leader of a show. That finally came with "Deep Space Nine" and Avery Brooks as Capt. Sisko. I began watching 1999 when I was twelve and because of how Landau played Koenig, I took to wanting quality television with a solid lead such as Landau.
"Sometimes my ruminations are too confusing for someone not inside my head." -Anon
I thought year 1 Koenig was totally appropriate. It was year 2 that went off the deep end. I agree with the other poster about Helena. I loved the tense feel of the first season. It was perfect for the situation they were in. Season 2 seemed like the runaway moon was an amusement ride the way they acted. Totally inappropriate.
And let's not forget, if he hadn't been so dour and serious all the time the whole of Alpha would be stuck on that planet looking as high as kites and being manipulated by Maya in a white one piece bathing suit.
I'd like to think by season two they were more comfortable in their environment, despite the danger, and allowed themselves the luxury of love and moments of lightness. I didn't think it was a bad thing and enjoyed Commander Koenig and Dr. Russell in season two. However, I do understand why he and she were so tense in season one.
I think anyone would've been tense lost in deep space with very little control of their surroundings, with limited resources. It was season two's loose attitudes that seemed out of place to me. Vast sections of the base had been moved underground and they now had laser batteries set up on the lunar surface for defense, but their basic situation hadn't changed any.
I'd like to think by season two they were more comfortable in their environment, despite the danger, and allowed themselves the luxury of love and moments of lightness. I didn't think it was a bad thing and enjoyed Commander Koenig and Dr. Russell in season two. However, I do understand why he and she were so tense in season one.
Season two was a joke and a travesty and for me, does not exist. I watch the episodes from that season, but shake my head whenever I see the evening dresses, the bathing suits and fancy hairdos that weren't part of season one. It boggles my mind with Freddie Friedberger's reasoning for the sudden fancy clothes, "Season two finds them far more able to enjoy their private time. The clothes were put away when the moon broke out and forgotten about in the drive to survive. Now with them more comfortable with themselves and their plight, they can now enjoy themselves more and enjoy their relationships." That is just so stupid. The skirts, go go boots, evening dresses...where did they put those away to, exactly? It's like the whole idea of Maya. While I adore Catherine Schell, I do not feel she was right for season two. I found too Tony Verdeschi to be totally out of place considering the arrow Paul Morrow was. Tony was too cartoonish for my liking. What I loved about Morrow, Tanya, David Kano and the other Alphans who worked in Main Mission was their professionalism and how they were dedicated to their jobs. I was not willing to lose Bergman, Morrow, Tanya or Kano for the crap Friedberger fed us in season two. And please, what was Yasko? She was like watching dry ice melt. While I didn't mind Alibe, the whole addition of Annette Fraser and Yasko turned the seriousness of Sandra, Tanya, and the other women of season one back a hundred years. Lip gloss? Fancy hair styles? Please!
And do not mention the total idiocy of Helena Russell from season two to me. Friedberger filled Bain's head with as much drivel as he could to make her think she was an actress. Season one Helena was under the direction of Sylvia Anderson and with the divorce from Gerry for season two, Helena was off the rails as were any of the other female characters. Changing the dynamic between John and Helena to this put on love or admiration plus the addition of Koenig's wife in "Rules of Luton" just about made me quit watching. What I loved about season one was the "2001: A Space Odyssey" homage it had. There was no need to change that feeling. But they did and when they did, a lot of what made me watch the show was gone. I watched to the end solely for Martin, Nick, Zienia, Catherine and for the memory of what was season one. But seriously, can you look at those monsters Maya turned into and the ones in "The Bringers of Wonder" as anything remotely sci-fi-ish? I can't. The philisophical questions asked in season one like "The Black Sun," "The Full Circle," "The Testament of Arkadia" and others were the reasons I adore and love season one.
I'm sorry to be such a downer on season two, but it was ridiculous and contrived compared to season one.
Sometimes my ruminations are too confusing for someone not inside my head. -Anon reply share
And do not mention the total idiocy of Helena Russell from season two to me. Friedberger filled Bain's head with as much drivel as he could to make her think she was an actress.
She is an actress. A three time Emmy award winning actress at the time. She was and still is a beautiful, competent actress who went on to win awards for her many stage appearances even after she semi-retired from acting. I don't think Fred Frieberger or Gerry/Sylvia Anderson was needed to tell her she was an actress. She knew it ... and still does. And so do her fans.
