I haven't entirely figured out what the game plan is at Turner Classic Movies this July, but I do know this:
On Wednesday nights, they are running Hitchcock movies in chronological order, back to back. They did a bunch of his silents the other night. In a few(two?) weeks, I see that the four for the night will be The Big Four
Vertigo
North by Northwest
Psycho
The Birds
...and in that order. I don't know if the series ends with those, or if there is room in August for Marnie through Family Plot.
THAT said...they just ran Psycho last night.
---
Meanwhile, TCM is somehow tying all these screenings into a TCM "internet class" that sounds(via the commercials) a lot like what we do here. I haven't signed up, I'm not sure I want to jump in such a big pond.
---
But wait, there's more. Hitch has to share honors with Orson Welles and some other film notables, but TCM is also now bottling a Hitchcock WINE, fresh outta Napa, with a Vertigo-styled label. They have commercials about THAT, too. (Along with the commercials about the Hitchcock film festival, and the commercials about the Hitchcock internet class...)
Good to know! I'll keep an eye on that channel since I've been wanting to rewatch Vertigo for quite awhile now.
---
Its on Wednesday in a coupla weeks -- at least. There may be other showings.
Its always interesting when Turner Classic Movies runs a Hitchcock festival. For the TCM Hitchcock library consists only of those MGM and Warner Brothers movies Ted Turner originally bought to LAUNCH TCM, which meant North by Northwest(Hitchs only MGM film) and five Hitchcock Warners films (Stage Fright, Strangers on a Train, I Confess, Dial M for Murder and The Wrong Man.)
To get Vertigo, Psycho, Rear Window and The Birds into the mix, TCM has to "rent out" the Universal/Paramount package owned by Universal.
In the 90's, Universal wouldn't even rent those films to TCM. Universal elected instead to ship them to the "original" American Movie Classics channel, back when that channel ran old movies without commercials, uncut. Those days at American Movie Classics(now AMC) are long over(AMC runs newer films, cut to pieces with commercials), so Universal is willing to rent their Hitchcock package(occasionally) to TCM.
As a simile to the "TCM Summer Hitchcock Festival," I'm reminded that Sirius radio now has an exclusive "Beatles Channel" that opened for business in June and which I'm listening to all the time. It took Sirius over 15 years to get Paul and Ringo to agree to a channel; now that its here...its a glorious review of our Baby Boomer youths and the incredible "changeable" nature of the Beatles over time.
But here's the thing: much as The Beatles are a rock act unto their own and above and beyond their 60's peers; Hitchcock is a movie act unto his own and above and beyond his multi-decade peers(especially from 1951 through 1963.) TCM in running a July Hitchcock festival(complete with internet interaction for chat) is acknowledging Hitchcock's special pull on multiple generations.
I guess he's not quite Charles Dickens or Mark Twain just yet. Hitchcock's cinematic movies are very much relevant TODAY.
The Beatles are a rock act unto their own and above and beyond their 60's peers
The Beatles began as rock and rollers but with George Martin's guidance in the studio proved to have such fanstatic open-ness to new ideas and alternative (sometimes much older, sometimes wildly foreign) musics that at least until the end of 1967 they're positive wonders. Their signature is their bounding-ahead-ness, their absorbing more and more music influences, and that it all seemed to be accelerating... This perod climaxes in 1967's fantastic creativity of Sgt Peppers, the Strawberry Fields/penny Lane single, the Magic Mystery Tour album and Film (w/ ultra-experimental classics like Fool On A Hill and I am The Walrus), and the All You Need Is Love single and world-wide video-hook-up. The Beatles couldn't keep that pace and acceleration going, and The White Album and everything after is much more fragmented, often solo-ish, disgruntled, tentative, retrenching. The spell is broken. From 1968 onwards every new Rolling Stones album is better than every new Beatles album (completely reversing previous form), every new Pink Floyd or Led Zep or Who or Buffalo Springfield album is more interesting than every new Beatles record, and so on.
Ultimately that 5 years of spiraling upwards Beatles brilliance from 1963-1967 was almost too great. It *was* the greatest show on Earth while it lasted, but Rock and Roll itself - the Beatles' starting-point - couldn't really settle down and come into its own until it was over.
