MovieChat Forums > Russell Brand Discussion > Russell Brand Accused Of Sexual Assault ...

Russell Brand Accused Of Sexual Assault On Set Of ‘Arthur’; Film Extra Names Warner Bros In Suit

posted a year ago by Satan2016 (25525)
24 replies | jump to latest

I notice the incel scum are still defending this pervert. It's indisputable that he exposed himself on several sets. Great that his comedy tour was cancelled. It's all part of the "grand conspiracy"!

https://deadline.com/2023/11/russell-brand-accused-sexual-assault-extra-film-set-arthur-1235593079/

Russell Brand has been accused of sexual assault by a film extra during the making of his 2010 comedy Arthur.

The BBC reports that the British presenter is the subject of a civil lawsuit filed Friday in the New York Supreme Court.

In her affidavit, the complainant – referred to as Jane Doe – alleged that Brand, who played the title role in the film, had “appeared intoxicated, smelled of alcohol, and was carrying a bottle of vodka on set” before the assault on July 7 2010.

She claimed that he exposed himself in full view of the cast and crew, before he followed her into a bathroom and assaulted her as “a member of production crew guarded the door from outside.”

[–] almonigal (1283) a year ago

So he was waving his dick around. And ?
Are you stressing yourself about every guy who has a bigger dixk than you?

[–] [deleted] a year ago

It's a crime to do so.

Do you think men should be going around exposing themselves to whomever they please? Keep that same energy when it's yourself or your parents/partner/children/siblings/friends having some weirdo flashing his junk at them.

[–] tom8 (3119) a year ago

Was it recorded on video?

Otherwise it's just a accusation/dream/made up story.

[–] Kowalski (75537) a year ago

WHAT A GUILTY CREEPER THING TO SAY.

[–] tom8 (3119) a year ago

so if a accuse you, kowalski, of being a pedophile, everyone should believe me?

[–] Kowalski (75537) a year ago

NO...AS IT IS FALSE...BUT...IF YOU GO TO THE AUTHORITIES...THEY WILL HANDLE IT FOR YOU.

[–] tom8 (3119) a year ago

exactly...... and what will they want?
evidence!

do you understand it now!?

[–] Kowalski (75537) a year ago

[–] tom8 (2688) a month ago
Was it recorded on video?

[–] tom8 (3119) a year ago

was brand's rapes recorded on video?

[–] Corbell (10995) a year ago

Why the 13 year wait?

[–] tom8 (3119) a year ago

because it's all lies and bullshit :-)

[–] Satan2016 (25525) a year ago

Does NOT have to be recorded! Many witness at BBC saw him exposing himself.

[–] tom8 (3119) a year ago

so what..... this is not what the charges are.

[–] [deleted] a year ago

MAGA clowns, 'go woke go broke' muppets, incels and conspiracy theorists are all the same people.

They'll defend someone like Russell Brand (who they consider one of their own) to the death but on the other hand want someone innocent like Rachel Zegler cancelled. They're vermin who form teams and you're either with them or against them.

Brand has had murmurs of misconduct surrounding him for years, he has took legal action to supress accusations from coming out for years now. But yes. It's all a big conspiracy. The evil woke lizard people are trying to cancel poor little Brand because he's outing their evil plans for world domination.

[–] almonigal (1283) a year ago

Who the fuck is racher zegler?

[–] [deleted] a year ago

An actress who is the new boogeywoman for the alt-right weirdos. She's part of the tri-fecta alongside Brie Larson and Kathleen Kennedy. 'Go woke go broke' youtubers are always bashing these three.

Her crimes;
- being non-white and getting cast as Snow White
- being pro trans rights
- finding the original Snow White movie (which is now 86 years old!) to be dated
- having a bad attitude/being annoying/insert generic 'I just don't like her' here

These are all cancelable offences! Whilst a man who is accused of sexual misconduct by many people must be protected at all costs!

[–] blue1981 (7755) a year ago

Maybe the world would be a better place if more appreciation was given to fairy tales and not rewritten because the woman falls for a prince. Oh the horror.

[–] emori (3661) a year ago

They just ridicule her because:
- she is performative woke. And they hate that.
- shits on the classical movie she was hired to be in. Basically saying it needs woke treatment. People always hate when actors do that.

Same with Brie Larson. And they hate Kathleen Kennedy because she made new Star Wars woke. Being "performative woke" is the only reason they hate those three.

None of them hate Daisy Ridley or Kristen Stewart for example. Despite them being shitty actresses in shitty movies. Because they are not "woke in everyone's faces". They don't hate Melissa McCartney. They don't hate Angelina Jolie. They don't hate Zendaya. They don't hate Jennifer Lopez. They don't hate Lupita Nyong'o.

[–] LoveCatsHateDogs (1942) a year ago

"they hate Kathleen Kennedy because she made new Star Wars woke"

Woke and shit. Not just woke.

[–] tom8 (3119) a year ago

exactly

[–] tom8 (3119) a year ago

"She's part of the tri-fecta alongside Brie Larson and Kathleen Kennedy"

maybe it's because the stuff they produce is pure shit, could that be the reason why?

"Whilst a man who is accused of sexual misconduct by many people must be protected at all costs!"

and there you have it you stupid moron... the words "accused "
because there is no evidence! LOL

it's hard for a left wing nutjob as you to comprehend, but try anyway.
-
left wingers like you have NO power anymore, woke shows and movies are flopping left and right, and your overweight and green/blue/purple haired ass can't handle it 😅

[–] blue1981 (7755) a year ago

She's a midget who's Mexican appropriating a role meant for a white actress in Snow White.

[–] emori (3661) a year ago

They should "Danny Masterson" him. That pig should go to jail.

[–] beavis (3249) a year ago

i hope he isn't as bad as danny, he'll have his day in court