This guy's debate analysis nails it...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffifCtXGQ2A
shareIt's surreal to think that in a presidential debate, a candidate would feel the need to bring up the topic of people eating pets as a serious issue. If this is considered one of the key topics for a campaign, it speaks volumes. Meanwhile, he denies any involvement in the January 6th insurrection.
ABC only stepped in because Trump tends to lie the moment he starts speaking, and it’s baffling that some people can’t recognize those obvious falsehoods.
Also, it's ironic that he criticizes her for wearing luxury goods, suggesting that this disqualifies her from being a middle-class person. Politicians, including senators, earn well—it's no secret. Even Bernie Sanders, who is often labeled a socialist, is a millionaire, and he wasn't struggling financially before he became widely known. Just because she’s wealthy now doesn’t erase her past experiences as a member of the middle class.
You better vote for Kamala then. 🤡
share