I wonder whether the careers of people like Preston Sturges and Coppola and Lucas and Godard are perhaps better film-analogues of the Beatles than Hitchcock. Those guys did amazingly distinctive things for a little less than a decade each and then were largely done. They feel locked in their periods a little like The Beatles do. Hitchcock is perhaps more like James Brown or Bowie or Neil Young or Dylan or Lou Reed with their long careers and persisting influence becoming building blocks for generations of subsequent musicians.
reply share
The Beatles are a rock act unto their own and above and beyond their 60's peers
The Beatles began as rock and rollers but with George Martin's guidance in the studio proved to have such fanstatic open-ness to new ideas and alternative (sometimes much older, sometimes wildly foreign) musics that at least until the end of 1967 they're positive wonders.
---
The Beatles channel on Sirius was active the first week in June so they did a "50 year anniversary special " on Sgt Pepper that made the case that this was a revolutionary album that changed everything for ALL rock groups.
Funny, listening to the special, I couldn't help recall that Psycho was considered a revolutionary movie that changed everything for ALL filmmakers.
In both cases, the artists were well established and famous, but they elected to take things up a BIG notch.
---
Their signature is their bounding-ahead-ness, their absorbing more and more music influences, and that it all seemed to be accelerating...
---
I can only come at this from the "mainstream" and well-known angle that the Beatles were incredible in how they morphed, year by year, album by album, record by record, into a DIFFERENT BAND, almost once a year. Personally, I like the early rock and roll better -- these were the fun dance songs of my childhood. Things started gettin' kinda arty around Rubber Soul, and just advanced in that direction year after year til psychedelia, drug influences and everything else seemed to explode the Beatles very persona. They HAD to break up.
This perod climaxes in 1967's fantastic creativity of Sgt Peppers, the Strawberry Fields/penny Lane single, the Magic Mystery Tour album and Film (w/ ultra-experimental classics like Fool On A Hill and I am The Walrus), and the All You Need Is Love single and world-wide video-hook-up.
----
Shall I note that 1967 was that big "movie year too" -- Bonnie and Clyde and The Graduate and all the rest(2017 is BIG for 50 year 1967 anniversaries.)
Dare I note that in Los Angeles and New York City, at least -- Psycho FINALLY got a TV debut and wracked up big ratings and countless playground recitations of fear. Psycho was big all over again in '67.
The Beatles couldn't keep that pace and acceleration going, and The White Album and everything after is much more fragmented, often solo-ish, disgruntled, tentative, retrenching.
---
I've read that little of The White Album songs were recorded with all Beatles in the room; when/if they were, it was to put finishing touches on stuff done solo by the writers.
And George said: "The egos on The White Album! I mean, some of those songs should have been B-sides or elbowed off the album entirely." I disagree. I came to love all the songs on The White Album, from the big hits(USSR, Birthday Oob-La-Dee) to the very weird stuff(Everybody's Got Something to Hide Cept for Me and My Monkey.) And how can we forget: Charles Manson LOVED the White Album. He loved Harrison' "Piggies." He named one of his ladies "Sexy Sadie." And he envisioned "Helter Skelter."
---
The spell is broken. From 1968 onwards every new Rolling Stones album is better than every new Beatles album (completely reversing previous form), every new Pink Floyd or Led Zep or Who or Buffalo Springfield album is more interesting than every new Beatles record, and so on.
---
An interesting analysis. Still, it does seem that the Beatles were peaking as a focus of the entertainment press even at the end -- ESPECIALLY at the end. I th think Paul put out his first solo album before there was a final Beatles album, but its hard deciding on the final Beatles album. Abbey Road, or Let It Be? Let's go back to the high school arguments of '70!
Was the "Paul is Dead" craze while the Beatles were still functional? It sure added a macabre tone to the proceedings with the references to the possible coded songs -- I recall F. Lee Bailey did a "fake trial TV special" to "prove" if Paul was dead or not. They played the songs!
Years later, the grand irony: John WAS dead. Incontrovertibly. By yet another Norman Bates reality show.
Ultimately that 5 years of spiraling upwards Beatles brilliance from 1963-1967 was almost too great.
---
Note in passing: from when they hit the Sullivan show in 1964 to when Let it Be came out -- or whatever the final album was -- my family moved three times. So each new era of the Beatles found me in a different house in a different town with different friends. The songs easily conjure up any one of the three places I lived.
