Why Was He Fangless?
Why did they depict Dracula fangless in this movie?
The Webmaster
www.trueghoststories.co.uk
Whoever said he was supposed to have fangs?
Ignore Republicans; then you rob them of their lies having any influence. http://foxnewslies.net/
doesn't the BOOK Say so?
that means that according to you and this movie Twilight is the closest to Lugosi's dracula than any other movie then
One ring to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.
As a matter of face, no, the book doesn't - might try reading it.
Nons have ISSUES - the WM3 are INNOCENT.
I can't read
shareThe book says Dracula has peculiarly sharp teeth and specifically mentions that he has "long, sharp canine teeth". When Jonathan first encounters the Brides of Dracula and one of them goes to 'kiss' him, he feels two sharp teeth on his neck before Dracula stops her. Later, when Lucy and Mina are attacked by Dracula, one of the things their friends notice is that their teeth look longer and sharper than before. But the word fang is never used to describe these sharp teeth.
shareBram Stoker.
What's the ugliest part of your body?