@foxfirebrand
I read somewhere that the film only played a week before before it was pulled from the screen---even back then, the average film played at least one or two months to make back its budget at the box office. So it seems strange that the film was pulled before it could even start to make any money. That's not even what a studio normally does with a movie,anyway. Also, it was an indie film with no big stars, but that never stopped any studio form pushing a film, even back then,particularly if they thought it would make some money. I do find it interesting that a film made by black people that encouraged black folks to think and be activists, to some extent, was so hard to find for years. My guess it that the studio just dumped it into theatres thinking it was just another low-budget blaxploitation flick, and when they found out what it was really about, it probably freaked them the hell out, and that's why they pulled it off the screens. Given the time it came out in, I wouldn't be surprised if it had been covertly banned in some way.
People were fat and complacent and clueless back then, much as they are now-
Excuse me? The Occupied Movement, however brief its moment in the sun was, showed that people aren't as fat,complacent and clueless as you claim they are. Maybe that's the kind of people YOU knew, but it certainly doesn't mean everybody else was.
Saw this film at a college screening recently, of all places, for the 3rd time and still enjoyed it. I also saw the documentary about the film called INFILTRATING HOLLYWOOD, which details how difficult it was to get the film made---after seeing that, it seems like a miracle the film even got made in the first place. Saw it at a college screening with my activist friend and both of us got to talk to the director about it---that was really fun. I hope that's available on DVD.
reply
share