MovieChat Forums > Thomas Matthew Crooks Discussion > Had he tried it on Biden he would be a h...

Had he tried it on Biden he would be a hero to the right.


Like George Zimmerman and Kyle Rittenhouse.

Don't bother denying it.

reply

what drugs have you taken tonight?

reply

Your mother's milk.

reply

[deleted]

And Biden would have been too slow to get out of the way.

reply

Republicans don’t want people dead , murdered or assassinated!
That’s a democrat thing…

reply

Not a single Republican has rioted over the attempted assassination and criminal levels of "negligence" that led to it. Yet a single drug-addicted felon dies of an OD in custody, who has a violent past of pointing guns at pregnant women during armed robberies, and leftists literally conduct krystalnacht in every major US city over months. They terrorized locals, killed multiple people, caused literally billions of dollars of damage to small businesses and their own neighbors.

reply

You riot over elections!

reply

You people rioted over the 2016 election and even sent death threats to Trump electors to try to overturn it. Don't deny it.

reply

Those riots had nothing to do with leftists or rightists.
They could have been 100% Trumpers for all you know.

J6 rioters on the other hand - were definately 100% Magas doing DJT's bidding.

reply

And Thomas Matthew Crooks was doing Brandon and Cackling Kamala's bidding. Cackling Kamala is still trying to have President Trump assassinated, I just saw an ad where she is continuing to peddle the same lies and conspiracy theories about President Trump being a "threat to democracy" or whatever her talking points are. It's just a matter of time before someone takes her seriously again and someone gets hurt, and I hope I am wrong.

reply

exactly....... the left wingers have BLM and Antifa leading the way, with their demonic violence

reply

Last time I checked, we're not seeing Republicans taking people out like the Trump Deranged Democrats

reply

…but this guy was literally a republican? Hello???

reply

He was NOT a Republican, he registered to get closer to Trump but donated to the Progressive Party:

"On January 20, 2021, at the age of 17, he donated $15 to the Progressive Turnout Project, a liberal voter turnout group, through the Democratic Party donation platform ActBlue.[11][16][18][44] His donation was made the same day that President Biden was sworn into office.[10] According to the Progressive Turnout Project, he made the donation in response to an email about "tuning into" the inauguration; he was unsubscribed from the group's mailing list in 2022.[43]"

Please do your research before you post so you don't look foolish

reply

Even if Demented Joe is now the worst President I have seen in my lifetime I would not want such a thing to happen. America would burn as enough people are dumb enough to buy into the garbage that would be spun by the Mainstream Media.

reply


People on the right know that an assassination of a president makes them a martyr.

reply

There would be no one on the left trying to duplicate Joe Biden if the same thing happened to him. He would simply be replaced which they're trying to do right now with Kamala.

reply

Both Zimmerman and Rittenhouse acted in self defense. Not to mention that there is zero evidence of what you claimed in your OP.

You are further proof that the Democrat Party has become the party of False Equivalences.

reply

I'll give you Rittenhouse acted in self-defense...but Zimmerman?! Pfffft! Please.

So you're telling me this: If you, Bob, were followed by a man who had a gun, a man who was told by 9/11 to stop following you, while you were out unarmed on a walk... And all we know for certain after that is that the person who was following you ended up with a couple bruises and you were shot dead...that we should all blame Bob for this incident and say the guy who followed and shot you acted in self-defense?!?! Really Bob? You're gonna blame the victim, yourself, on that one? Come on...quit being a partisan for two seconds and think about it. How do you follow an unarmed man and then shoot him and then claim self-defense? Only a right-wing jury, which Zimmerman clearly had, could have possibly returned a not-guilty verdict.

I think if Travon were a loved one of yours, you just might have a slightly different view of the case. No? You'd blame them still? You'd blame your son in this scenario and not the stalker/shooter? Only people who are, well, let's just say highly versed in right-wing propaganda, could believe such a nonsensical story.

reply

Travon was the one who initiated the physical altercation and tried to kill Zimmerman. Even if someone is following you you don't get to just kill them, you find a phone and call the police. In self defense you never get to make the first move.

I probably would feel different if Travon was a loved one of mine but that wouldn't change the facts, nor the fact that the entire Democrat establishment lied about the incident saying "Travon was hunted down like a rabid dog" and that he was killed for wearing a hoodie. George Zimmerman seriously should have sued some people. MSDNC even deceptively edited the 911 call to make it sound like he called Travon out for being black which he didn't.

reply

If you...were followed by a man who had a gun


If I knew the man had a gun, I would continue on my way looking for a place hide or escape even though I carry. Trayvon Martin did NOT know Zimmerman was armed. I'm sure if he did, he would have kept going.


, a man who was told by 9/11 to stop following you,


Immaterial. I would not have known he was told to stop following me.

And all we know for certain... .


Well, that's glossing over the facts a bit.

after that is that the person who was following you ended up with a couple bruises and you were shot dead..


There's where the facts get glossed over by the "all we know". We know more than that. We know that Zimmerman stopped following Martin at some point and returned to his car. We know that Trayvon Martin came up behind Zimmerman as Zimmerman went back to his car and then attacked him. Martin punched Zimmerman in the face breaking his nose and then had Zimmerman down on the ground pounding his head into the pavement while Zimmerman screamed for help. Medical reports back up the broken nose and lacerations on the back of Zimmerman's skull up as does an eye witness account of what happened. Does Zimmerman wait until his skull collapses or suffers a brain hemorrhage before firing?

It was a tragedy that didn't need to happen - both made bad choices, but Martin didn't need to approach Zimmerman after Zimmerman stopped following him, and Zimmerman was clearly a gung-ho neighborhood watchman in a community that suffered many break-ins who didn't need to follow Martin

reply

Zimmerman was being assaulted. Rittenhouse was defending himself against thugs who were trying to kill him. There is no similarity between either of them and Crooks.

reply

People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

reply