The Jackals mistakes


One of my favorite thrillers, but the Jackal makes some terrible mistakes:
1. Why drive like a banshee after you've painted your car and have new license plates?
2. Why use the name Duggan in registering for a room? Pay cash and use a phony name, any name.
3. Why tell the Paris cop the street address of where you are going to (as the one-legged veteran)?
4. Why tell the man in the bathhouse, the name Per Lundquist, when you don't have to?
Nonetheless, one excellent film.

reply

1. Maybe he just got a thrill out of driving fast. Not everything he does is germaine to the mission.
2. It is a false name
3. I don't know if he did name his specific destination. He may have told the Gendarme a false address and he and Lebel saw the open window and realized what was happening. I'd have to watch it again to be sure.
4. Why does it matter?

"It's a joke. We'll laugh about it in the car."

reply

[deleted]

What makes you think he gave the real address to the gendarme? I seem to remember he just said "I live here" (or "there", not sure which) and pointed, but we don't know if he identified the actual building.

As Hancock says, it doesn't really matter because Lebel and the gendarme found him because they saw the open window.

I thought he made a mistake by setting himself up in the room and then leaving the window open. Surely he could have kept the window shut until he needed to shoot. True that he wouldn't have known what time to shoot unless he knew exactly what time De Gaulle was going to be in ceremony. Then again, he fired the shot (that missed) as Lebel was charging up the stairs. So maybe he didn't make a mistake there after all. But what he really needed was a window he could see through without having to open it. He could have opened it at the last mment as he needed to. I seem to remember the windows in the apartment were boarded up.

When I said I wanted to be a comedian, they all laughed at me. Well, they're not laughing now!

reply

[deleted]

"He could have opened (the window) at the last moment as he needed to"

Well with the rooftops crawling with marksmen looking for anything suspicious, the last thing he’d want to do is draw attention by opening a window. He’d be relying on giving no sign of where the shot came from to make his getaway.
(I don't think the windows were boarded up, but he arranged the curtains so no-one could look in)

And he gave the address, AFAIR. But anyway it was on the papers he'd had made; it wasn't a mistake, the CRS would never have let him through otherwise.

It was only Lebel putting two and two together (someone going through he barrier, an open window in the house) that made him check.

And they were checking everything; remember the guy who reached in his pocket for cigarettes and got jumped by a whole load of police?

reply

to the original poster: foreigners are required to register with a passport, possibly in Europe, certainly in France. (Compare the procedures at registration desks in the modern 'Bourne' films). Lacking computers (in that day), additional copies of guest registrations were prepared -- that was how the French police forces tracked the movement of people around the country. trying to pay cash, and not using a credit card, would offer no advantage.

in modern times, with networks and databases, the poor Jackal would have been nailed as soon as he showed up in a hotel with his phony passport. in that era, he had the lag time -- the time that lapsed between when the guest registry cards were picked up by a gendarme, and delivered by courier to a central pooling area for examination. and he a tipster on the inside.

I read once that a 'professional' assassination requires 3 things: 1> clear path to the target 2> deadly aim 3> means of escape (yes, the pros want to spend their fee - no one wants to take one for the team)..

I thought the Forsythe story and this screenplay covered this well...

:-) canuckteach (--:

reply

He told the gendarme he lived at #154 and it was on his papers.

reply

2. During my travels in europe in the 70's, a passport was required when checking into a hotel. therefore he would give the false "Duggan" passport. The passport is then retruned on checkout.

reply

his mistakes:

spending his earnings on scarves/kerchiefs
not spending his earnigs on some better dentistry

reply

Haha.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Exactly correct as I lived in Europe (Mostly France) in the early 1960's and you had to surrender your passport when checking into a hotel and it was returned to you upon checking out.

reply

1. The car colour had changed but he couldn't know for sure (given the nature of how they got _any_ info about the investigation, through pillow talk, it'd be sketchy details most of the time) just how much they knew, and they might still track him down, so (as far as I can tell) the idea was to get to somewhere, quickly, where he might be able to hide out or switch cars, and change his appearance to that of the Danish schoolteacher. He would have tried to get there as fast as possible, and presumably at that point in time there wasn't massive police patrols, speed cameras etc, so as long as he slowed down going through any towns, he'd be unlikely to ever see a police car.