Season one Helena was under the direction of Sylvia Anderson and with the divorce from Gerry for season two, Helena was off the rails as were any of the other female characters. Changing the dynamic between John and Helena to this put on love or admiration plus the addition of Koenig's wife in "Rules of Luton" just about made me quit watching.
Not me. I am a fan of Season One but there were some touches in Season Two I liked although, over all, I am not a season two fan. However, the romance between the Commander and Dr. Russell was not, in my opinion, a bad thing. I enjoyed watching the evolution of their relationship.
What I loved about season one was the "2001: A Space Odyssey" homage it had. There was no need to change that feeling.
That I agree with.
But seriously, can you look at those monsters Maya turned into and the ones in "The Bringers of Wonder" as anything remotely sci-fi-ish? I can't. The philisophical questions asked in season one like "The Black Sun," "The Full Circle," "The Testament of Arkadia" and others were the reasons I adore and love season one.
I agree with this too. I hated the monsters in Season Two. And I loved the philosophy is Season One. reply share
It's sad how often people will make the wrong choice even when it's right in front of their stupid faces.
Such as Barack Obama saying he wanted to "fundamentally transform" America should have meant NOBODY voted for him. Along with "energy prices will necessarily skyrocket under my policies," etc.
I really didn't like either Landau's or Bain's acting in this show. They were a little bit better in Mission: Impossible, but they used the same techniques they learned in acting classes. I've tried to imagine Ed Bishop from UFO as Koenig instead and I think he would have done a great job. Wanda Ventham would have been much stronger and more attractive as Helena, with fewer weepy, breathy pronouncements.
I thought Landau did a great job portraying the gravity of the situation he was in. There were times he was able to relax or share a friendly moment with Victor or Helena, but most of the time he was dealing with the fact that he was responsible for the lives of people who were living subject to a largely uncontrollable situation.
Nope. He was awful. I never got the impression that he felt all that responsible. Any of the Star Trek captains (with the possible exception of the equally awful Scott Bakula) felt like they cared more about their crew, including Janeway in the similarly lost Voyager.
In Season 1 both John Koenig and Helena Russell are so cold and self absorbed it's very hard to care about them.
Thankfully Ferd Freiburger fixed that in Season 2 both act like John Koenig and Helena Russell *real* human beings and their loving relationship reflects that.
I never thought they were cold - they were trying to be professional (when Koenig wasn't losing his temper, anyway - lol). On season two they went too far in the other direction, often acting as though they were at a party and not on a vulnerable rock plunging through space. Martin Landau did acknowledge that Frieberger helped the characters to an extent, but had them act out of character too often. Frieberger tried to ignore the first season whenever possible, trying to turn the show into something else. That's why season two failed (in most people's eyes). But there are viewers who thought season two was an improvement over season one. I'm not one of those people, but I do find that interesting.
In Season 1 both John Koenig and Helena Russell are so cold and self absorbed it's very hard to care about them.
No, season two had them totally vacuous to their plight. Koenig and Russell in season one had them facing odds that were at best, tenuous. No self absorption, more stoic and feeling the burden that was placed on them as being the leaders of this stranded crew. The enormity of their journey ahead uppermost in their minds.
Thankfully Ferd Freiburger fixed that in Season 2 both act like John Koenig and Helena Russell *real* human beings and their loving relationship reflects that.
Freddie Friedberger didn't fix anything. He mucked everything up. John and Helena were real in season one. Season two Koenig and Russell were a fraction of themselves from season one. The interactions between them were laughable. In season one's "Dragon's Domain" where they were talking about the mythology of Tony Cellini and the monster in terms of calling it "George and the Dragon" was so spot on with the challenges they faced in their journey. Nothing about season two was as good or as cerebral as season one. The things they faced in season one were far more human-based than in season two. Season one came at it that we were all alike. Everything in their travels was universal, which is what "The Testament of Arkadia" was all about. Connecting us on Earth to what was out there in terms of the humanness of what the Alphans encountered. Ergo, the Darians, "The Last Enemy" people, "Death's Other Dominion...." etc. Season one was as close as one could get in continuing what Kubrick began with "2001: A Space Odyssey" and Koenig reminded me a lot of what Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood brought to the table with their portrayals of Dave Bowman and Frank Poole. David Kano was the culmination of what HAL-9000 began in terms of what would happen if that brain were made human. What exactly was "Brian the Brain?" I loved "Death's Other Dominion" in what it said about the ways in which we seek immortality. Cabot Rowland found it, but exploited it for his own means. The same with The Darians. Using human bodies to keep a gene bank from depleting a la the whole dynamic of Eugenics was progressive. There isn't one season two episode that could touch any of those episodes. Same with episodes like "The Black Sun" that posited was God a woman? The aspect of a mindless Utopia in "Guardian of Piri" where the Alphans were rendered mindless in the whole aspect of having freewill removed from them. There were no themes to season two, only a bunch of sad episodes where characters I loved from season one, were reduced to playing caricatures of their season one personas.
