MovieChat Forums > Kamala Harris Discussion > Kamala will destroy Trump

Kamala will destroy Trump


There is no chance anybody sane would vote for an 80 y.o. convicted felon, lying, cheating, ignorant grifter over a honest, young, upright, goodwilling person with a positive attitude and good ideas.

She just needs a good VP pick, and she will win in a landslide, and be a great President too.

Americans are fed up with the likes of Biden and Trump and need to turn page. Harris is the answer.

reply

The King is dead, long live the Queen!

reply

[deleted]

i have no idea, but fun to watch

reply

Yep.

reply

She'll cackle her way through any crisis that presents itself. 🙄 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs4IiYMnafA

reply

What has she accomplished as VP?

reply

She got Biden elected for a start.

reply

What will it mean to you, if the dems decide she is unelectable and pass her over?

reply

Nothing much, but you'd better get used to the idea of President Harris for the next four years.

reply

So, you would accept that? Interesting. I knew that you would, but I thought you would at least pretend to have trouble with it.

SO, you admit that she was only hired as a token?

reply

Bu...but she got Biden elected! Not that there's any proof of that.

She was given the task of being "Border Czar." Looks like she didn't do a thing, there. I don't know of a single thing she was given to do at which she succeeded or excelled. I mean, other than being a biracial person of color to be yet another DEI hire of the Biden Administration.

The only creature more pathetic has been the "First Gentleman."

I heard today that she'd never won a single Primary. She's accomplished nothing, had to drop out of the race first, but did get a few pointed questions at Kavanaugh when she was a Senator. Sadly, other than those few questions, she accomplished nothing as a Senator. And she has all the failure of the Biden Administration clinging to her.

reply

[–] Destinata (2914) a day ago
Bu...but she got Biden elected! Not that there's any proof of that.

She was given the task of being "Border Czar." Looks like she didn't do a thing, there. I don't know of a single thing she was given to do at which she succeeded or excelled. I mean, other than being a biracial person of color to be yet another DEI hire of the Biden Administration.

The only creature more pathetic has been the "First Gentleman."

I heard today that she'd never won a single Primary. She's accomplished nothing, had to drop out of the race first, but did get a few pointed questions at Kavanaugh when she was a Senator. Sadly, other than those few questions, she accomplished nothing as a Senator. And she has all the failure of the Biden Administration clinging to her."

Trump needs to use this against her 100% because everything you just said is in fact true and the only reason she's being touted as the next President is not because of any accomplishments, but because of Race, Gender, Oprah Obama & Soros

reply

It's a tactic to be discreet. If she is president she will be shielded more. Like with all presidents.

reply

Nothing says that you have been totally brainwashed by Trump's rhetoric than calling her "Border Czar" 🙄

It was Trump himself who undermined an agreement that would help stabilize the border because he did not want to give the Biden administration a win.

There has been a 72% drop in immigration from just Central America between March 2021, when Harris took on the role, and June 2024.

reply

Not only she will do a great job on immigration.
It's an issue that Trump has already fucked up once as President, so HE is the one who can be attacked on it.

reply

WTF?

The MSM labeled her "Border Czar", not Trump. The same media that praised her as amazing right up until Trump mopped the floor with her.

How on earth is referring to her as border czar a sign of being brainwashed by Trump?

You saying that proves that you have been completely brainwashed by the MSM.

You should not be able to vote.

YOU are what is wrong with this country.

reply

Educate yourself:
https://thehill.com/homenews/nexstar_media_wire/4910824-vance-called-harris-a-border-czar-during-the-vp-debate-what-does-that-mean/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/09/27/what-to-know-about-kamala-harriss-immigration-record-before-border-visit-today/

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-calls-kamala-harris-border-czar-fact-check-immigration-2024-rcna163422

I'm embarrassed for you.

reply

You present more BS MSM articles to prove you aren't brainwashed by MSM BS.

Brilliant!

https://youtu.be/neOQ7FZrdyU

You can see it with your own eyes and hear it with your own ears. The MSM referred to her as the border czar and then later denied it.

Get a grip on reality, kid.

reply

Do you know what a 'Border Czar' is?

Facts don't care about your feelings. Biden tasked Harris with addressing the root causes influencing people’s decisions to migrate to the United States.

The Republican National Committee said Biden appointed Harris “to be his border czar to deal with stopping illegal immigration.”

Biden did not task her with controlling who and how many people enter the southern U.S. border. That’s the Homeland Security secretary’s responsibility.

reply

Brainwash yourself with the same propaganda I did


FTFY

reply

I would accept anything decided democratically.

That's the difference between democracy and your pathetic personal cult of that buffoon: in a democracy, nobody is irreplaceable. In a cult, just remove the leader, and everyone is lost.

reply

If the party decides to pass over Harris, it will not be done democratically, so what is your real reason for accepting it?


