Will Kamala Harris Win In 4 Years ?
Surely she must be a favorite!
shareYes please run her again I am begging you
share
MovieChat Forums > Kamala Harris Discussion > Will Kamala Harris Win In 4 Years ?
Not unless she does a believable and honest 180 on her war mongering.
But that's valid also if you ask the same question about whoever else Democrats could nominate, if they nominate another war monger they'll lose again for the very same reason they lost this time.
Most democrats wants WAR!
shareCorrect, because Democrats are right wing authoritarians.
But Democratic voters do not want to vote for right wing war mongers, which was the reason why Harris lost, Democratic voters found "the lesser evil" still too bad to vote for, they stayed home and didn't vote, or in other words, not Republicans won the elections, Democrats lost their voters.
This will be the very same thing for whichever other war mongering candidate Democrats might nominate next time.
THIS
shareYea, because open borders and inflation weren't a factor either, right?
shareThey were a big talking point in the propaganda, but they were not the reason why Democratic voters stayed home and didn't vote.
For Republican voters they were reasons to go and vote, but that wouldn't have been enough to win the election if it hadn't been for Democratic voters staying home.
There has been a survey recently among Democratic voters who stayed home, asking for the reasons why they didn't vote and the by far leading reason was that Harris kept saying she'd keep the US support for Israel and Ukraine going.
Got ya. Did not having a primary and just appointing Kamala as the nominee hurt the democrat party? Ironically they were the ones complaining about the threat of democracy, yet they just appointed a candidate for their voters to vote for and ignored the fact that Biden won the primary to run for reelection
shareDemocrats are quite desperate these days.
On the one hand they are corporate sellouts, throwing ever more money at the rich just like Republicans do and on the other hand they want to pretend to be "the lesser evil" for average people, while an ever larger amount of average people figures out, they are both same evil.
Democrats are trying the impossible, searching for a candidate that average people will vote for, who after winning an election would keep the corruption going.
They've done this just too often, Democratic voters want to see actions in terms of taxing the rich and increasing social services for the middle class, instead of empty words and war mongering.
What survey is this? I don't think I've seen Israel support even being remotely close to the top reason democrats stayed home.
shareSorry but Democrats lost their voters because of:
1. their encouragement of gender mental illness
2. Policies that were directly responsible for record inflation
3. Support of groomers, child trafficking, and people who molest children
The Democrat party, their media rectum, and their cult voters, supported the wars including the unwinnable war in Ukraine. They blocked the peace of deal from May 2022, and caused the deaths of 250,000 Russians and Ukrainians. Never once did anyone on their side call for diplomacy.
Fun fact, communist left wing war monger authoritarians caused the deaths of 100 million people in the 20th century.
Democrats are who they are. Racist KKK founding communists who love war and enslaving everyone who isn’t white.
Any questions?
Yea, one question left.
Why do I write this before I put you on ignore?
I think she runs but she won't be any stronger of a candidate, so I think the Dems can find someone better.
shareThe answer should overwhelmingly be no. If you blow through a billion dollar campaign fund only to lose and be 20 million in debt you aren't a leader and have no business being President.
shareIf she runs in an open primary, it will be a replay of 2016, when she had to drop out because she wasn't getting support from any delegates. She's a terrible candidate, and always was. She was picked for VP because Biden promised James Clyburn to pick a "woman of color" in return for the support of the Congressional Black Caucus. Her performance in office totally vindicated the alternate translation of DEI: Didn't Earn It. She became a textbook example of why picking people because they check diversity boxes is always a bad idea. Selection should only ever be based on merit. Anything else -- political backscratching, cronyism, nepotism, and yes, DEI -- means you end up with without the best people in key, perhaps even critical jobs.
Kamala Harris is unintelligent, inarticulate, and unlikable. She'll never get the nomination if she has to face real competition for it.
I hope she runs again, and babbles/cackles us into another four to eight years of Republican presidency.
share