MovieChat Forums > Elon Musk Discussion > Elon Musk wants to change Wikipedia to "...

Elon Musk wants to change Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" ☺


For some reasons I'm currently not very fond of Elon Musk.
https://filmboards.com/board/t/Elon-Musk-must-change-his-Plans-in-Germany-3464762/

But he has much humour!


Elon Musk willing to offer $1 Billion to Wikipedia if it changes Name
Billionaire Elon Musk has been in the news ever since his takeover of Twitter, which was later changed to X. The Founder of SpaceX and Tesla posts on the microblogging platform regularly, often intriguing users across the globe. Recently, the billionaire said that he would pay Wikipedia $1 billion if they changed their name. "I will give them a billion dollars if they change their name to Dickipedia," he said, adding that he would do so "in the interests of accuracy."

When a user urged Wikipedia to go ahead with the name change, Mr. Musk set another condition. "@Wikipedia, Do it! You can always change it back after you collect," the user said. To which, the billionaire replied, "One year minimum. I mean, I'm not a fool lol."

https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/elon-musk-willing-to-offer-1-billion-to-wikipedia-if-it-changes-name-to-4505917 October 24, 2023


Now that's true!
Mr. Musk is certainly not a fool. πŸ˜Šβ€‹

reply

Perhaps I'm not the first with that idea, but there's a much better solution.
Mr. Musk could pay every Wikipedia-/Wikimedia-user an abo for a good Encyclopedia.
And with that abo they get blocked for all Wikipedia sites for one year.

I nominate the Brockhaus Encyclopedia.
It was a really great Encyclopedia that was even used by university students for copying.
Some of them were later exposed as plagiarists, when the Internet era started. ☺
Founded in Germany the publisher sold the rights in time before they went bankrupt.
Now the owner is Swedish.
So please, don't suspect national nepotism here, I'm not a Swede.

Let's do the maths:
In August 2023 were 119,420,000 "unique users" of Wikimedia Foundation Sites.
https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/3337/umfrage/die-populaersten-internetseiten-weltweit/
A monthly Brockhaus Abo is EUR 6.00 (basis, about the same in dollars).
https://brockhaus.de/info/privat/

119,420,000 x EUR 6 = EUR 716,520,000 monthly x 12 = EUR 8,598,240,000 yearly

Ouch, that's too much.
We need to negotiate a good volume discount with Sweden. πŸ€“β€‹

reply

No Wonder Elon Musk Is Now Attacking Wikipedia:
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-10-24/no-wonder-elon-musk-wants-to-see-wikipedia-taken-down

The world's richest person and owner of X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter, seems to have been rattled by a report published by Newsguard, a company that rates the trustworthiness of information sources.

Late last week it offered some troubling statistics around misinformation on X pertaining to the Israel-Hamas conflict almost a year after Musk bought the website for $44 billion. Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales is an advisor to Newsguard.

Of course, in Musk's world, no media source can be considered trustworthy, particularly those that criticize him. Indeed, he claims his own Wikipedia entry is false, despite being heavily moderated and containing verified facts. One of his followers on X suggested someone had been paid to write a negative Musk entry on "Wokipedia." Musk agreed, naturally.

Building Wikipedia could have made Wales one of the richest people on the planet, but he instead has a reported net worth in the low millions of dollars. Long a prominent activist for an open internet, Wales has previously called for "very strong implementation of a right to free speech in Europe β€” essentially the language of the First Amendment in the US." Indeed, unlike Musk, who readily admits he will take down content in countries that demand it, Wales has consistently shown his mettle and stood up to Chinese efforts at censorship.


https://www.resetera.com/threads/elon-musk-tw%F0%9D%95%8Ftt%F0%9D%95%8Fr-dr%F0%9D%95%8Fm%F0%9D%95%8F-%F0%9D%95%8Ft-let%E2%80%99s-keep-it-here-parody-%F0%9F%94%B5-official-%EA%95%A4.649272/post-114117233

reply

Interesting...but I didn't really wonder.
Though using Wikipedia myself, some of its articles (especially about politicians, actors and other VIPs) are very biased.

What do you think about the Encyclopedia abo for everyone?
Do you think we can get a good volume discount from Sweden? πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ​

reply

Wikipedia is controlled by a corporation, instead of a non-profit organisation, so spin whatever way you want, that is a fact.

reply

Some leftist "company that rates trustworthiness"? BFD. Definitely not to be trusted.

reply

Yah, now let's see what Wikipedia aka Dickipedia says about NewsGuard.

Sites that had previously ignored the extension, such as MailOnline, objected to being listed as unreliable. The decision to list MailOnline as unreliable was reversed, and NewsGuard admitted they were wrong on some counts.

NewsGuard has been criticized by Breitbart News as "the establishment media's latest effort to blacklist alternative media sites".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NewsGuard#Ratings_and_reception


β€‹πŸ€”β€‹

reply