MovieChat Forums > The Heiress (1949) Discussion > I don't think Austin was a terrible fath...

I don't think Austin was a terrible father.


I noticed a lot of people here find Austin a terrible father and I was wondering why. He surely was really harsh when he told to Catherine she had nothing attractive, only money, but he was emotionally stressed, I guess. He passed all movie trying to open the daughter's eyes and she just keep on being "blind".

I'm sorry, but I think he was better than Lavinia. At least he was sincere. He knew Morris only wanted the money and very likely would hurt Catherine's feelings as the time goes by, why would he allow it?

Lavinia did the opposite. She wanted to see her niece happy, of course, but as I said, very likely Morris would her hurt her if they had married. It was not an intelligent think to do. Actually, it was kinda desperate. Why should Catherine marry Morris if he didn't love her?

Anyway, I love this movie, just really wanted to express my opinion. :)

reply

He was emotionally cruel to Catherine and I despise him for it. That being said though if he truly hated her and had not the smallest piece of love for her why did he not give her up for adoption at birth?

He hated Catherine because most likely her mother died giving birth to her. Her mother was a beauty and it's obvious he loved her very much, some part of him blames Catherine for her death but another knows she is his daughter. He inflicts emotional cruelty on Catherine yet provides her with the best of everything, so in his own way he is being kind to her. He is one of the most fascinating and complex characters ever written in my opinion.

He also acted in her best interests in regards to Morris. He could see Morris was just after her money and wanted to protect her because she was a trusting innocent in the world.

A large part of him is monstrous but he does have a few good qualities. I can actually see him as having been quite a kind and protective father had his relationship with Catherine been better.


Go to bed Frank or this is going to get ugly .

reply

That being said though if he truly hated her and had not the smallest piece of love for her why did he not give her up for adoption at birth?


Name one rich person who ever gave up their child for adoption, especially when the child was not illegitimate? Giving up a child for adoption would be considered a truly horrible thing to do under his circumstances, and he would have paid for that.

reply

I don't think he was a terrible father either. He just had high expectations. If he were a terrible father he would have just let her marry Morris. But he knew that Morris will spend all the money and he couldn't have had Catherine living in debt.
He was realistic about Catherine. I mean, she really was naive, unattractive, with no social skills, no charm. Her only appeal was the money.

reply

The Dr. Sloper haters on here sound like a bunch of kids, who say their Daddy hates them because he tries to make her see what type of person this fortune hunter is. I guess in their eyes, he should have just let her do what she wanted, and married the cad,that's real parental love, when you let the kids do what they want, no matter if it hurts them in the process.

reply

Finally, Dr. Sloper is getting praise here as, not the worst father in the world. He was trying to get his daughter to see what kind of man Townsend was, but, of course her head was in the clouds, and she wasn't going to hear anything bad about him, because he flattered her, and all she wanted to hear was good things about herself, whether it was true or not. She became angry at her father because he finally told her how it was. Also, Dr. Sloper didn't disinherit her, either.

reply

In the book, he DOES disinherit her. They should have kept that in the movie.

reply

Despite the fact that she didn't run off with Townsend? Was there anything else that was different? I think they should have kept that in the movie, too. She ended up hating her father, and every other man as well. I'd say fend for yourself.

reply