MovieChat Forums > Thomas Matthew Crooks Discussion > Probably wasn't even the actual shooter....

Probably wasn't even the actual shooter...


Look at him. He's clearly not all there. Groomed by some fed fuck to be a patsy.

reply

Some questions I have. And no I am not what you might call a 'liberal'...

Despite it being 10 days since the event, we still have no confirmed narrative timeline of events. This is a red flag in itself

We have no motive for the shooter or any real confirmed information that doesn't conflict somewhere.

We have multiple reports of negligence, people reporting what appeared to be a shooter on a roof. We only got one picture of this, and still no timeline of events. How many shots? Is it 8 or 9? Why was the scene washed down? No real investigation seems to be happening.. Let's be honest

The the head of the SS has resigned after being put in front of Congress, in what can only be described as a political posturing event - no accountability or answers given - lots of pressure from Democrats on gun rhetoric... Not much actual substance from rebublicans

The nature of the information coming out is conflicting - two shooters? Iranian involvement (clear motive for false flag given this post rhetoric) water tower? Shooter in the crowd? Trump not being protected? If it was real, wouldn't the SS have acted differently? Wouldn't trump not be defending such a gross incompetence with more vigilance and worry?

Information from Trump himself doesn't match up to what we saw. He says there was a lot of blood on his hand when he first touches his ear. However, we never see this, and when he emerged, there was clearly no blood on his hand/fist, shoulder, arm etc. This is despite he himself asserting that the ear is one of the most bloody places to hit.

What we saw, doesn't match up with what we are being told

Then there is the crowd, and the number of people who seemed to act without worry or fear, merely with an intent to document proceedings

Note, we have not seen this footage from these people

Then we have the motive.... Trump is now a hero figure, republicans unite, the shot heard around the world, he dodged a bullet, he took a bullet for democracy, etc. A potential figure

reply

Exactly. So much sus stuff surrounds this.

reply

Then there is the crowd, and the number of people who seemed to act without worry or fear, merely with an intent to document proceedings


So a couple of hundred people knew in advance that a fake assassination was going to happen to benefit Trump, and ALL of them are keeping it a secret? And Trump trusted all of them to keep quiet? Even while other people in the crowd got wounded or killed as well?

OK.

And are you implying that there was no bullet and Trump somehow applied fake blood to his ear?

Sorry. This was a genuine attempt on Trump's life. I don't know if this Crooks kid was a real lone nut, or if he was some kind of patsy working for a larger group, but no way this was a fake, staged attack.

reply

And are you implying that there was no bullet and Trump somehow applied fake blood to his ear?


They're still trying to figure out if it was Heinz or Hunt's. So far the results are inconclusive.

reply

Maybe you should volunteer to taste his ear and find out.

reply

Reminds me of the 1970s thriller "The Parallax View" with Warren Beatty. It's about a journalist investigating this secret indoctrination program for political assassins that he discovers. In the film, The Parallax Corporation ALWAYS used a real assassin to do the actual job, and had a hapless patsy present at the assassination to take the fall and be considered the "Lone Nut" for the history books.

reply

Sounds cool. I'll give it a watch.

reply

Stop getting your "facts" from Twitter and Tucker!

reply

So have you caught up with the rest of us yet or are you still waiting for the MSM to update you?

reply

So the Secret Service agents who saw Crooks firing at Trump and then killed him, were in on it?

reply

We don't know who killed him based on what has been released.

If you've looked at what happened and don't have a hundred questions, then your critical thinking skills need to be worked on.

reply

I have lots of questions. Asking questions on this forum, is very unlikely to get me any rational answers at all.

So, do you think the Secret Service agents who saw Crooks firing at Trump and then killed him, were in on it?

reply

Again, I don't believe it's been confirmed who exactly killed him and what department they're from. The guys on the roof with the bolt guns didn't make the kill shots.

We already know there was minimal SS presence there. We know the SS/HS ignored advice leaving that building unguarded. So no, it's not beyond the realms of possibility that the SS were in on it, yes.

reply


Probably wasn't even the actual shooter...


Well, that would be unfortunate considering they popped his skull like a melon.

OTOH, the little prick was on top of a building aiming a gun at a crowd of people and a former President - if it was all "innocent" he deserved to be popped anyway.

reply

The government doesn't care about that sort of thing. He fulfilled his role. Gave everyone a face and a name to blame.

It's easy to manipulate people. Especially those with learning difficulties.

reply

It was Oswald. He didn't really die in Dallas in 1963. The CIA has kept him in protection for over six decades, in case they needed him again. He probably missed the shot because he's eighty-four years old, and his hands aren't as steady as they used to be.

reply


Finally someone making sense!!

reply

Nah. The CIA tied up that loose end.

reply

Speaking "of one of those crazy conspiracy theorists."

reply

I see you haven't been paying attention to the JFK situation...

reply

Demented Donald is furious that the choreographers did not provide more fake blood for his "ear injury."

reply

Ah ha. You're not serious? You're one of those crazy conspiracy theorists?

reply