..after being supposedly nicked by a bullet only a few weeks ago?
Even if he had plastic surgery, an 80 year old ear would still have visible bruising and likely wouldn't have the bandage removed for weeks after. Especially a wound that supposedly needed a bandage the size of the one Trump was parading himself in the few days after he was "shot".
A photograph of Trump taken in the last few days shows that he has zero signs of ever being shot in the ear.
From NY Magazine. Trump's doctor was also President Obama's doctor.
"This is, of course, part of the legend. When Dr. Ronny Jackson, the White House physician for Barack Obama and then for Trump, described the injury. The wound was “kind of a half-moon shape,” he told me. “There was nothing to stitch.” The bullet had “scooped” a small amount of “skin and fat” off the top of the ear. (By which he did not mean to imply that Trump has especially fat ears. “Everybody has fat and skin on top of their ears,” he said. “He’s got good ears.”)
Jackson admitted he was responsible for the funny-looking bandage Trump sported at the Republican National Convention. Because the ear was inflamed and easily irritated, and because irritation caused it to start bleeding again, and because the shape of any ear makes it unwieldy to dress, his solution was to apply antibiotic ointment, then gauze to absorb blood, and then he secured the whole system with the envelopelike bandage that inspired so much derision and a brief niche fashion craze. “I thought that was pretty cool … I should’ve patented it,” he said. “I’m an emergency medical physician. I’m not a nurse,” he added. “I did the best I could.”
Edit: It will have been two months on 13 September.
He supposedly got shot in the ear. A bullet going at supersonic speed made contact with it. And it produced "Lots and lots of of blood" according to Trump.
And didn't Donald have the bandage changed more than once in the following days? Can't use the "Whoops. I'm just a doctor." excuse for those.
The only thing that you can conclude from that is that the doctor how saw old Donald's ear (who knows when) treated a tiny wound that produced lots and lots of blood and somehow left no scar on the geriatric patient.
So are you incapable of the "critical thinking" for which you ask? The world saw video of the blood. Was it a squib that just happened to kill a firefighter?
Let's stick to the ear and 80 year old Donald's miraculous wound, rather than drag the actual victim into this. I never made any insinuation about the shooting not taking place.
Try and have a little respect for the dead please. And I don't mean that weird, creepy charade that Donald put on, dancing with the dead man's clothes.
Well, normally you consider yourself one of, if not THE most brilliant mind here, so it's only fair to ask what exactly the idea behind these mysterious questions you're posing is. Do you think Trump has access to the holy grail which gives him instant self healing abilities? Or is it all some big cOnspIrAcy....
WTF are you talking about? When the hell have I stated anything about my mind? It's all the "libertarian" edgelords who constantly brag about their discerning brains and aversion to official stories meant to placate people who don't think critically.
Yes I'm sure there's a perfectly reasonable and obvious explanation for why 80yo Trump has shown no sign of being shot in the ear with the bullet of an assassin's rifle.
I'd like to hear people's thoughts. The thoughts of the self declared critical thinkers.
Are you doubting that he was nicked with a bullet or are you asking how someone who has been nicked with a bullet can show no signs of damage?
If it is the first choice, then I would say that FBI director Wray said that Trump was hit by a bullet along with Obama's former doctor who also confirmed that Trump was hit by a bullet.
If it is the 2nd choice, then could you provide a link to a post assassination attempt photo of a close up of his ear? I looked up that have claimed to be recent but all are older photos claiming to be recent.
There is video of him returning by plane from a Wisconsin rally yesterday and eating ice cream.
If an 80yo person looking like him pointed to his ear and told you he'd been shot there a few weeks ago, you'd react with suitable incredulity.
You'd think that a guy who was seemingly so elated and visibly proud of the assassination attempt would have had the wound photographed immediately for propaganda purposes.
I'll ask again....Are you doubting that he was nicked with a bullet or are you asking how someone who has been nicked with a bullet can show no signs of damage?
And once again, if you're saying there is no damage, please provide a link to a recent photo.
lol, I know the feeling. my brain has been hurting since Trump won in Nov 2016. up is down and down is up.
but seriously. the deep state was purporting a grand lie by saying there was nothing wrong with Joe and age was just a number. if the debate had never happened then its possible Joe would be pres again.
also dont forget that elections cant be stolen but they can be stolen and will be stolen and might be stolen again, but they cant be stolen. your welcome...
I had heard he wasn't actually shot in the ear. Reports afterward said his ear came in contact with the podium as the agent pushed him to the ground which is what caused the injury.
Well shots rang out and President Trump grabbed his ear. He himself then goes to the ground followed by agents getting on top. From his position, his right ear would have been away from the podium.
As far as reports of his ear hitting the podium....I can't find anything on that. Do you have any possible links?
Obama's former Doctor also said that President Trump was shot with a bullet.
FBI Director Wray said that President Trump was shot with a bullet.
Do you think that Corey Comperatore was shot with a bullet that day?