Oh wait...
She did not have a gun, a knife, a bat, a club, or a chain and yet it's OK to gun her down. Hmmm. Funny how the rules are different.
Should've just complied.
Beautiful day today!
It is just so entertaining when keyboard commanders spout off about things they know nothing about. Just like this OP.
Pick up a law book...or, just GOOGLE laws....
Got any "law books" you can recommend?
The fact you see nothing wrong here says a lot...
The fact that you are defending a person that did what she did says even more.
Try Black's Law Dictionary to start, then move on to DC's criminal code. Or, just google "assault" and "aggravated assault" (which she most likely met the elements of the offense and probably even more offenses).
Ha. You think she was guilty of assault?
Sounds like you're the one that needs a dictionary.
At the least, she was clearly guilty of assault.
This is your one chance to show you can be a sincere poster and someone worth even responding to and if you can't do that, then it's the ignore list for you.
The legal definition of assault is when a person is in reasonable apprehension of a battery. Battery is the physical act.
So you tell me if this does not meet the criteria of assault - if a person is behind a locked heavy door and an unauthorized person is breaking down that door and breaking glass all to make entry, and where it is reasonable to assume for a person to make entry through that locked door and glass that some sort of weapon or tool (a tool that can be used as a weapon) is being used, then is it not reasonable to believe that the person behind that door may find him or herself in reasonable apprehension of receiving a battery?
Or do you think the person breaking down the door and breaking the glass is just doing it to sell girl scout cookies or just say hello?
To further illustrate, now imagine that there is not one person doing this, but a huge crowd. Adding this most likely adds to the criminal offenses, which would also mean the inclusion of something like a "mob action" offense and those are typically felonies.
Either answer with a sincere and truthful reply because if you don't or can't, you are not even worth conversing with and are going on ignore.
I think you're mistaking me for someone that gives a fuck about your shitty opinion.
shareOK I looked it up on Google.
Assault is defined as a physical attack onto another person.
What Ash did was more like trespassing.
Here is an interesting read of another past incident AB did where she threatened someone with her vehicle but did not get an assault charge for it.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/ashli-babbitt-jan-6-insurrectionist-portrayed-as-martyr-by-some-had-violent-past
But it's okay for Rittenhouse to gun down two people on a public street because they posed serious danger to him by moving towards him.
shareAre you retarded or what? One of the guys admitted in court, Kyle only shot him when he pointed his handgun at him trying to murder him. Straight from the mouth of the would be murderer. You can go and watch it on YouTube.
How do you fancy your chances unarmed against a guy hitting you around the head with skateboard? Spoiler alert, you'd die. In that instance, the skateboard was a lethal weapon justifying lethal force.
As for the bald paedo, he made it very clear he was going after Kyle to hurt him. But who's going to mourn the loss of a sick paedo fuck? Oh wait, vile lefties.
Yet another moron ignorant to the facts that have been available right from the start. Rittenhouse didn't even fire the first shots that night, he was in fear for his life and entirely within his rights to defend himself, as determined by the extensive televised trial that you obviously did not watch.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/ap-wisconsin-kenosha-kyle-rittenhouse-antioch-b2046017.html
https://eu.jsonline.com/story/news/crime/2020/10/15/kenosha-protester-charged-firing-gun-prior-rittenhouse-shots/3667399001/
https://www.tmj4.com/news/local-news/trial-begins-for-man-accused-of-firing-gun-during-rittenhouse-shooting
https://www.cbs58.com/news/man-charged-with-firing-warning-shot-before-rittenhouse-shootings-re-arrested