---
It *was* the greatest show on Earth while it lasted, but Rock and Roll itself - the Beatles' starting-point - couldn't really settle down and come into its own until it was over.
---
A great point. The Beatles couldn't be EVERYTHING. All these other artists had to emerge and make their own sound.
And for us kids, there was that brief interlude with...The Monkees. Red hot on TV for a mere two seasons, red hot in record sales until it all collapsed. Great pop tunes, tune, by Carole King and Neil Diamond among others.
---
I wonder whether the careers of people like Preston Sturges and Coppola and Lucas and Godard are perhaps better film-analogues of the Beatles than Hitchcock. Those guys did amazingly distinctive things for a little less than a decade each and then were largely done. They feel locked in their periods a little like The Beatles do. Hitchcock is perhaps more like James Brown or Bowie or Neil Young or Dylan or Lou Reed with their long careers and persisting influence becoming building blocks for generations of subsequent musicians.
---
I'll take the debate as you've staged it -- but I think the short-term Beatles and the long-term Hitchcock rather match up as huge, overwhelming influences on everybody else.
And this: for all the wonders of his silent, his British films, and his forties American films, perhaps Hitchcock's "Beatles period" was as short as the Beatles tenure -- 5 years from 1958 to 1963: Vertigo, NXNW, Psycho, The Birds...and a peaking TV show.
It's also good to see you on here. I'm sure you don't remember it, but many years ago you and I discussed Vertigo on IMDb. You have always had outstanding things to say. In fact, I just read your stellar comments on Hombre a few days ago under the thread "John Russel's Uncertain Certainty," and the depth of your analysis brought out nuances for me that multiplied my enjoyment of the film.
It's also good to see you on here. I'm sure you don't remember it, but many years ago you and I discussed Vertigo on IMDb.
---
It sounds familiar..I don't post on Vertigo nearly as much as on Psycho. I do believe they deleted one of my bigger posts on Vertigo, something humble like "What Vertigo Means." Hah.
In any event...hello, again! And please comment here at the Psycho board and elsewhere when you can. We NEED posters here!
--- , I just read your stellar comments on Hombre a few days ago under the thread "John Russel's Uncertain Certainty,"
---
Thank you very much for your kind words.
I just re-read it myself. That was one INTENSE thread, went on for years...is still going.
Tell you the truth, I'm not sure I could swing my participation in something that intense all these years later. I'm older than I used to be.
Also, I don't think moviechat.org is going to allow such long posts. With "newbies," maybe...but not with me. I'd have to break them up, as I do here.
Still...maybe John Russell's Uncertain Certainty will yield new gold from other posters...
It just goes to show that Psycho is NOT the only movie I can "dig deep in." I just think Psycho is the most famous one I can dig deep in. Plus, everybody gets that one film that is meaningful for reasons beyond "just the movie." I've documented my personal adventure with that movie here many a time.
And I tip of the hat to the key "Psycho - Hombre Connection": Martin Balsam. Like a star, Balsam is "the same but different" in the roles of Arbogast and Mendez. Black and white/color. Moustache,no moustache. Accent, no accent. Lives, dies.
But you can see Balsam's unique acting style in both films, his use of emphatic nods while he listens and before he speaks. His amiable yet firm delivery. His handsomeness in spite of some "body issues." And a great voice.
Please stick around here, PlatinumScreen. And at the Hombre board, too. I need to get around more!
ecarle, you're a class act! I plan to stick around here! I intentionally held back signing up anywhere after IMDb shut the boards down. I wanted to see who was breaking away from the pack with some momentum, and I believe for the individual title boards that I want, Movie Chat is doing just that.
I admire Martin Balsam's work so much. The Decades Channel plays the old Studio One show from the 1950s late at night, and I just saw him on an episode (two-parter) that also starred Steve McQueen and William Shatner called "The Defender." It was a tense courtroom drama.
It's been years since I've watched Psycho. I need to brush up on it and join in on the fun at the board!
By the way, have you ever seen the documentary about Hitchcock called Dial H for Hitchcock? If not, it is fabulous and worth viewing. It's an obscure thing, so getting access to it might prove difficult.
I intentionally held back signing up anywhere after IMDb shut the boards down. I wanted to see who was breaking away from the pack with some momentum, and I believe for the individual title boards that I want, Movie Chat is doing just that.
