What was the point of the car chase?
It just seemed it was put in for audience excitement but had no relevance to the story.
shareIt just seemed it was put in for audience excitement but had no relevance to the story.
shareShows Bullitt's metal so to speak. His ability, his courage, etc. dealing with danger. It removes bad guys, too.
CC:https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/28/b3/81/28b3814d7598e079965170c781cf7dc8.jpg
Or his mettle.
share"It just seemed it was put in for audience excitement but had no relevance to the story."
I think you, sort of, answered your own question there, bubba. Good work!
Yes, it was definitely put in for audience excitement, and it worked on that level even compared to the ludicrous car chases they put in today's movies (I'm talking about you Bourne Identity). However, the Bullitt car chase was set up badly and seemingly without any thought to logical story progression. I mean, the bad guys were tailing Bullitt the whole time he took his cab ride with Robert Duval, and yet the moment he gets back to his Mustang and spots them, they high tail it outta there. Why were they following him in the first place? Within the story context I suppose it was in order to make sure he didn't learn that the Ross that had been killed was a decoy. But what was their ultimate motive? Were they going to kill Bullitt if he found out about the fake Ross? Wouldn't they have just killed him anyway? A couple mob hitmen that've just shot a witness and a cop wouldn't stop there. Why not kill Bullitt while he's cruising around in the cab? Because the filmmakers wanted that car chase. But it could have been set up better, even marginally so. Say the hitmen wait for Bullitt to get back to his Mustang then take a shot at him and miss and he shoots back and misses and then they're off and the chase is on. Even that would be dopey because really, they should have got him while he was in the cab. Anyway, the chase was pretty cool, even if the whole movie before that was kind of slow. But that was pacing back then. And the airport chase and shootout was superb. I can't help feeling that Michael Mann took some of that for his final scene in Heat (which was also superb).
share...the bad guys were tailing Bullitt the whole time he took his cab ride with Robert Duval, and yet the moment he gets back to his Mustang and spots them, they high tail it outta there.Well first off, you're misstating the sequence a bit. Once Bullitt is back in his own car at the carwash, they continue tailing him. It's only after he pulls the switcheroo and turns up behind them on 20th St. that "they high tail it outta there."
Why were they following him in the first place? Within the story context I suppose it was in order to make sure he didn't learn that the Ross that had been killed was a decoy. But what was their ultimate motive? Were they going to kill Bullitt if he found out about the fake Ross?No, there's no reason to assume they had any idea about the decoy. They were simply trying to finish the job they were hired to do, as they attempted to do in the hospital, and were presumably hoping Bullitt would lead them to where he was being hidden after being moved (his death was being kept secret from everyone, so they wouldn't have been aware of that either).
Oh yeah! You're right. They don't high tail it outta there till they see him behind them. Then the driver looks panicked and hits the gas. I forgot that part. But really, they didn't do a great job in the first place did they?
shareBut really, they didn't do a great job in the first place did they?Pretty fair statement.
Like any other profession, that of "hit man" isn't exempt from screw-ups (something borne out time and again in real life).
But really, they didn't do a great job in the first place did they
For the sake of bitchin-ness!
shareIf we look at it from a police procedural point of view, Bullitt's motive for chasing the two suspected hitmen seems slapdash at best, murderous at worst. What was his goal? Did he want them to stop? What would he have done if they had? Effectively, he's a plainclothed police officer in an unmarked car chasing two suspects at high speed without any indication such as a flashing light, which was highly dangerous to other road users. Then he runs them off the road at that same speed into a petrol station which explodes. In real life, numerous civilians would have been killed and injured, whilst the suspects were not treated with the basic rights they needed under the US criminal justice system of the time.
Yes, this was just for excitement. It's no better than most other Hollywood police films which present the police perspective without criticism.
"Yes, this was just for excitement."
- From a marketing standpoint, quite so, just as with switching the locale in the novel from New York to hip, counterculture San Francisco and altering the main character from a tired, on-the-verge-of-retirement detective to a younger one with a rebellious, maverick quality (and a beautiful girlfriend).
