Who’s uglier?


Rachel Zegler or Kamala Harris? Discuss.

reply

Who's more joyful?

reply

Neither one is ugly.

reply

To a blind man.

reply

Harris is. No such thing as a hot sixty year old and if you see a photo of her not caked in makeup and photoshopped... Even when she was young, she was just average looking.

Zegler has foot-in-mouthitis, but she is objectively attractive.

reply

If you're into bushy brows and wide-set eyes.

Also, please define "objectively".

reply

She has features research identifies as attractive. wide-set eyes are a feature of attractive females. as is a symmetrical face, full lips, small nose, clear skin. She also, typically wears her hair long, which isn't backed by research, but is a personal preference of mine.

* oh, and a fit toned body. Can't forget that.

reply

You can’t truly judge a woman until you’ve seen her stark naked and soaking wet.

Which one would look better that way?

23yo Zegler or 60yo Harris?

reply

I choose Tim Walz.

reply

Hey. Whatever jiggles your johnson.

reply

You're ugliest where it matters most, on the inside.

/points to the heart

reply

That’s because I was in a car accident at the age of nineteen that damaged my birth heart, which was then removed to make way for a transplanted pig heart. It may be ugly, but it functions surprisingly well.

reply

wtf, RZ is goddess level

reply

I feel like you guys are putting me on. Her chin is so sharp that you’d cut your scrotum on it, plus it looks like she’d reek of salt and vinegar potato chips (kettle cooked, of course).

reply

You must be a fat, lonely, ugly loser.

reply

I weigh 97 pounds and am by all accounts a very sexy gender-fluid.

reply

Can’t go wrong with a spicy Latina like Rachel Zegler

reply

Better wear a rubber, bro.

reply

I find both quite attractive but I’m a slut.

reply