---
Its the one I have chosen because , as a "low techie," its the easiest one to navigate...even as it places a limit on lengths of my posts.
I do regret that some of my favorite imdb posters don't come here often. I figure they are on those other boards. I'd better get learning how to navigate them better!
---
I admire Martin Balsam's work so much. The Decades Channel plays the old Studio One show from the 1950s late at night, and I just saw him on an episode (two-parter) that also starred Steve McQueen and William Shatner called "The Defender." It was a tense courtroom drama.
----
Who/what/where...how do I get The Decades Channel!
I believe that The Defender ended up as the pilot for The Defenders with EG Marshall and Robert Reed. I didn't know that McQueen and Balsam worked on that show, but clips of Young William Shatner were used in it to create flashbacks for Old William Shatner on the 00's series "Boston Legal." It was a great juxtaposition. One wondered how old lawyer Shatner could have been so good -- and we get clips of young lawyer Shatner to show us.
Martin Balsam was likely viewable by Hitchcock and screenwriter Joe Stefano a LOT in the late fifties as Psycho loomed into view as a movie project. Balsam was a familiar face, and one of perhaps 20 character actors available in 1959/60 who could play Arbogast. But Balsam got the part and "a star was born," I think. Suddenly he was in a movie seen by millions, and in a scene that terrified millions. He became very famous, and was thus hired even MORE in the years after Psycho.
But there's this: I've seen a lot of Martin Balsam's work, including his Oscar-winning turn in A Thousand Clowns, and Arbogast IS his best role. How Balsam looks at age 40(handsome, trim), the lines written for him, the acting partner (in the main) of Tony Perkins at HIS best, Hitchcock's direction of the visuals...Arbogast ends up being a great character above and beyond the rather sketchy backstory of the character.
---
It's been years since I've watched Psycho. I need to brush up on it and join in on the fun at the board!
---
A viewing's all it takes. Or just clips. They are all over Youtube.
----
By the way, have you ever seen the documentary about Hitchcock called Dial H for Hitchcock? If not, it is fabulous and worth viewing. It's an obscure thing, so getting access to it might prove difficult.
---
I saw it. I think it came out in 1999, the year of Hitchcock's centennial, and was made for cable.
What I most remember about it is how, at the very end, they used the sweet, sad, building, building BUILDING music of the famous scene in Vertigo where Judy emerges from the bathroom as Madeleine to kiss Scottie. But they didn't show that scene -- they showed newsreel/home movie footage of HITCHCOCK over the years, as Psycho screenwriter Joe Stefano said something rather profound, along the lines of "..I think Hitchcock was brought into the world at exactly the time it needed him, as if we were supposed to have him at that point in history."
ecarle, this conversation has made obvious I need to become better acquainted with the totality of Martin Balsam's work. I've never seen A Thousand Clowns.
What I most remember about it is how, at the very end, they used the sweet, sad, building, building BUILDING music of the famous scene in Vertigo where Judy emerges from the bathroom as Madeleine to kiss Scottie. But they didn't show that scene -- they showed newsreel/home movie footage of HITCHCOCK over the years, as Psycho screenwriter Joe Stefano said something rather profound, along the lines of "..I think Hitchcock was brought into the world at exactly the time it needed him, as if we were supposed to have him at that point in history."
Yes! Those last few minutes with that music combined with those personal home movie clips gave me chills. I was predisposed to them though. The score to Vertigo is one of the most beautiful, haunting things I've ever heard in my life. I have it on CD and play it regularly.
From the documentary, I also love the AFI Lifetime Achievement speech he gave when he honored Alma in that unique, succinct way probably only he could do.
reply share
ecarle, this conversation has made obvious I need to become better acquainted with the totality of Martin Balsam's work. I've never seen A Thousand Clowns.
---
He's good in A Thousand Clowns, mainly for a big pages-long speech he gives at the end -- something actors often get awarded for. But he's not in the movie much otherwise. It may be less screen time than the 20 minutes he gets in Psycho(but WHAT a 20 minutes!)
