It almost seems as if everything on television these days is required to have a blatant, “in your face” element to it. I’m not sure whether or not it’s genre specific, though.
That's the gist of it. Today, executives ask endlessly for "OMG moments" from their shows -- everything has be an endless orgasm, as it were.
It's not just the older crowd who has a problem with the modern tone. I've heard younger people complain how shows of their generation are too over-the-top and are constantly trying to impress you to the point of exhaustion, and just a good ol' story well told isn't considered enough, ever.
That said, newer shows have, obviously, superior visual effects unimaginable in the past, and a cleverness of dialogue and execution rarely found in days or yore.
The trick, the ideal, would be for producers to be able to do a show with a modern, cynical sensibility and wit and CGI when necessary, but also simple story and human character focus as it used to be.
And how often is that balanced going to be allowed or even asked for?
The reason the
film noir genre from the '40s and early-'50 is one of the only kinds of Old Hollywood pictures that still generates strong interest from more contemporary audiences (although not necessarily from the kids who mostly haven't seen them) is that the
film noir of that era blends the artistry and language of Old Hollywood with a certain realisitc nastiness consistent with the present.
That's a powerful combination. And, in a Tv kind of way, it's probably why TWILIGHT ZONE still works 57 years later.
--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA
reply
share