He _did_ switch to a train to get into Paris itself, so it would seem, within the reality of the film as presented, that he was somewhat aware of where he could get away with a car with dodgy plates or driving fast etc.

2. Everyone else covered it.

3. If he didn't nominate a real house address (even though it might have been a lie, and he was actually headed for another building) - and looked the part - do you think he would have been let through? Of course not, but a war veteran missing a leg, wanting to pass by and return to his house (which had been searched that morning, so nobody else was there matching the jackal's description) his story had to be more complete and plausible, it's the name of the game, so to speak.

4. Simple - he didn't know they were on to that name at the time, and it's about 'staying in character'. Nobody was looking for Per Lyndqvist the Danish schoolteacher, they were looking for a fair haired Englishman. Even breaking his fake identity, slipping just once, could be fatal, so to all and sundry, he used that name at that time. Imagine something like being stopped by police, and he hands over documents, whilst with the guy he met in the bath-house, if they noticed the discrepancy and told the police (god knows why they would, but just hypothetically) - well that'd be grounds for detaining him, and they wouldn't take long to work out he had dyed hair etc...

reply

I could never understand why he sought cover in the apartment of his turkish bath 'encounter' when he could have easily used the top floor apartment for which he had the key and knew the housekeepers rountine. Especially when he knew the owners were on holiday. He was drawn into at least 2 murders that could have got him arrested.

reply

there are many reasons why he couldnt go there! they where searching all the houses and apartments so he couldnt go there until the last minute.. he needed somewhere safe to stay until then. his disguise was enough to fool one regular street cop but probably wouldnt of stood up to closer scrutiny. plus when they searched the apartments the old lady would of told the police the apartments where empty.. if he was found in a room she would of also known he wasnt a tenant and he couldnt of killed her too soon because that would of also aroused suspicion.

reply

[deleted]

# 3 is not a mistake. When he's disguised as the old one legged veteran, he has to tell the Gendarme where he's going as well as show him ID with that address to be allowed past the barriers. If he hadn't (supposedly) lived in that building, he'd have been turned away until after the cerimony.

The flick was just on cable, and it's clear that the forger produced the ID with the old vet's identity, photo and the address of the building the Jackal was going to shoot from. This is in the same scene when they talk about ingesting cordite to cause the skin to look gray rather than use make up when he wants to look like the old vet. The forger also mentions an associate in Paris having to pick a pocket to see an original to work from, presumably referring to the old documents a man of the vet's age would have.

reply

The movie is made in a near impeccable way. Realism and attention to detail are its remarkable features. But there is one last thing nagging me. After the killer is ready with his rifle on the top apartment of the building, the assistant commissioner particularly checks with the same guard who the killer had shown his ID and passed!! Dont you think it couldnt be so random and right at the same time?
There were guards swarming around the ceremony and the investigator bumps right into the guard who is the only one to know about the one legged vet!
I feel this could never have happened and the director turned to this goof in the last minute because our killer was so perfect that he could not make anymore mistakes.
If in fact such a story takes place anywhere, I feel the killer will have to succeed and so he will.

reply

I was just about to make a post about this.

I know this is thread necroposting, but I can't help but feel as if you hit the nail on the head as to why I had to minus points from this movie getting a perfect 10.

Everything about this movie was nearly pitch perfect save for that Deus Ex Machina ending. There's no way that street cop would have instantly remembered everything about the old man to know what building and floor. It was also unbelievably random that the detective would spot out that one floor with that one room with that one open window.

There should have been one other giveaway other than the random encounter. That's not to mention that they delayed the Jackal getting in a shot on the prez in order to give the detective time to come in and stop him.

I cringed at that last part.

reply

It's not co-incidence Lebel encountered the policeman who let the Jackal through because Lebel was doing the rounds checking with everyone. Those cut scenes, for many minutes prior, show the precautions Lebel and others were taking. But for the sake of a movie climax the camera didn't bore us by sticking on just the detective, going from cop to cop checking in with them.

There's nothing to suggest the open window caused any suspicion until AFTER the policeman told Lebel that he'd let through a foreign cripple war veteran, who may or may not have been a shape-shifting fugitive. We might assume the cop on the street let only this one distinctive person through the barrier in the last hour, so we'd have to question the believability of him being a halfway-useful cop if he couldn't recall this. The detective knows what he's looking for - he's trying to think where he himself would be if he wanted to assassinate de Gaulle - so any open window up high in the vicinity of where a member of public passed the barrier would be absolutely screaming for his attention.