I wrote a long post about Balsam's career at imdb for the Psycho page that may be here now. I haven't looked. It has too many spoilers for his old movies to read for you, but I certainly found that Balsam worked a LOT in the 60s and 70s. Because he was a character actor and not a leading man, he probably worked in more good-to-great movies than anyone else in Psycho: Breakfast at Tiffanys, Seven Days in May, A Thousand Clowns, Hombre, Catch-22, Little Big Man, All the President's Men. And big hit entertainments like Psycho and The Carpetbaggers. And of course, BEFORE Psycho in 12 Angry Men.
---
What I most remember about it is how, at the very end, they used the sweet, sad, building, building BUILDING music of the famous scene in Vertigo where Judy emerges from the bathroom as Madeleine to kiss Scottie. But they didn't show that scene -- they showed newsreel/home movie footage of HITCHCOCK over the years,
Yes! Those last few minutes with that music combined with those personal home movie clips gave me chills. I was predisposed to them though. The score to Vertigo is one of the most beautiful, haunting things I've ever heard in my life. I have it on CD and play it regularly.
---
The Vertigo score is probably "stand alone," Herrmann's best. A lot of Psycho is designed to work with the images to shock and disturb us. North by Northwest has that rousing overture to start the movie and accompany the Rushmore climax, but its not quite so great as the other two.
Who/what/where...how do I get The Decades Channel!
The Decades Channel is great. I get it over the air with my antenna, so I'm not sure if it's on some cable systems or not like other channels I've seen straddle both worlds. They play many, many great old shows (like Studio One), and every weekend is a Decades Binge with a focus on one show. Guess what next weekend's binge show will be? The Alfred Hitchcock Hour! Here's the link to their website if you're interested in finding out more -- http://www.decades.com/
That is a completely brilliant thing Boston Legal did with the old Shatner clips from Studio One!
reply share
From the documentary, I also love the AFI Lifetime Achievement speech he gave when he honored Alma in that unique, succinct way probably only he could do.
---
He named four people who had helped him with his life -- as a director, as a writer, as the mother of his child and as a great cook -- and all four were Alma.
What a bittersweet affair that AFI show was. You've got Ingrid Bergman hosting and Hitch flanked by white-hairs Cary Grant and James Stewart. You've got Tony Perkins sharing the stage with Janet Leigh. You've got a roundelay of stars from Judith Anderson to Rod Taylor to Vera Miles to Sean Connery. You've got modern-day stars like Barbara Streisand and Walter Matthau in the audience.
And you've got an aged, frail, not-quite-there staring Hitchcock in the center of it all. Sad at the time, but meaningful now.
Hitch was certainly alive enough to look around that room, and to look at his film clips, and to know the impact he had had.
NOTE IN PASSING to PlatinumScreen : I try to respond soon when I can, but I'm not always near the computer to respond. Rest assured I'm often reading posts even when I can't answer and that I WILL answer when I can get to a computer.
A bit of irony on last weekend's Decades schedule. THey had planned on a marathon of AHH, but in tribute to Martin Landau, they ran Mission Impossible instead.
So the guy who got his big break in a major Hitchcock film bumped Hitchcock from the schedule!
movieghoul, I saw that Mission: Impossible played instead, but the irony didn't even occur to me like it did to you! I wonder what Hitchcock would've thought about that!
A bit of irony on last weekend's Decades schedule. THey had planned on a marathon of AHH, but in tribute to Martin Landau, they ran Mission Impossible instead.
So the guy who got his big break in a major Hitchcock film bumped Hitchcock from the schedule!
---
The concept of "a heaven out there someplace" conjures up the funny idea of Hitchcock greeting Marty up there and noting "I see you've knocked my series out for a day down there, Mr. Landau. You're welcome."
I would like to point out parenthetically that the idea that Hitchcock discovered Landau and that NXNW was his "debut" film, keeps coming under attack.
Some have offered Landau's role in "The Gazebo" as first(I don't think so; I think NXNW was summer and The Gazebo was Xmas, 1959.) And now I'm reading that Landau debuted in 1959 in the Korean War film "Pork Chop Hill." (Which, I might add, is a "very early memory" movie in my life, for I remember that my Korean War vet father kept talking about Pork Chop Hill, WHEN IT WAS OUT, this memory is one of my earliest!)
What everyone seems to agree on is that it was "North by Northwest," and not "Pork Chop Hill" or "The Gazebo" where Martin Landau made his first big splash.
My Comcast cable now provides TCM On Demand where for no extra cost you can view a slew of their current month's offerings whenever you want. Including a bunch of the Hitchcocks.
