She was 35 at the time (but looked 45 due to her alchoholic habits) and looked like everyone's maiden aunt. She even had that annoying, yodely vocal style. This was the woman that every man she encountered (well, maybe not Joel "gardenia" Cairo) was willing to sacrifice his life for? In the book, the description was Veronic Lake to a tee. This is perhaps the only weakness in what may be the greatest all-time rookie-director debut. Supposedly, the ship's captain was Walter Huston, director's Dad.
I thought she was quite good in the movie. but do kind of agree that she's not as attractive as she is built-up as throughout the whole movie. she's pretty enough.. just not the stone-cold foxy femme fatale i pictured
I don't know if this has been mentioned before, and I'm not going to read every post to make sure this isn't repetitive, but Mary Astor was like seventh choice for this part. When you get that far down the list, the person you cast is no longer going to be "perfect" for the role.
One thing I think worked in Astor's favor is that she was not decades younger than Bogart. I for one don't think the film would have been as good if Bogart was shown kissing on someone is young enough to be his daughter. Also, I think a young actress would make the character unbelieveable. How is a twenty-something going to go toe-to-toe with Kasper Gutman and his cronies and outsmart them time and again? It doesn't ring quite true to me. It would be like casting Lindsey Lohan as Brigid and then Anthony Hopkins as Gutman. How is that going to work?
Astor did the best she could with the talent and the limited lines she had. Her performance wasn't stellar, but it did not negatively impact the film much, either.
"It's not that you had it bad, but that you're that pissed that so many others had it good."
The only worse hairdo in the history of cinema I know of was Elsa Lanchester's in Bride of Frankenstein. Fix that, no problem. She was pretty enough and I can't see any problem with her performance.
As to the book, it's a weird experience reading it if you've already seen the film. I felt I knew every line as it came up.
Supposedly, Geraldine Fitzgerald was the studio's first choice. While not always right, in this case, I have to agree that Fitzgerald probably would have been 'perfect' as Brigid O'Shaughnessy. It's too bad she refused a role which likely would have made her a star.
Evidently, other choices were Rita Hayworth, Olivia de Haviland, and Ingrid Bergman. None of those seem like they would have worked out too well. My personal choice would have been Claire Trevor, who essentially did the same character six years later in Born to Kill.
In any event, as others have pointed out, simply having a better haircut would have improved Astor in the part exponentially.
Oh I thought she was a terrible pick as Brigid O'Shaughnessy.
I read the book first and honestly, while reading, I thought Humphrey Bogart was born to play Sam Spade (granted I knew ahead of time).
But while reading I thought it'd be a woman with a quick tongue and, yes, she had to be very physically attractive based on my interpretation of the book.
If only Audrey Hepburn been 10 years younger and started acting 10 years earlier.
Anyway, my initial hope before knowing it was Mary Astor was Teresa Wright. As well as she played the sweet, innocent woman, I thought she could speak as quickly and shoot the devious looks I was expecting from Brigid O'Shaughnessy.
Teresa Wright = Brigid O'Shaughnessy??? I say yes. Would've taken a great performance, though, I admit that (but she would've delivered).
Mary Astor was perfect in this role; it looks like the same "who can we get for the remake?" people are out in force on this thread. Which is always depressing, because it's mronnic.
I saw this movie on tv when I was a kid and even then I just could not buy Mary Astor in this part. Something just told me that she was not a woman men would risk their lives for, as previous posts have stated.
Having just read the book and watched the movie (I can't compare it with the 1931 version as I have not seen that yet), I'll add in my two cents. I was not sold on Mary Astor. She was simply too old for this particular role. I think one of the reasons Brigid was able to get away with as much as she did was because of her youth. The men fall for her because they don't expect someone so innocent and youthful on the surface to be so malicious. Spade's secretary is taken in by her act, becoming maternal towards her.
As others have commented, in this film Astor is playing a "bad liar". But in the novel I got the impression she was actually an effective liar. In the film there was no question that Bogart did not trust Astor. In the novel, one of the things that kept me on the edge of my seat was not knowing what part of Brigid's act was lies and which parts (if any at all) Spade believed. No one was trustworthy in the book, including Spade. In the film, you could count on Bogart to decipher the dynamics between the four villains perfectly and always be ready with a plan up his sleeve.
Having said that, though, I cannot offer any better actress suggestions. If they were going to remake the Maltese Falcon today, I'd be hard-pressed to name anyone who would be right for the role.
