Also the plot of WEB is deliciously complicated
Only for the first half of the film. The set-up is great, but once all the main villains are killed in one fell swoop the movie becomes Eastwood and Burton vs. faceless Nazi hordes, which isn't really that much better than the modern-day action tripe you pretend to despise.
Anyway, the Pirates of the Caribbean films have very "complicated" plots, I somehow don't suppose you would consider them good.
(despite what the previous dope said.)
Real classy. But now I can dispense with being civil with you.
Very few 30-year-old children could follow it.
There's a poster like this on every classic movie board on IMDB. Are people of your ilk always pretentious, pseudo-intellectual bullies who insult everyone who dares disagree with you? Or is it just a bad habit? I gave up trying to impress people with my knowledge of older films when I turned 18. This isn't Citizen Kane or The Godfather, its a movie where Clint Eastwood and Richard Burton run around shooting, stabbing and blowing up Nazis for two hours, so such condescension isn't really called for. The film is miles better than Transformers or 300, but that's about as fair a comparison as comparing, say, Doubt or The Assassination of Jesse James etc. to one of the old Beach Party films or Roger Corman schlockfests.
The Guns of Navarone is far better than Where Eagles Dare in pretty much every respect, although I don't think Navarone has a scene the equivalent of Burton's big scene explaining the plot.
Whatever happens, we have got/The Maxim Gun, and they have not!
reply
share