As an aside, I watched this film just now for the first time, and am blown away by it! Attention to detail is superb, the realism puts to shame any other similar movie I've seen this decade, camerawork immerses me completely, and the amount of tension (without relying on action) is tremendous. Except for when the Jackal actually gets launched up into the air from a burst of 9mm sub-machinegun. Wut?!.

reply

[deleted]

Regarding 2
2. Maybe you have never stayed in a hotel in Europe, but it is normal to hand over your passport to the clerk. It is not possible to avoid this if you are foreigner. If you are native, you have to have an identity card. I didn't see if he handed the passport in the movie though.

reply

I was in Europe three months after you posted this for nine days, in four countries, England, France, Germany and Poland, staying at five hotels and not once did I have to turn over my passport.

This will be the high point of my day; it's all downhill from here.

reply

But you were in Europe in the 2010's and the film is set in the early 1960's, when you'd have had trouble getting into Poland at all. In those days it was entirely usual to show or even surrender your passport to the hotel for the duration of your stay. Nowadays European citizens are often not required to show passports even at national borders.

reply

[deleted]

"1. Why drive like a banshee after you've painted your car and have new license plates?"

That was an irritaing diversion from the original story. Certainly he would've been enough a professional as to not get involved in a car accident.
In the book he deliberately dumps the car after he's informed that the police know what he's driving. He paints it blue to get out of immediate danger than leaves it in a forest.

reply

My thinking was that he intended to get as much distance between himself and the estate as he could before having to dump the car (since he wasn't able to alter his appearance yet). He was also noticeably tired/shaken while he was driving, so this may have made him less likely to notice just how fast he was going. Also, the white car he hit was driving on the wrong side of the road at the time, and rounding a blind corner, so its driver was the one mostly at fault.

reply

I can't recall but could the car that he hit been on the correct side of the road rounding the corner (it was in France, correct?) and the Jackal got careless about which side of the road HE was supposed to be on?

reply

Nah, I saw the film just before I posted that and the Jackal was clearly on the right side, whereas the white car had cut the corner, moving over to the left. In fact, here ya go: http://img257.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=27931_jackalss_122_355lo.jpg

reply

That's pretty clear that the other guy was cutting the corner, what an idiot. (-:
Just wanted to be sure that they drove on the right side in France and they do- usually.

reply

Just looked at the image posted. Note that there is a warning sign that the road narrows (to a single lane?) so the car coming the other way may have had little choice, in which case it was the Jackal's speeding that caused the accident.

reply

Somehow I missed that tiny sign (as did apparently the Jackal!)- but what a ludicrous French traffic set-up that was! The Jackal speeding or not doesn't that sign seem to be placed absurdly close to anyone approaching that corner, so that even someone driving at a slower speed would hardly have much time to react?

I propose that scene scenario was the film's mistake and not the Jackal's! (-:

reply

[deleted]

1. He wasn't driving like a banshee, just fast; I do it myself when it's safe because I too drive an Alfa. Besides, the cops were looking for a WHITE Alfa Romeo with different plates. Anybody with an Alfa would be expected to drive con brio.
2. You can't register legally in France without presenting your identity papers--in the Jackal's case, his passport-- so that your stay can be recorded, Police state? Maybe.
3. He had to tell the Paris cop his address so he could get through the cordon. This is something he scouted out in advance, and his false documents reflected this, precisely so he could make it through the cordon.
4. Why not? Per Lundquist was his cover and, as far as he knew, unlikely to be blown. Even if it was, how likely was the guy in the street to pay attention to a nation-wide alarm? Not much more likely than today.

No plot holes.

reply

Bravissimo! I've owned two 101.18 Spiders. The engines have no bottom end torque, so the only way to drive them is to rev the heck out of them. Plus it sounds cool. See: http://acme-ltd.com/Satch/Satch.html.
Lou

reply

I just got back from France. No one asked me for a passport at any hotel. A bigger plot hole is why there wasn't a huge manhunt and alert for Duggan as soon as he hit the country, but they waited until he killed the Baroness. There are murders everyday in France and they could have just said they were searching for him because of an ax murder in Nice or Marseille or they could have just made up a murder to justify a big search without letting anyone think it had to do with De Gaulle.

reply