Roger Ebert gave this ZERO stars?!!?!?

Roger Ebert was a grade A JackAss. Glad he is out of the picture. Enough said.

3 1/2 stars....


http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/wait-until-dark-1968

Ebert also gave zero stars to BLUE VELVET.

There are so many posts in this thread pointing out the FACT that Ebert gave it 3.5 stars out of 4.
The OP is an idiot, his thread title is misleading and I once again laugh at the douches who at once leap at the opportunity to throw craps at film critics.

Roger Ebert did NOT give this zero stars. Fact.
Roger Ebert wrote a pretty funny review concerning the fact that film's plot is a bit silly in that Hepburn's character doesn't lock doors. Fact.
Roger Ebert gave it 3.5 / 4. Fact.

Threads like this just creeps me out.
I never see threads informing us how Roger Ebert praised a film and most agree.
It's always something like: "Oh look! He didn't like this movie boohoo, critics are worst! Ebert is a hack! Boohoo"

Yeah, I don't blame him to be honest

I saw this movie as a kid and it stuck with me as one of the silliest movies that I ever watched. I searched it up all these years later and saw a rating of 7.9 so I can respect Ebert for giving it what he felt it deserved (which isnt much).

I read his review and he gave it ***1/2. Not sure where you got this zero stars nonsense. His only problem was she didn't lock the door. He says that four or five times in the review.









--------------------------------
I did sixty in five minutes once...

Well, the film has now an updated review in his site, and he gives the film a 3.5/4 stars rating.

Roger Ebert gave this 3.5/4 stars? What are you on about??

Favorite films of all time list
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls031708001