Let me clarify how TCM On Demand currently works. Every day they add some of the films shown on the previous day's schedule and availability for the films chosen lasts a week.
So today (7/28), there are 6 Hitchcock films available, 4 from last week's schedule, Rear Window, Man WHo Knew Too Much, Trouble With Harry and Wrong Man, plus 2 that appeared this Wednesday: Vertigo and The Birds (boohoo, no Psycho!) At no extra charge.
Funny how On Demand compares to intrinsic value. For example, if you want to watch a single episode of the original Twilight Zone (same vintage as these Hitchcock films), you cough up $1.99. While I love TZ, there are no episodes which I would assign higher value to than Vertigo or Rear Window. (Of course, pricing is based on business arrangements which have no relation to the value of the product.)
Let me clarify how TCM On Demand currently works. Every day they add some of the films shown on the previous day's schedule and availability for the films chosen lasts a week.
---
As a longtime TCM subscriber...I never heard of this. I HAVE to check it out. Thanks!
---
Funny how On Demand compares to intrinsic value. For example, if you want to watch a single episode of the original Twilight Zone (same vintage as these Hitchcock films), you cough up $1.99. While I love TZ, there are no episodes which I would assign higher value to than Vertigo or Rear Window. (Of course, pricing is based on business arrangements which have no relation to the value of the product.)
---
Interesting. Indeed, business deals can be different. Also: I think there is a real TZ fanbase of huge intensity out there. 2 bucks for an episode less than a half hour in length? Quality, not quanity!
Also: I think there is a real TZ fanbase of huge intensity out there.
The best TZ eps still play *very* well I think, and remain one of the best introductions to the idea of short stories as surprise/twist engines. I've screened a few eps for various nieces and nephews and they've been very engaged in each case.
reply share
Twilight Zone holds up beautifully. Is it that the prints were better preserved than most for old TV series? One might think the Hitchcock shows would look perfect, and the hour longs are nice to look at, but the half-hours have a drabness to them, as to tone, art direction, lighting. The average Three Stooges short, especially the ones with Shemp, look better than most Hitch half-hours.
I could be that most of the half-hours were done at Republic studios, though their movies often looked good. Cost cutting maybe. The Zone was MGM back lot for all but the first episode, and that may have been a factor. The Outer Limits was also MGM, and they look grand, too. But then Thriller, Uni back lot,--same as Hitchcock's hour--also looks fine and it's at best a cult classic.
I see that it has a huge moviechat following(including you, telegonus) and I'm tempted to join in except I find my memories of the titles is bad.
---
Is it that the prints were better preserved than most for old TV series? One might think the Hitchcock shows would look perfect, and the hour longs are nice to look at, but the half-hours have a drabness to them, as to tone, art direction, lighting. The average Three Stooges short, especially the ones with Shemp, look better than most Hitch half-hours.
---
Ha. Well, the half hours started production in 1955 , and that may be a long time back to preserve TV prints. TZ started in 1959(the year of North by Northwest heading into the year of Psycho) and just feels more modern.
---
I could be that most of the half-hours were done at Republic studios, though their movies often looked good. Cost cutting maybe. The Zone was MGM back lot for all but the first episode, and that may have been a factor. The Outer Limits was also MGM, and they look grand, too. But then Thriller, Uni back lot,--same as Hitchcock's hour--also looks fine and it's at best a cult classic.
---
Hmm..seems to me that production from 1960 must have left the studios with better prints to work from?
---
I have a book of essays on Mad Men, and while they touch on the influence of 1959/1960 Hitchcock and Wilder(The Apartment) on the series, the book's introduction settles on "The Twilight Zone" as the greatest key to why Mad Men works today. The introduction suggests that Rod Serling's vision was way ahead of what else was on TV in the early sixties, and thus can be used by Mad Men to give us a "hipper look" AT the early sixties.
I thought "Vertigo" was kind of overrated...and boring, but I did enjoy "The Birds", "North by Northwest", and "Psycho".
I saw "Psycho" for the first time on the TCM Channel for the first time last month and enjoyed it a great deal. I immediately recognized the late Simon Oakland, who also played Officer Krupke in the film version of "West Side Story", the latter of which is my all time favorite film.
I'd love to see "Psycho" on a great big, wide movie theatre screen, however.