Dude. It is kind of funny for you to try to run that line of jive about "cult" after the last year when the dems maintained a completely FALSE party line that Biden was just fine, until he proved on national tv that he wasn't.

Trump is the man of the hour because of the way YOU dems made him that, becauase of your hysterical ANTI-DEMOCRATIC efforts to destory him from the steele dossier to the insane attempts to arrest him for bullshit, to the constant panic mongering and race baiting.

We HAVE to vote for Trump at this point, not because of TRUMP, but because NOT doing that would be a validation for your side's Banana Republican tactics.


reply

You speak of "Democracy" yet, you have a Democrat Party that just took Biden out at the knees because they didn't get their way with the results of the debate: The debate THEY wanted to begin with and that's not Democracy if you're saying "Fuck the people that voted for Biden in the Primary and he won"

reply

Nobody took anybody out, quit lying.
Biden was informed of the situation he was facing at the polls after that debate.

He finally decided to opt out of the ticket, which is a wise and generous decision.

That is Democracy at its finest. Let me repeat it for you cultist: no man is irreplaceable. It's a government of the PEOPLE, not of one guy.

reply

They made Biden offer he couldn't refuse and in the process, put the gun or $$$$$ down on the table in front of him and made him an offer: Take the $$$$$ or end up disappearing if you don't get out of the Race

reply

Sure, keep writing your lies and fantasies.
Nobody has done such a thing.
Biden was informed of the situation he was facing at the polls after that debate.

He finally decided to opt out of the ticket, which is a wise and generous decision.

That is Democracy at its finest. Let me repeat it for you cultist: no man is irreplaceable. It's a government of the PEOPLE, not of one guy.

reply

It's not Democracy after people voted for this man after he won a Primary for Christ sake, so don't they have a say in this??

reply

No they don't, when THE MAN HIMSELF says he is not running anymore.

reply

Then for the last year or more, this Marxist Democrap Party has fed the American people noth8ing but shit and lies about Biden's health and how he does circles around people at meetings and it was all a LIE because they are so obsessed like YOU with Donald Trump that they were wiling to sweep this right under the rug while thinking the American people were stupid..

reply

Where is the logic in YOUR huge pile of horseshit?
Pete Sampras won his 16th slam and retired right after that.
Was he lying before he retired? Did he retire thinking he was young enough to play 1, 2 or 4 more years? Or even more importantly: does he owe YOU an explanation of the reasons why, or the moment when, he decided the most difficult choice in his career???
Apply here.

reply

Hold it a second Gen Z: Are you denying the Left and the Democrap Party haven't been lying to the American Public about Biden's health for 3.5 Years with bullshit like "Joe's running circles around us at the Meetings with all of his Energy" crap?? Think about this before you post??

reply

No, I said nothing about YOUR horseshit.
Are you so stupid that I have to translate what I wrote?

reply

Yes, Yes you did you fucking hypocrite and the rest of the site see's this too??

reply

"He finally decided to opt out of the ticket..."

Hell, do you really BELIEVE that??? Some brains seem to shrink a little more each time you wash them... 🤔

reply

Again, you keep bringing up "Democracy" when the Party you side with in the Democrats basically forced Biden out, so how once again is that Democracy??

reply

Heisenberg (6730) 4 months ago

"I would accept anything decided democratically."

Really?

So, if the majority voted to reinstate slavery you would accept it?
How about if they voted that people with your name will lose their rights and be sent to prison immediately?
Will you accept that?

People who claim to love and support democracy NEVER do, IME.

Every single time they hear something they do not like they would not accept it.
Good thing we live in a constitutional republic where the moronic masses cannot pass unconstitutional laws. If we didn't, you and your ilk would vote your own rights and property away.

reply

She didn't get Biden elected. Biden was installed. The 2020 election went against all other applicable elections in United States history.

reply

Do you have proof that the 2020 election was stolen because no one else does?

reply

First that is a lie. Second, the burden lies in proving the election that went against election history was legitimate.






reply

Do you have proof that the 2020 election was stolen because no one else does?

reply

I bet I can show more convincing evidence that the 2020 election was stolen vs your evidence that it was legitimate.

reply

Whatever... You are very stupid. If you have convincing evidence that the 2020 election was stolen then you would be screaming about it from the rooftops. You have nothing. You are just another dumbass who worships Trump and your time in the Sun is over. Harris will destroy Trump in November then you can slink back to your trailer park and drink Bud Light while you scream at your TV.

reply

Good, get emotional and resort to personal attacks because you're unable to discuss the legitimacy of the 2020 election.

reply

The evidence that it was legitimate is the fact that Biden is POTUS and has been for over three years...

reply

You could apply that same failed logic to proven crooked elections.

reply

https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/word-salad#:~:text=Word%20salad%20is%20defined%20as,make%20a%20lot%20of%20sense.

reply

If you think my reply was “a jumble of extremely incoherent speech" then seek help.

reply

[–] Branson26 (538) 4 days ago
First that is a lie. Second, the burden lies in proving the election that went against election history was legitimate.
That is hilarious and simply has no precedent in Juris Prudence.

