Will be either the 48th or 49th president.
He's the Democrats' best hope at this point.
shareNo chance. They won’t put another California candidate at the top of the ticket for a long time, not to mention the ex-mayor of a progressive shithole like San Francisco. It’ll have to be either Shapiro or someone from the Midwest who claims to understand working people.
shareAfter 4 years of Trump a progressive like Newsom will look good. Too early to count him out.
share"After 4 years of Trump a progressive like Newsom will look good."
To who? People who live in NY City and the California coast?
48 percent, half the country voted for that dimwit Harris
Please, Newsom would have done much better.
80% of the counties voted for Trump.
shareSo, the popular vote was razor thin, 50% to 48%. Harris was a weak appointed candidate. She is probably the only major Democratic contender who is weaker than Trump. Trump has massive negatives, several felonies, and evidence of sexual harassment. Any Democrat besides doddering old Biden and flipflopping far left Harris could have beaten him. The Democrats screwed this one up bigtime.
shareaccording to the real results and not some made up requirement like the popular vote.
Trump won 32 states and got 312 electoral college votes.
according to this map, Trump won over 80% of the counties in america.
https://mapsontheweb.zoom-maps.com/post/766433390969946112/county-level-election-results-of-the-2024-us
senate
Republican Party
53 seats
house
Republican Party
218 seats
Republican Party
27 seats
Scotus is 6 Republicans.
Potus is Republican
basically Americas have had enough of Tyranny and Hitler and decided to vote for someone that is for Democracy and Freedom and that person is President Donald J Trump. the 45th and 47th President of the United States of America.
MAGA
4
EVA
I'm a Democrat who disliked Harris personally more than I oppose many of Trump's policies. So I really can say I was neutral in this one.
But you can't say this was a resounding endorsement of Trump. So if 2% of women and blacks got off their fat asses and voted for Harris, the media would be babbling about a Harris "landslide".
most people disliked Harris which is why she lost. even though the liberal mainstream media said she was going to win. according to the numbers it was a resounding landslide for Trump and MAGA.
I assume you saw this right?
https://mapsontheweb.zoom-maps.com/post/766433390969946112/county-level-election-results-of-the-2024-us
dems would have better off not cheating and letting Trump win in 2020. then Joe and Kamala or Kamala and someone else could have ran for Pres in 2024 and more than likely would have won. but unfortunately dems are spiteful people and couldnt see the bigger picture.
unfortunately, dems will do everything they can for the next 4 years to make sure Trump fails. Joe is escalating the war in Ukraine 2 months before Trump takes over. who does that?
Most people disliked both candidates. Yes, Harris was an incredibly weak candidate, but even at that, she came within 2% of winning. Any other Democrat would have won.
As a Dem there are two reasons I did not hold my breath and vote for her:
1) She was appointed the nominee and earned not a single primary vote. The Democratic Convention was ready to assemble and it was a spit in the face of democracy that they weren't allowed to do their job and choose the candidate.
2) Her endorsement by Dick Cheney sealed the deal that she was to continue the Neo-Con war machine and get us embroiled in even more foreign debacles.
Yes, the map reflects the fact that Democrats are concentrated in urban areas and Republicans dominate sparsely populated rural areas.
But that doesn't mean an urban voter is any less important.
The Republican doesn't need to win the popular vote to win in the Electoral College. However, if the Democrat loses the popular vote by even a scant 2%, they will lose the Electoral College.
No way.
Do you live in California?
He would win California and New York.
Sanctuary cities, wokeism, etc. All the while he lives in comfort from inherited wealth. I do count him out.
Newsom generally holds the same views as Kamala Harris. They're both from California and they're both in the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Harris won 48% of the vote, and she did that as a rather inept candidate with personality issues which rubbed voters the wrong way.
Newson is a smooth character and a dynamic white male with none of Harris's personal negatives. If Harris garnered 48%, it's only logical to assume that Newson would have won more. It could have been enough to tip the balance in swing states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.
If Harris garnered 48%, it's only logical to assume that Newson would have won more. It could have been enough to tip the balance in swing states like
I suspect that's right. share