Louise's little typo


Did anybody notice the monor typographical error Louise makes when she's typing the letter that her husband is supposed to have written to his mother?

reply

If I remember correctly, she types "willbe" instead of "will be". :)

reply

Yeah it's "willbe". Why is it in there? My guess is Coppola didn't have enough money to reshoot it so he left it in.

reply

It is "receive"

check it if you dont believe me

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

The whole typing-while-she's-reading-the-whole-letter-out-loud thing is pretty pointless. I wish Coppola would just let us read as she's typing, and then show just the completed letter instead of dumbing it down for us.

And I appreciate the folks who caught typos, but having Louise use a dictionary and eraser (had correction fluid even been invented yet?) wouldn't have advanced the narrative much, would it?

reply

My theory is that Coppola was setting the stage for dementia by showing the effect the death of her husband had on her.





"What contest in Hell did I win?" Frank Barone

** John K

reply

also there are two other errors in the film

When Louise goes into the water with the toys her underwear is white, but when she is in the water, they are blue.

and

At the beginning, on the boat with John, they talk about the will, and being left to charity under the 'Mysterious' name of Kathleen. Hmmmm....

reply

How can you tell they are blue?

reply



-AP3-

Step Brothers: tinyurl.com/stepb
Wanted: tinyurl.com/wantd

reply

They do look like a blue color bc not dark enough for black, either way they are not the sheer nude color ones she has on when she is walking to the pond. Anyone else shocked they killed her off so quick! I was a lil to be honest!

reply

I would imagine the whole film was probably shot in 2 days for $100 so there was no time or money for re-shoots!

reply

What's the big deal with us hearing the words instead of just seeing them? It's a staple in movies. Often, I see films in which people are speaking aloud as they type on computers, sometimes throwing in other comments. How many of us ever do anything like that? It seems to be an odd cinematic habit that is quite widespread.

By the way, I'm watching it right now on THIS channel after not having seen it for several years.

I was just giggling over the voiceover of the letter, whether she's actually saying the words aloud or we're hearing her thoughts, as in the other narration. I keep a film journal, and I even started jotting down instances of this occurring, as it happens so often. One of the best is Whoopi Goldberg in "Jumpin' Jack Flash".

~~MystMoonStruck~~

reply

Another, more recent film where it happens is "The Dying Gaul," which involves an Internet chat relationship between two characters, one of whom is masquerading as someone else:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0384929/

There you see them beginning to type, but they're voicing the entire chat because presumably it would get pretty boring and a lot slower just reading the words. Great film!

reply

[deleted]

Yes, and I've also noticed yours.

"I'll book you. I'll book you on something. I'll find something in the book to book you on."

reply

Isn't it ironic?

reply

[deleted]

Oh yes, I'm all over the map, and all over the boards. Just like you! ;-)

reply

[deleted]

That's too bad ... I think!

reply

[deleted]

Did anyone notice your minor typo?

Help stamp out and do away with superfluous redundancy

reply

I noticed it but didnt think it a big deal. You couldn't press backspace on a type writer and so with a small insignificant error like that I assume most people would just let it be instead of re writing the entire thing over something so small...so maybe that's why he left it bc it wasn't important or a big deal

reply