MovieChat Forums > West Side Story (1961) Discussion > Natalie Wood STUNK in this film!

Natalie Wood STUNK in this film!


I don't know what any of the rest of you are thinking, but she was AWFUL!!! And Richard Beymer wasn't much better. And George Chakiris was too slight, pretty, and effeminate to be convincing. After Jimmy Dean died -- aside from Brando, Clift, McQueen and Beatty -- all that was left were lightweights.

reply

hired more for her fresh looks and right off Splendor in the Grass, she was a litle affected in this & self conscious, it was a great polished effort but yes Rita srtole the show.

reply

I liked her performance for the most part but it was pretty uneven at times.

Esta es mi firma


reply

Natalie Wood is PERFECT. In anything. Period.

reply

To each their own, but I kind of liked Natalie Wood in the film version of West Side Story. I thought she did okay as Maria. As for Richard Beymer, well...given the fact that the Beymer-bashing really has gotten out of hand in some circles, I'm more willing to give him the benefit of the doubt than I previously was. Imho, directorial constraints put on him by Robert Wise, the way in which both the scripts for the original Broadway stage versions and the film versions of West Side Story had been written, and the fact that Natalie Wood showed such open hostility and resentment towards him during the filming of WSS (Natalie Wood actually did attempt to get Richard Beymer kicked off the set on several occasions!) all hampered him from playing an even stronger Tony with a bit more of an "edge".

As for George Chakiris's role as the Shark gangleader, Bernardo, I thought he was excellent and did a fabulous job playing Bernardo, and he wasn't effeminate at all, imho.

reply

I wouldn't say Wood "stunk," but she was wooden and didn't really do anything special with the role and was miscast.

---
Emojis=💩 Emoticons=

reply

I've always thought that Natalie Wood was very good in a thankless role. The music,the dancing,the set design are all great, but in "West Side Story",Natalie Wood lingers in my memory.










Just because something can't be explained,doesn't mean it becomes yours!

Being Human

reply

I'm completely baffled at how anyone can say Natalie is wooden or terrible in the movie. She is the opposite of wooden. She brought emotional power and expression to the key scenes.

reply

They obviously didn't see the same movie we did.

"DON'T YOU TOUCH HIM!!!!!"

If that is "wooden", I'm Whistler's Mother.

reply

This whole film stinks.


To each their own, Feologlid! I, along most people here on this board, disagree with you, that's all.

reply

I could not agree more with OP. In fact not just Natalie but this whole movie STUNK! I think people think she is a great actress because she died so early, lol. How stupid is that? Only people who are gonna love it are clueless teenagers with stupid dreams of getting married with a prince charming who looks like Richard or bored housewives who hate their husbands. I don't see any genuinely intelligent person who has grown to love the original play of Shakespeare finding it as anything less than travesty; thankfully the Bard didn't live to watch it. Morons posting here about how great this is should read the original play then watch Franco Zeffirelli's movie to see how Romeo and Juliet actually behaved (they certainly did not behave like numbskulls as they do in this movie).

I never liked Wood much anyhow, she did not even look like Juliet (Olivia Hussey did), and on top of that, she was so *beep* WOODEN in every movie she starred in - I guess she'd got a real good manager for herself who brought her such terrific roles even though she herself was, ironically, so terrible in them. And when such stinking pile of poop gets a rating of 8 on imbd, you can be confident that the country is *beep* Rita Moreno was the only good thing about this movie: she tried hard to bring a semblance of reality into this dumb movie. Oh and I have never heard more boring songs in my life; so far as musicals are concerned I would any day watch Wizard of Oz than this - at least Judy Garland sang her own songs (oh and she too died early, but was a much BETTER actress than the 'WOODEN' Wood)! All the while I basically TOLERATED (rather than enjoyed) this boring movie because I was waiting to stumble upon at least ONE clue that would tell me why this movie is rated so high here. Boy, was I disappointed!

reply

I hope you feel better now.

I never liked Wood much anyhow, she did not even look like Juliet (Olivia Hussey did)


Pretty stupid thing to say. Juliet and Maria are not the same person.

Juliet: 13 year old Italian. Juliet has pale skin.

Maria: 16-18 year old Puerto Rican. Maria has darker skin.

But there's really not much of a physical description of Juliet in the Shakespeare's play. So I'm not sure how you would know that Olivia Hussey looked like Juliet. Of course, in the original production Juliet would have been played by an English boy or young man who presumably did not really look all that much like Juliet either.

[Just as an aside - you compare Natalie unfavorably to Judy Garland in the Wizard of Oz, but you have to know that Judy didn't really look much like Dorothy in the Oz books.]

Natalie was cast as Maria because they thought they needed a box office draw. Natalie was not a great actress, but she was good enough to play this role.

reply

Natalie was not a great actress, but she was good enough to play this role.


That's spot-on, pontevedro! Thanks.

reply

She made me cry and laugh in lots of films so she was able to get a rise out of people and was a very professional, beautiful actress.

I just love it when people come here and bash her who haven't accomplished one quarter of one ounce of what she did in her life. Jealousy, that's all. :)

reply