What a joke the Oscars are. How can a non talent actress like Stewart land a nomination while someone of Emma's caliber has yet to do so?
shareEh, I wouldn’t put much stock in the Oscars anyway. It is not like Watson has been doing a lot of movies either.
sharetrue, but whether the movies are good or bad, someone has to win. Oscars are pretty much a joke now a days.
shareWatson is a mediocre actress at best, just like Stewart. Taking long breaks like Watson is going to make it difficult to maintain voters attention.
shareNo way is Emma a mediocre actress, she is way more talented than Stewart
shareSorry, but she isn't. Name a standout performance? She doesn't have one. She's a decent actress, but just like people delude themselves into thinking she's the most beautiful actress, they also over evaluate her talent.
shareShe is the most beautiful, there is a reason she won the celebrity battle for having the most beautiful face.
Blin Ring and Perks of being a Wallflower blow anything Stewart has done out of the water.
Sure, ok dude. I'm hardly a Stewart fan, but to think Watson is in any way better is comical.
shareLMAO...I LIKE EMMA WATSON...BUT COME ON...KRISTEN STEWART IS A MUCH MORE TALENTED ACTOR...SHE HAS BEEN WORKING LONGER AND MORE CONSISTANTLY TOO.
shareStewart more talented than Watson???? lol that’s a good joke.
shareI LOVE EMMA...BUT COME ON....HER RESUME IS WEAK AS SHIT COMPARED TO STEWARTS.
shareWeak? There is nothing on Stewart’s filmography on the level of Blin Ring and Perks of being a Wallflower. She has more films but that’s about it. Quality over quantity.
shareTHAT IS PATENTLY INCORRECT...THOSE FILMS YOU LISTED ARE BOTH GOOD BUT MEDIOCRE AT BEST AND SUPPORTING ROLES FOR WATSON,NOT LEADS...STEWART ON THE OTHER HAND ALREADY HAD THE CAKEEATERS AND SPEAK UNDER HER BELT BEFORE SHE EVEN MET TWILIGHT.
shareHow are they supporting roles when she is the star and focus of the movie? It doesn't matters if Stewart had those roles when nobody cares or remembers said movies. Watson was iconic int he Bling Ring and Wallflower is a highlight role in her career. Nevermind HP and Beauty and the Beast. Stewart is just an indie actress, Watson is a true movie star.
shareLMAO...REAL WORDS NOW...BLING RING IS NOT GOOD AND WALLFLOWER IS OK AT BEST...BOTH ARE SUPPRTING ROLES FOR WATSON...STEWART HAS MULTIPLE FILMS ON HER RESUME THAT ILLUSTRATE THE DIVISION BETWEEN HER AND WATSON....THE FILM "SPEAK" IS AMAZING AND STEWART'S ROLE IN IT IS ENOUGH ALL ON IT'S OWN TO DEFEAT THE ENTIRETY OF WATSON'S WORK...
DO US A FAVOR...BEFORE YOU GET A BONER AND GET ALL JUMPY OVER AN ACTRESS...WATCH SOME FILMS...THAT WAY YOU DON'T SOUND LIKE A COMPLETE MORON WITH A HARD-ON LEECHING THE FUNCTIONALITY OF YOUR BRAIN.
Oh so you're an Anti-Stewart troll too. Good to know that you have no account for taste, culture, or even art.