returning the offer to pose for Playboy magazine

This message has been deleted by the poster

This message has been deleted by an administrator

This message has been deleted by an administrator

Sarah has too much class and is way too grounded to trade on her looks that way. I think she'd prefer to be admired for her talent rather than for her body. These days, a lot of women cheapen themselves by showing off everything and they forget that retaining mystery and leaving something to the imagination can be a whole lot sexier than posing nude.

Good for her!! She is beautiful but this just shows that she has brains too. It's one thing to do that for an actually movie part I guess...but just to sell pictures of your body like that is not something women should do! :)

You sound gay.

nudity is not beauty you horny shmucks...
Yeah, that sounds gay.

j/k

Seriously, it's all in the context. If you were married to her and she came into the bedroom nude, you would see the beauty in it.

If you love Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it copy this and make your signature!

nudity is not beauty you horny shmucks
I'm going to make it more specific for all the people criticising that statement. Nudity in magazines, especially with the purpose of objectification, is not beauty. I lose a lot of respect for women who pose in those magazines just to be ogled at by a bunch of horny men, as though it would help their cause as a woman. A woman can absolutely remain beautiful without posing in trashy magazines, and Callies is proof of that. The only people who defend nudity in magazines are males who love jerking off. You don't admire their beauty. You love the fantasies that develop from seeing them nude. If you did admire their beauty you would have no problem with their clothes staying on, because beauty is not only evident when a woman's naked.


I only do it with superheroes.