"It's no better than most other Hollywood police films which present the police perspective without criticism."
- There's actually some subtext offering criticism of Bullitt's single-minded pursuit of the hit men. When the supposed witness dies and Bullitt smuggles his body out of the hospital and covers up his demise, he emphatically tells the doctor, "If Chalmers finds out that Ross died, he'll fold this up and I want the man that killed him." This is the first signal that Bullitt is going to start bending rules and skirting procedure in order to nab the assassins before Chalmers can use his public platform to escape embarrassment by blaming police for the whole fiasco (as Chalmers has indeed explicitly warned him).
That subtext is eventually articulated by Cathy when she confronts Frank on the roadside with her observation that he's becoming desensitized to violence, and expresses her concerns over what the job is doing to him. Those concerns, and the thematic subtext they represent, play out after Bullitt has tracked the real Ross - who engineered the entire impersonation/assassination scheme - to the airport and spooks him into fleeing by boarding the plane as passengers are returning to the terminal, initiating another public-endangering pursuit and culminating in a shootout and two more deaths.
And it's this subtext that underlies the final scene, in which Bullitt gazes introspectively into his bathroom mirror while Cathy sleeps peacefully in the adjacent bedroom, and the film concludes on a symbol of violence: Frank's gun and holster.
Thanks for that thoughtful reply. Despite my numerous viewings of this film, I hadn't seen that subtext which is, as you point out, critical of Bullitt's methods.
shareAnd thank you.
I think among the reasons the film has maintained its popularity and achieved iconic status is its buffet-like layout of elements appealing to viewers of differing tastes. The subtext is there if one wants it, but it's just as easy to ignore, and along the way, it supplies two big outdoor action sequences, two suspenseful indoor pursuits, plenty of sober investigative detail, political maneuvering, a touch of romantic glamour and miles of "cool."
Two high-powered autos bouncing over hills and careening along highways is a big selling point, but in recent years, I've begun to find the two-stage airport pursuit the more satisfying of the two. In spite of the visual - and literal - momentum of the auto chase, it really does put the narrative momentum on hold for those eleven minutes while we take time out for crowd-pleasing action. But it is entertaining, and provides the film with nice punctuation in the form of a mid-point lift after all that investigative procedure and footwork. It is, after all, a movie, and switching rhythmic gears in that way makes for engaging drama every bit as much as galloping horses, zooming warplanes, swashbuckling acrobatics or any other larger-than-life elements that have always filled theater seats.
I dont suppose it was ever meant to make sense, just a reason to have an exciting car chase.
It was common for films of that era to have such sequences where a cop would chase someone down mercilessly for something trivial, and cause untold damage and mayhem in the process. And often with little or no regard for human life, including civilians.
Similarly, cops would think nothing of having gun battles with villains on crowded streets. The overriding factor back then was to either stop or kill the perpetrator by any means necessary.
Although Bullitt by no means invented the cinematic urban auto pursuit, a great deal of the responsibility for the device becoming so popularized in succeeding years can be laid at its feet (or wheels), for better or worse. Once something like that is made a centerpiece in such a spectacular fashion, others will inevitably try to top or at least match it. And sometimes, those attempts have been made by the very same people: Bullitt producer Philip D'Antoni also brought us The French Connection and The Seven-Ups.
shareAnd that green VW bug was in half the car chase scenes! Look out for it.
shareThe chase was also there because everyone in the audience knew it was Steve McQueen doing his own driving (and he probably WANTED to have the scene in the movie!) The audience knows that
Jackie Chan and Tom Cruise do their own stunts, and that knowledge puts more asses in theater seats. The worse Jackie Chan got hurt making a movie, the better the film’s BO. It’s human nature.
I regret that McQueen and Paul Newman never had a V8 showdown with each other on film. They were 2 sexy, handsome top-of-the-A-list MOVIE STARS and I bet every theater seat occupied by a lady would have been soaked.
might as well ask the point of any action scene
shareCar chase scenes were new and exciting at that time.
shareTo counterbalance that 4min scene featuring a fax machine
share