I grew up in an atheist household. My parents wanted me to make my own decisions about religion, and they sent me to Sunday school for a balanced view. None of the lessons seemed like anything but mythology to me. So, when I was still a child and JC Superstar came to TV, I avoided it as "more Bible stories." In fact, I even made fun of it. My parents, however, loved it and tried to get me interested. "It's not what you think!" they would say.
In high school, a classmate (and Jewish atheist), whose taste in music and movies I admired, told me that he was a fan of the film. So, finally, I gave it a try. I loved it immediately, and bought the soundtrack album that week. I wore out the record playing it repeatedly, learning every word of the libretto. Since then, I have also owned two DVDs that I have seen numerous times. I have seen the play live three times, once with Ted Neeley and Carl Anderson.
The story is so special because it focuses on the humanity of the Gospels characters, rather than the shallow Christian message reported from the pulpit.
Jesus has conflicts with his needs and pains as a man. He perseveres with his message in the face of adversity, but after 3 years of struggle, begins to feel tired and disheartened. He can't understand the violent reactions of the people around him. He is perhaps most tortured by the decay of his friendship with Judas.
Judas is his closest friend, who sees Jesus' role more pragmatically, and warns Jesus not to take the God association too seriously. He is not a villain (in the Gospels, he is a servant of God's will and not a villain either). He truly loves Jesus to the end and regrets the betrayal.
Although Biblical scholars had already disproved the idea that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute by the time Tim Rice wrote the libretto, I love the way his version of Mary finds a new way to love a man, a way she had never felt before. She, alone (and maybe Judas), understands him as a man.
Pilate is a complex role. As others have pointed out here, he has no desire to see Jesus die. He has his own inner conflicts. At the same time, he is an arrogant Roman official, who views the Jews as inferior and ridiculous. I think that he sees something special in Jesus that touches him.
Additionally, I like the way the opera handles the priests. They see Jesus as a challenge to their authority that must be removed. And while they might be seen as the only true villains in the opera, Caiaphas at one point says, almost to himself, "One thing I'll say for him, Jesus is cool." He later shows remorse during the flogging.
Lastly, I must mention the portrayal Jesus' followers. While there is always the danger that the Jewish people will be seen as "Christ killers," I think an important aspect of the story is how the people who followed Jesus (even the apostles) really didn't understand him. They saw him only as an agent to get what they wanted, whether is was an easy ticket to heaven or a rebellion against Rome. The followers became disillusioned when Jesus didn't do what they expected and, in the end, many rejected him. Maybe it was not necessary to portray them as actually screaming for his death, but they may have gone to the point of not preventing the priests from turning Jesus over to the Romans.
Through Jesus Christ Superstar, I found a whole new way to understand the Gospels and I gained a whole new respect for the potential depth of the story of Jesus. I am still an atheist, but I have read the Gospels a few times, more than most Christians I have met.
reply
share