In summing up season one, it was pure science fiction. Season two was like watching reruns of "Sigmund and the Sea Monsters."
Sometimes my ruminations are too confusing for someone not inside my head. -Anon reply share
I was totally appalled to discover that they'd dropped the Bergman character from the show, after naively being under the impression that the commercials featuring Maya were simply advertising the first episode of the new season. But I was such a diehard fan that the fact that there was a whole new season ahead that I adjusted. It started out well. The Metamorph was good, the Exiles was mildly good, Journey To Where was good (the first three episodes shown in the Boston area), but the majority of the first half of the season weren't very impressive (eleven episodes were shown, then the first four were repeated - making me think it was a short season until a new group of episodes beginning with Space Warp appeared). I thought the next group was a general improvement. Don't even get me started with Brian the Brain - the premise was absurd - a "star mission" launched in 1996? On Voyager's Return we were told that the Queller Drive made star travel possible, but was too dangerous for a manned crew. Halfway through the season it was announced that there was to be no season three, which was disappointing, but after season two we were treated to the rerunning of the superior season one.
I don't know about him being the saddest human being ever, but he was certainly the angriest man in space. Man, could that man ever shout......
Yeah, then he wondered why nobody liked him. John Koenig is *much* better in second season where he is actually a sympathetic character who actually reasons his way to everyone rather than shouting half the time.
reply share
He shouted because he was under stress, as anyone would've been in his situation. Season Two had the characters unrealistically content to be stranded on a runaway moon.
Stress was a his part of his job. He made the choice to put himself and everyone else under additional stress. Season Two had the character being content with the situation they themselves chose to accept.
Which was unrealistic. The feel of season one was perfect - everyone on edge. Season two had the characters joking around as though they were on vacation.
Hardly. Koenig made that decision for everyone, and that was never challenged until the Seance Spectre from the second season by Greg Sanderson who was psychotic. So they were on a vacation, one that they chose to take.
Oh, sorry. You're right about that. I always thought the first episode should've been a TV movie so they could get into details like that - it would've been interesting to see crowds of personnel rushing for the launch pads as soon as they realized what had happened. Mutineers would've shown themselves as Koenig attempted to restore order. But within the confines of a single episode, the story had to be more succinct.
Sure, I agree that Breakaway should have been 2 hours but sadly it's not. Would have made that decision? Gerry Anderson and Lord Lew Grade. In every version I have seen or read Koenig makes that decision and no one even thinks of challenging that at all. Therefore, all the Alphans have resigned themselves to a ongoing vacation that they make the best of. Party time!
Look at this another way, you are dealing with the same people everyday all the time. You really don't have much choice but to sit back and enjoy the ride.
In reality, they would've had overworked base counselors. People committing suicide, drinking and drugging themselves to death. The saner ones would be concentrating on keeping the base operational, not standing around making jokes.
In reality, they would've had overworked base counselors. People committing suicide, drinking and drugging themselves to death. The saner ones would be concentrating on keeping the base operational, not standing around making jokes.
Sure but only if you don't really want to be there. In reality, they would have tried to leave the moon to go back to earth, no matter how bad the chances were. No one tried. John made his call and it's accepted by everybody. Given that no one tried to leave, making jokes while you do you do your best to enjoy yourself is exactly what would have happened.
reply share
Maybe I'm a pessimist, but I picture a lot of despair among the crew of Alpha. There should've been a stronger reason for not attempting an exodus to Earth. Residual magnetic radiation from the explosions would've been plausible, wreaking havoc with the Eagles guidance systems - the only flaw with that is that Alan Carter made it safely back to the base.
Right there was why the show wasn't received as well as it should've been when it originally aired. Too many sci-fi fans had it embedded in their minds that Star Trek was the only way to do TV Sci-Fi.