One brave young man defending himself...
...and one threatening serial child sodomyist.
Guess whose side the Democrats are on?
...and one threatening serial child sodomyist.
Guess whose side the Democrats are on?
What side is the pussy grabbing repub on??
shareThe one who is able to grasp the simple dynamics of natural sexuality.
shareThere are "no gay monkeys" then????
No "gay" otters, and deer.... what about hamsters???
"Natural Sexuality"... lol... have you seen what Stormy said about spanking that tub of lard????!
"Natural..." was it natural for that congressman to be looking for gay sex in the airport bathroom?
Was it exemplary of NATURAL or a respect for the SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE when donald duck cheated on all his wives.... and when Newt Gingrich did... were you not sensitive to the plight of NATURAL SEXUAL DYNAMICS then?!
To each his own, brother. Make peace with that because you will never find peace relegating what OTHER people do behind closed doors.
Wow, deflect much???
sharePussy grabbing is morally superior to child sodomy
shareBoth are repulsive, morally reprehensible, and come from weak, little "men".
I understand the other points i've made about the hypocrites on the right are meant to be IGNORED, but NOWHERE in my posts did I ever defend "child sodomy".
Nice try though.
Wow! The lunatic leftists brought up orange man bad in the very first post on a completely unrelated topic. Typical.
share[deleted]
What do your incoherent ramblings have to do with the OP?
shareFAIR ENOUGH...BUT LIKE THE ASTRO PHYSICS BOOKS READING LITTLE GIRL CUTOUT FROM THE TRAINING SCENE IN MEN IN BLACK...WHAT WAS THAT KID DOING OUT THERE AT THAT TIME WITH THAT GUN TO BEGIN WITH....LOOKING TO START SOME SHIT.
shareNope, he was looking to stop some shit that others were prone to start. And they did. And then he did. And then they attacked him ...
shareA 17 YEAR OLD KID WITH A HIGH POWERED RIFLE ALONE IN THE MIDDLE OF A RIOT?
I DO NOT FOR ONE SECOND BELIEVE HE IS GUILTY OF MURDER...BUT COME ON...THIS KID HAD THE JONES TO FIND A CIRCUMSTANCE TO NECESSITATE PULLING HIS TRIGGER.
Uh!Uh! Sorry to say you have it backwards my Pollack pal. The kid *didn’t* look for a circumstance…they found him (plural). Now think about this, in all 3 instances he was *running away* from those circumstances. And I’m happy he had the jones and wit to pull the trigger. Rosenbaum needed to die. He was a worthless pos child molester. Good riddance!
Now I ask you a question. Wisconsin is an open carry state. I happen to find myself in a riot while my firearm is visible. All hell is breaking loose! The looting, burning, etc. is supposedly being done by humans but more like savage dogs doing the wreckage. There’s a gun shot somewhere. All of a sudden the rioting no account thugs notice I have a firearm. They come after me, throwing projectiles at me, attempting to take my weapon. You are saying I don’t have a self-defense right to shoot the bastards?
I RETURN TO WHY WAS THIS 17 YEAR OLD KID THERE WITH AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO BEGIN WITH?...I FEEL NO REMORSE FOR THE DEAD NOR HATRED FOR THE KID...I JUST FIND HIS ACTIONS PRE SCUFFLE TO BE HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE.
share#1…An AR-15 is not an assault rifle. It’s a semi-automatic firearm which is the same as semi-automatic handguns. My Taurus .380 handgun is the same as the AR-15.
#2…He was asked to help guard the Car Source businesses just as owners did during the Rodney King riots.
#3…What actions did he take other than putting out fires which royally pissed off pedophile Rosenbaum. The kid didn’t do anything which warranted attacks against him.
#2…He was asked to help guard the Car Source businesses just as owners did during the Rodney King riots.
NO HE WASN'T...HE WAS A CHILD ON A STRANGE STREET.
I LIKE GUNS,I DON'T MIND SHOOTING ASSHOLES,THIS KID SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN THERE...BUT HE WAS...LET HIM OFF...BUT HE AND I BOTH KNOW WHY HE WAS THERE...SAME REASON I WOULD HAVE BEEN AT THAT AGE...AND IT ISN'T VERY FLATTERING.
Maybe he shouldn’t have, but I think he handled himself correctly. You forget he’s the age of military recruits. I have a feeling he would best a lot of them. He handled his gun correctly. He respected it, knowing it was a deadly weapon. He had sense of mind to keep it in his possession. He didn’t aim it unless it was necessary.
shareThat's not even relevant. In truth, if democrat leaders had done their job in putting down the riots, it wouldn't have been necessary. So if we're gonna play coulda, woulda, shoulda, let's go to the root.
shareOOOH REALLY...DEM DEMS HUH?...EXCUSE ME WHILE I PLEASURE MYELF WITH THE TEARS OF THINE ENEMY.
shareWhat it comes down to is this character Scorpeus sides with a pedophile who rapes little boys. Of course he had to bring Trump into the mix. By deviating from the OP he was able to avoid defending Rosenbaum which he wanted to do. Maybe has the same proclivities!? Hmm?🤔
shareThat asshat Doggielemming sock made it to the ignore list after 1 post.
shareHmmmmmmmm I’m going to take a shot and guess the side of lawlessness, rape, pedophilia, racism?
shareDon't forget the violence and scare tactics specific to fascists and nazis. And terrorists ... riots, burnings, violence, beatings, killings ... the whole spectrum.
Intimidating and threatening jurors ... this is the kind of justice that the leftists want ...
You know, the more of these events occur and you putting them into perspective …they do have shades of NAZI Germany.
shareAbsolutely! They've spent the last five years accusing conservatives of being fascists, all the while acting just like fascists. It's like they're going through the Nazi playbook one page at a time.
shareFor months I’ve been referring to Antifa as the new “Brown Shirts”. Their name is an oxymoron due to their jackbooted thug tactics. BLM is also an oxymoron. Apparently not in Chicago! The only times they matter is when Whitey is involved.
shareExactly! But any focus on black on black crime doesn't fit the agenda. We have to focus on racial strife that's somebody else's fault.
share