MovieChat Forums > McLintock! (1963) Discussion > Cringe inducing and so STUPID

Cringe inducing and so STUPID


It's a train wreck. Works the way The Brady Bunch does in inducing a great amount of CRINGE while watching it. Maureen O'hara is just possibly the WORST actress in cinema history. Every expression and flinch exaggerated and over the top. She makes sure the camera sees her getting mad, sees her getting jealous and sees her muffling a giggle. Of course she goes through the glass without a cut on her in her attempt to get away from a drunken John Wayne. Townspeople don't care if Wayne stomps and walks all over their cakes and food in rough pursuit of this hot tempered irish bad acting redhead.

O'hara lands in a wooden bathtub where she's mocked and laughed at by the town trollop. She grabs the woman's arm and dumps her in the water for laughing at her, where as John Wayne does the same.

Stephanie Powers walks through this movie with that "I'm in a big movie with big stars look" that makes you just wanna pull her hair. It would be fitting with the kind of misogyny in this film.

reply

And what's AMAZING is you are complaining about her "OVERACTING" when she was a "BIG TOWN WOMAN" who was supposed to make EVERYONE know JUST THAT!!! Maybe you should stick to episodes of the SIMPSONS genius!

Or are you going to ACTING SCHOOL and willing to tell us all about it? MORON!

reply

"People, people, people!" to quote Drago before he hit the mud for the umpteenth time.

It's a COMEDY! It's "The Taming of the Shrew" ("10 Things I Hate About You" for those under 25). I abhor the deification of the old, rich, anti-intellectual, antigovernment, rigidly individualistic white male and the quiet misogyny that accompanies it, but it was 1963!

1963 was two years after director Blake Edwards' repulsive, racist characterization of Mr. Yunioshi by Micky Rooney in "Breakfast at Tiffany's," the 13th highest grossing film of 1961. Upon its release, the NYT review covered that with just "Mickey Rooney's bucktoothed, myopic Japanese is broadly exotic." The times were not yet a-changin'. "McLintock!" was released 9 days before JFK was shot, 3 months before the Beatles arrived in the US. It was a very different world.

Without even going into who did and who did not have disposable income to see movies in theatres in 1963, it's also a ROM-COM! Are there SMART romantic comedies?

If someone wants to bash the 52-year-old flick, s/he should be going after John Wayne's determination to beat his personal values (back to inflexible individualism again) into the audience, after Batjac, Wayne's production company which made it, and the producer, Michael Wayne (John's son), who hired TV Western director Andrew V. McLaglen, the man who would have told O'Hara to overact. Her work in Miracle on 34th Street, How Green Is My valley, The Quiet Man, The Parent Trap, and others does not show her to chronically overact. Stefanie Powers was just getting started in Hollywood and still learning her craft and role in the obviously male-run TV & film industry.

reply

Yeah, but what did you REALLY think about the movie?

reply

I would not say the film is stupid but I agree its over the top. There were certain scenes where it felt ridiculous such when the Indian would appear complaining there is no whiskey.

"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not".

reply

To the OP:

Funny, the title of this thread is an apt description of your "review"...You absolutely trash the two main female leads in the movie. You call one the worse actress in cinema history (Which is pretty stupid and over the top), express a desire to physically injure the other (cringe-inducing), but then you accuse the MOVIE of being misogynistic?

It's a broad, campy, 1960's comedy loosely based on the Taming of the Shrew. In such a format, it doesn't make much sense for the actress playing the "Shrew" to behave in a low-key, rational manner, now does it? As far as your rage at Stephanie Powers...seems rather irrational.





reply

A good summation. In essence this is an extended slapstick comedy and if one isn't into this type of humor you're probably not going to like it.

Perhaps Maureen O'Hara over does it as "the shrew", but it is in keeping with the spirit and tenor of the film.

I wouldn't describe it as a great comedy-western, but it's enjoyable and has held up rather well over the years.

reply

EXCELLENT REPLY!! I LOVE this movie and have seen it over TEN TIMES!! I think Maureen O'Hara and Stephanie Powers are a THOUSAND TIMES better actresses than MEryl Streep or Candice Bergen or any of those modern day actresses

reply

Don't let the OP troll you- he just wants to get under your skin. He's a nitwit.

"It ain't dying I'm talking about, it's LIVING!"
Captain Augustus McCrae

reply

I agree. The humor is lame and far too cutesy in its presentation. And if you don't realize that something is supposed to be funny the awful score pounds a reminder into your brain. It was particularly ridiculous in the mudfight scene. O'Hara isn't really the worst actress in history, but she should have been embarrassed by her performance here. The movie is dreadful and among Wayne's worst.

reply


For the haters of this movie, you obviously take yourselves and the value of your "insights" way too seriously. When I watch a film like this I don't look at it for hidden meanings or anything so cerebral...it's more like was it entertaining? YES is the only answer that applies. It's funny in both the slapstick and verbal aspects and is one of The Duke's best ever. As for the ladies in th movie, the only under used one was DeCarlo...would like to have seen more scenes with her.


"If you give a mouse a cookie...it's gonna want a glass of milk."

reply

It's funny, but McLintock! is one of the best western comedies in history, and your snarky remarks about its being "a train wreck" are NOT going to change that.

So you didn't like it? Many, many women loved this movie, including the girl I took to the theater to see it. It is a clever adaptation of "The Taming of the Shrew" in a western setting. What didn't you like about it? Oh yes. You said that Maureen O'Hara is "just possibly the worst actress in cinema history." The lady has appeared in 65 films and numerous TV programs, both before and after McLintock! Some of TPTB in Hollywood probably disagree with you that Maureen is "the worst actress in cinema history." You know more than they do?

Face it, you are in the minority on this issue.


Gabe

reply

"She makes sure the camera sees her getting mad, sees her getting jealous and sees her muffling a giggle."


Oh my god! I can't believe that an actress would actually make sure the camera recorded her facial expresssions during a scene.

hkfilmnews.blogspot.com
porfle.blogspot.com

reply

[deleted]