An election is INNOCENT until proven GUILTY. Go ahead, make your case that the election was fraudulent and or illegitimate and or illegal and or "Suspect".

You're going to need facts and not opinions or even Amicus briefs.

The internet(s) will wait. 🗽

reply

The burden lies in proving the election that went against election history was legitimate. It's far more likely that the candidate that the elites were afraid would lose due to manipulated results as opposed to an election that suddenly flips 200+ years of history.

In any case, the 2020 election doesn't even hold up when compared with similar popular vote differentials. Obama had a 3.9% advantage in 2012 which gave him 332 electoral votes. Biden had 4.5% advantage but only 306 electoral votes. Biden popular vote numbers were grossly inflated to push the steal.

reply

The burden lies in proving the electi- WHO THE FUCK CARES IT WAS FOUR FUCKING YEARS AGO JUST GET OVER IT AND SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU ABSOLUTE TWATWAFFLEWHO THE FUCK CARES IT WAS FOUR FUCKING YEARS AGO JUST GET OVER IT AND SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU ABSOLUTE TWATWAFFLEWHO THE FUCK CARES IT WAS FOUR FUCKING YEARS AGO JUST GET OVER IT AND SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU ABSOLUTE TWATWAFFLEWHO THE FUCK CARES IT WAS FOUR FUCKING YEARS AGO JUST GET OVER IT AND SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU ABSOLUTE TWATWAFFLEWHO THE FUCK CARES IT WAS FOUR FUCKING YEARS AGO JUST GET OVER IT AND SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU ABSOLUTE TWATWAFFLEWHO THE FUCK CARES IT WAS FOUR FUCKING YEARS AGO JUST GET OVER IT AND SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU ABSOLUTE TWATWAFFLEWHO THE FUCK CARES IT WAS FOUR FUCKING YEARS AGO JUST GET OVER IT AND SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU ABSOLUTE TWATWAFFLEWHO THE FUCK CARES IT WAS FOUR FUCKING YEARS AGO JUST GET OVER IT AND SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU ABSOLUTE TWATWAFFLE-on that went against election history was legitimate. It's far more likely that the candidate that the elites were afraid would lose due to manipulated results as opposed to an election that suddenly flips 200+ years of history.

reply

Imagine getting upset over facts.

reply

You only have your fantasies--no facts at all.

reply

Good, then attack what I said. I'll wait.

reply

Actually, I'm interested in attacking the source of what you said. I'll wait.




M'lady *tips hat*

reply

What I said? You're going to have to be specific.

reply


[–] Branson26 (553) 19 hours ago
Good, then attack what I said. I'll wait.

reply share ignore report
[–] SamNoyoun (4769) 17 hours ago
Actually, I'm interested in attacking the source of what you said. I'll wait.




M'lady *tips hat*

reply edit delete share
[–] Branson26 (553) 2 hours ago
What I said? You're going to have to be specific.


obviously
what I said

is what I was referring to...Are you being deliberately obtuse or are you just dense?


Anyway, it matters not because all your sources are gospel truth and all my sources are fake news...

reply

Still not specific. I said several things.

reply

She sucked a lot of dick probably.

reply

Then you have that in common with her.

reply

lol, that's some embarrassing projection from yourself there.

reply

Democrats don’t even believe this. Which is why they are trying to bypass her if Biden drops off. She polls worse than he does. No one really like her. The only people that would be excited to vote for her, are people that vote based on identity politics.

reply

Nope, she is gonna be declared their nominee as soon as Biden fucks off.

The discussion is just HOW to present the change, and who will be a winning VP.

reply

HOW to present the change



The obvious answer is for Joe to resign, then President Harris will become the presumptive nominee...

reply

Holy crap this hasn't aged well! It hasn't even been a week and you folks are cowering in your boots over the prospect of running against Kamala...

reply

Yes it has. Democrats would replace her in a second if someone else would step up, but no one want to give up their seat to run a last minute campaign. She is still unpopular, and Republicans are more excited about her running than democrats are.

The only thing that has changed is that liberals are gaslighting you into believing she’s popular.

reply

Keep praying buddy.

reply



Fuck off Heisenberg you pathetic TROLL.


reply

Heisenberg.


[none]

reply