[deleted]
[deleted]
THE HYPERBOLE IS STRONG IN THIS ONE.
share
MovieChat Forums > Daisy Ridley Discussion > [deleted]
Poofter eh ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WjZBkQMAMw
From what I recall that wasn't the case with Hamill or Christensen. You have to remember this is time where the liberal film makers want to try and convince men that ugly women are hot, not attractive women... where fat women are in, no thin or normal women... It's all a big scam which is either being perpetrated by ugly or fat women in Hollywood, the parents of ugly or fat girls in Hollywood, or possibly by men trying to convince all other men to chase the ugly and fat women so that they can have less competition for the actual hot women.
But Ridley is a prime example of an ugly actress with no redeeming qualities.. Hell she can't even act, at least in the old days when you had some ugly woman like Meryl Streep she could at least act.
But Ridley is a prime example of an ugly actress with no redeeming qualities.. Hell she can't even act,
I will never understand what people like you get out of saying things that are obviously and blatantly untrue. Do you think it's clever, or are you paid to do it ? Daisy Ridley is not only a beautiful woman she is a trained and accomplished actress, singer and dancer. And she is the single biggest reason why the sequels were so successful.
And you would be who, Ridley's mama because she has a face that only her mother could find beautiful.
shareThe hate is strong with this one.
shareAgreed
shareI agree about how they're pushing fat acceptance, etc but there were plenty of less attractive actresses than her in other eras. Esp the 80s.
shareWhat actresses from the 80's were less attractive than she was? I can think of only Meryl Streep and Segourney Weaver being in her level of ugly, but that could actually act. Was there another actress from the 80's I'm missing? Even if I'm thinking of ones that had an odd face like Jennifer Tilly they at least had some major league titties to distract your gaze from the face to the tits.
shareLike i've said before, she seems like Keira Knightley's less attractive and less charismatic little sister. Kennedy & the Di$ney Wars team didn't do her any favors by desexualizing her to the point of making her an asexual plank of wood, undercutting whatever feminine aesthetic appeal she could have had. She's actually somewhat more attractive outside of the films when she's doing interviews or attending public events where she's allowed to carry herself as a woman.
shareI've noticed the Knightley resemblance too.
Other than that I have no strong feelings about her either way. She's pretty and was fine in the Star Wars movies. You never really know how good an actor is though until they break free from that franchise.
She looks like a horse
This is how the female lead should have lookrd
https://cdnb.artstation.com/p/assets/images/images/022/800/891/small/arion-art-arion-rey-02-publish.jpg?1576729213
She doesn't look like a horse at all. What a mean thing to say.
shareI'll agree with the looks like a horse, but disagree with the photo of what she should have looked like.... Would have been more believable to have had smaller tits than your photo, not void of tits like Daisy, but with some reasonable tits on an athletic type body... but for the love of god an at least above average face. The horse mouth and cat eyes just make her look like a fucking alien.
shareIf not kat dennings vWe needed a Kelly Brook type not horsegirl
share[deleted]
I m serious horsegirl is fugly
shareI remember before The Force Awakens came out and no one really had seen her before, lots of weird fans kept on saying “I’d pee in her butt”
share[deleted]
She is awesome material to get rid of an erection. What's the opposite of viagra? Not only her looks, but her phony "acting" are quite the strong turnoff.
But it's unfair to look in the past. What about adam Driver? He's even more awful!