I just watched Saboteur and loved it. I feel a little ashamed to say I liked it more than Spellbound (watched them back to back), because Spellbound was an infinitely more ambitious film and had all the elements I love (Ingrid Bergman, psychoanalysis, surrealism, assumed identity). Saboteur is simple, smart, and beautifully shot. I agree with the quick cutting in the handcuff-breaking scene. Masterful
I would go with Saboteur and Young and Innocent as most under-rated. I don't understand how people are claiming that Dial M For Murder is "under-rated." I've seen about 35 of his 50 or so films, and Dial M is near the bottom of my list, with Jamaica Inn and Torn Curtain. So, yes, I'd call Dial M his most over-rated, followed by North By Northwest. Many people only know of NxNW and Psycho as Hitchcock's works, and I don't think it deserves to be his calling card, like Vertigo, Rear Window, The Birds, Psycho, or Marnie.
Yes, I love Marnie. That's my REAL answer for under-rated. Sheer brilliance. I've seen it over 20 times, and I have loved it more and more every time.
Very happy to have seen Saboteur and, thanks to this message board, I'm really excited for my first viewing of Lifeboat and Foreign Correspondent.
Going back to Spellbound for a second, I just spent a month in the Harry Ransom Center researching the Selznick archives, so I know a great deal about his relationship with Hitch. I'm furious that Spellbound didn't turn out as well as it could have--I think it could have been one of his most memorable if he had free rein over the picture--and maybe it's too easy to scapegoat like this, but in my gut I feel like Selznick's touch kind of ruined Spellbound's chances for greatness. I guess I should put this under Spellbound.
reply
share