Mistakes?


There are a couple of inconsistencies, maybe even mistakes, in the flashback sequences. When Nick Adams describes the meeting of the Swede and Colfax at the gas station he says that he thought that the car was a Cadillac but I am just about positive that the car that appears onscreen is actually a Lincoln. Later, in the scene set in the prison cell, some of Charleston's astronomical information is wrong. He says that the constellation Orion is also called the "Great Bear" but it is in reality called "The Hunter". He gets the location of the star Betelguese right and correctly describes it as a red giant but he incorrectly states that it is the brightest star in the night sky. I was wondering if anyone else had noticed these things or any other possible mistakes.

reply

Those wouldn't be consistency mistakes though, but could be said to be mistakes made by people who thought they knew something and didn't. People are wrong sometimes about what they remember, or what they think they know about astronomy.

reply

i'm really surprised no one noticed the massive reflection of the camera boom and all its operators during the long crane backstory bit (chapter 12, on the criterion version). watch and you'll see the rig and all its operators blatantly flash over the glass of the truck that the men are following behind as they try to make it out of the hat factory. hilarious.

reply

Does any of that really matter? So there are mistakes? A lot of work goes into making a feature film and there are mistakes to be made. I dare you to find a film that has absolutly no scene with a boom mic in the shot or a crew member in the shot. You won't be able to do it. Do these little mishaps make this film any less amazing? I doubt it.

reply

Agreed. Even Kurosawa's 'Seven Samurai' has a crew member or two lurking in the background.

reply

How about when the insurance boss is reading the article about the big robbery and he says that the guard was shot in the groin, but the actor in the flashback is clearly holding his chest.

reply

I don't know about you, but I sure hold my groin close to my heart! ;)

reply

Somebody like you is more apt to hold their groin close to their nose.

Nothing exists more beautifully than nothing.

reply

I think there was another mistake by one of the actresses. When the cop goes to see the housekeeper Swede made his beneficiary, I'm pretty sure the receptionist called her Queenie, when in fact, the character's name was
Mary Ellen Daugherty. Queenie Smith was the actresse's own name.

reply

Yes, but Reardon calls her Queenie, too, and more than once (I saw this film about 30 minutes ago, and I admit I was a little tired). But I thought it odd he would call her by what I assumed was a nickname.

reply

As I recall the headwoman said everyone calls her Queenie.

reply

"Around here, Mr. Reardon, we all call Mary Ellen 'Queenie' [...]"

This is the actual line spoken by Therese Lyon, who played Mrs. Grimes. Thus no mistake or "goof".

Oh, and Reardon was not a cop, he was an investigator for an insurance company.

reply

And that car was a Lincoln, so the first poster was right.

Nothing exists more beautifully than nothing.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

"I think there was another mistake by one of the actresses. When the cop goes to see the housekeeper Swede made his beneficiary, I'm pretty sure the receptionist called her Queenie, when in fact, the character's name was
Mary Ellen Daugherty. Queenie Smith was the actresse's own name."

Did you notice that her accent keeps switching between an Eastern Europian accent and an Irish accent?

reply

[deleted]

Unfortunately the poster is mistaken about the car. It is a Cadillac. It looks to me to be a 1941 60 Special. There used to be one like it running around my neighborhood a few years ago.

:DIXIT INSIPIENS IN CORDE SVO NON EST DEVS: PSALMVS-XIII.I

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

His prounciation of Betelgeuse and other objects was wrong, but understandable in someone who had probably never heard the words pronounced.

reply

I noticed the Astronomy mistakes right away. I think that it had to have been on purpose, a mistake made by the character, not the writers. Even people who know only a few constellations can tell the difference between Orion and Ursa Major (which also contains the stars making up the well-known "big dipper"). Those are probably the two most recognizable constellations in the sky. I find it almost impossible to believe that this would have slipped past everyone involved in the making of the film.

reply

The character who was speaking on astronomy was an uneducated convict in 1940. All he knew is what he taught himself. The character was the one who was mistaken, he did not know all he thought he did. Therefore, it was not a mistake of the movie makers.

And, just a question to the poster who said that the character pronounced Betelgeuse incorectly. Do you think it is actually pronounced like the movie " Beetlejuice"? I hope not.

reply

How about during the caper you have four guys walking out the main gate beside a truck and they run to get in their cars... couldn't they just be happy to be getting off work and in a hurry to go have a beer? There was no indication that an alarm had been sounded and besides, the point was made that all the payroll workers were tied up. The gatekeeper seemed pretty determined to stop them. As soon as he steps into the street he starts shooting at them!

Also, and I don't want to go too far because I realize this was a stylistic touch by the director but the killers are clearly not firing weapons at the Sweede. They are simply moving their right arms in simulation with no discernable recoil (or flinching) as someone flashes a light to represent the muzzelblast. Personally, I think it would have been cool to have them pull out real guns and blast away with real bullets (not shooting Burt of course) but I'm aware that Hollywood shooting is often more accepted by audiences than real shooting. Sometimes you just have to accept that "It's only a movie."

reply

How about during the caper you have four guys walking out the main gate beside a truck and they run to get in their cars... couldn't they just be happy to be getting off work and in a hurry to go have a beer? There was no indication that an alarm had been sounded and besides, the point was made that all the payroll workers were tied up. The gatekeeper seemed pretty determined to stop them. As soon as he steps into the street he starts shooting at them!


The work day had just started. It would be very suspicious that four of them were leaving already.

Where's your crew?
On the 3rd planet.
There IS no 3rd planet!
Don't you think I know that?

reply