Going back to Astor's performance, though, I am in the middle of reading Red Harvest and I definitely think Astor would have been appropriate for Dinah Brand if they had made a movie of that novel during that era. We'll see how the novel and the character ultimately pan out.
I'm surprised to read so many posters calling Astor unattractive. Admittedly she dresses like a frump here but c'mon guys look at that face. Are the other fellas on here honestly going to tell me they have never seen a prim proper looking woman and didn't fantasize about how wild she might be in the correct circumstances.
I think she's great as manipulative and backstabbing. She could have used a more flattering hairstyle, one that accentuated her eyes and lips and not the squareness of her face, and also more form fitting outfits just to make the sex appeal believable, because I get the feeling she's got a good bod under those badly cut dresses. They couldn't be too sexy, because she's trying to present herself as a good girl, but they could be a little more provocative. I've encountered a lot of women who were able to manipulate men but who weren't conventionally drop dead gorgeous, they were just talented.
One of my favourite movies, I can watch it again and again. I love the mood, it takes place in some 3 AM dimension.
Yeah I wasnt particularly fond of her casting in this movie. I wish Ida Lupino did this role. She was around at the time and would have been a nice choice. I think she could have pulled off the slightly calmer but emotional Shaughnesy.
Well I see nuts brought this thread back, which despite being a huge fan of this film I was not aware of, and so here I am responding to Honey's three year old post. heh.
First of all I think Ida Lupino was great. I want to see more of her films, but her acting in High Sierra stands out in what is not my favorite Bogart film by any means. What makes her worth considering for Falcon was her marvelous ability to make what started out as a rather unsympathetic character in Sierra into one hte viewer cares very much about. She is also that kind of woman whose beauty is greatly enhanced by her manner and the way she holds herself.
but there's a big problem with casting her in Falcon. She was born in 1918, and thus would have been far too young for hte part. As noted above many times the part called for someone who not only could hold her own and very much so against the various sordid characters in it. She also would have had to have what was euphemistically called "experience", meaning someone who had gotten to that stage of life still living life on the run, with intermittent relations with men, very much of a manipulative sort. Someone who in effect had been doing it long enough that she was not going to change, and really had no realistic options.
Brigid's near manic joining in the falcon's pursuit would have been less credible if played by a woman the age of Ida Lupino.
As for Mary Astor's portrayal, I very much agree with those here who point out that the critics have completely missed the point about her character. Brigid is not supposed to be overall sympathetic(although the degree to which she borders on the pathetic does in a backhand sort of way give reason to have some sympathy). It is hard for me to remember the first time I saw the film, but I do recall not knowing at first taht she was a phony. At first. But you can't help miss that her histrionics were false when the script finally makes clear she was not there at all for the reasons she offered in the beginning.
As for her beauty, or some would say lack thereof, that is also unfair. Comparisons to The Big Sleep are perhaps inevitable, but totally off the point. TBS is intended to be a complete fantasy. Even the cab drivers are not only female but hot. All of them were. By that time Bogart and Bacall were well known as the Hollywood couple, and that went along with Bogart's emergence as a sex symbol. Falcon preceded Casablanca, and Bogart was just beginning to get lead roles, and was not yet widely accepted as the romantic leading man. (There were hints he could so in for example his great chemistry interaction but in a small part work with Claire Trevor in Dead End, but Sierra was his first leading part in anything approaching a romantic story.)
In actuality Mary Astor was six years younger than Bogart. Forget about his later career. At the time she was a very plausible potential love interest for him and his character.
Given the difficulties of the role, not only do I think Mary Astor was an excellent choice for it, but I think her portrayal was a great one. As one of my favorite films Falcon has several great performances. But she holds her own and then some, and arguably has hte most difficult role in the film. In short I disagree with her critics, and think her work here was outstanding.
Given the difficulties of the role, not only do I think Mary Astor was an excellent choice for it, but I think her portrayal was a great one. As one of my favorite films Falcon has several great performances. But she holds her own and then some, and arguably has hte most difficult role in the film. In short I disagree with her critics, and think her work here was outstanding.
It was hard for me to like her in the role of Brigid O'Shaughnessy but anyone who has read the book will know it is exactly to the way Dashiell Hammett wrote it. I suppose the reason I didn't like was because I didn't like the character. I don't suppose many people did but that didn't actually have anything to do with Mary Astor's acting but because of the way the author drew her. Challenging, difficult...lots of things. But the more I think about her, the fewer actresses of the period I can see playing the role. Someone mentioned Veronica Lake earlier. I suppose it's a reasonable suggestion but after thinking about it I can't really imagine her in the role.
reply share