MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > You May Hate Trump, But At Least He’s Co...

You May Hate Trump, But At Least He’s Consistent With Foot In Mouth! Not So With Kackling Kamala!

posted 3 months ago by kspkap (13555)
19 replies | jump to latest

With Trump…what you see and hear…is what you get. It stays the same.

With Kackling Kamala…who knows what you’ll see and hear. She changes everyday…akin to a chameleon. She plays to whatever audience she’s speaking. It’s a Democrat thing. They all do it because they are the epitome of phoniness and lies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BXd3bhcJJ4

For Kackling Kamala voters: You truly want this nitwit in the Oval Office? She’s one brick shy of a load!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACfFCaMiv2c

Someone needs to ask her if “The Cloud” above us which stores our files shuts down when it rains. 🤭

Also, can any of you voters for the nitwit answer this question: How are young families feeding their families since Biden & Kackling Kamala took office? How are those at the cusp of the Middle Class feeding their families? How are the Elderly getting by? How are they affording the day to day living expenses!?

Gas prices from 2018-2024:

https://www.finder.com/economics/gas-prices

Food prices from 2018-2024:

https://www.in2013dollars.com/Food/price-inflation/2018-to-2024

I choose to vote for the devil I know…TRUMP! As I wrote “What you see and hear…is what you get!” And, it was damn good before Covid 19 was intentionally released.

[–] robocat893 (15918) 3 months ago

You sure make a lot of excuses for Trump. Explain exactly why you will vote for a 34 times convicted felon who is way too old to be president with his cognitive skills declining rapidly. Have you seen Trump lately? He's not doing well. You should get used to saying "Madam President" because it's coming as there are just not enough of you morons left to reelect Trump in November.

Just so you know the Democrats didn't release the COVID-19 virus which killed millions of people around the world just to make Trump look bad. That's just absurd. But I don't expect much from you since you claimed that you get all your news from the MovieChat political forum.

[–] moviechatterer (15583) 3 months ago

I liked it in the 60s when Kennedy & Nixon were in - did u see those gas prices ?

[–] Bubbathegut (18047) 3 months ago

I like when Trump was President and gas was $1.50 and there was no inflation and no new wars. Good times.

[–] Information-Police (4889) 3 months ago

Gas prices are the same as they were exactly 4 years ago

[–] Bubbathegut (18047) 3 months ago

Why doesnt Joe lower the prices with BBB? Or is Joe still blaming Putin for high gas prices and inflation?

[–] Information-Police (4889) 3 months ago

Dude, inflation was a worldwide issue and it has been brought back down, and more rapidly than in other countries. Not that the ostentatious can do much to affect that. They have no power to lower prices, unless you favor a socialist rationalization of industry.

However, a president can do things to increase inflation, and one of the biggest ways they can do that is c imposing widespread tariffs, which is what Trump is planning to do.

[–] Information-Police (4889) 3 months ago

If you are just talking about lowering gas prices, the president has two tools and they are limited. Release oil from the strategic reserves which he has done and which Republicans bitch about. And alter regulations to show more petroleum production. This is a very limited tool because it takes on oil companies increasing capital in exploration and production. But us gas refiners decided they would rather not spend more money on production and to let prices rise so they can increase their profits. This is documented in communications to shareholders. Still, ourv production is higher than ius ever been
But, maybe you want to nationalize the petroleum industry?

[–] Information-Police (4889) 3 months ago

[–] Narwhale37 (1226) 3 months ago

"He's OPEN about sending a false slate electors to the capital to end democracy so that means he deserves my vote"

Okay, but here's a question:What if there was things that were hidden about him anyways? Would you then not vote for him with that logic?

[–] kspkap (13555) 3 months ago

"He's OPEN about sending a false slate electors to the capital to end democracy so that means he deserves my vote"

Well, apparently you know about it. As I wrote what you see and hear is what you get. More than likely a liar, an egoist, he’s bombastic, etc. And…yes I will vote for him because all politicians are liars and cheats.

Today’s Democrats are all of the above. The difference is they get away with it. Hells Bells. We had a rapist in the Oval Office by the name of Clinton. One of the most crooked is Nancy Pelosi & hubby.

What’s the latest news to come out about Hunter Biden? The chickens are starting to come home to roost and they will lead right back to Daddy Joe.

At least Trump was wealthy before he took office. Not so with many who later find themselves rolling in the dough after being paid by the taxpayers. Also, Trump refused to take his Presidential salary. Only 2 other presidents refused…JFK & Herbert Hoover.

[–] Narwhale37 (1226) 3 months ago

You didn't address the other half of my post.

[–] kspkap (13555) 3 months ago

If I understood your rather confusing question, I believe I did “address the other half of your post” several times. If I wasn’t aware of “hidden things” how would that affect my vote? I’m sorry, but your question is nonsensical. Also, rephrase the latter part of your query. Instead of writing ”Would you then not vote for him with that logic? Delete not and rephrase it to ”Would you then vote for him with that logic?”

To answer your corrected question…your question isn’t logical. Once again if “things are hidden” how would I know about them?

I will vote for him over the nitwit socialist.

[–] robocat893 (15918) 3 months ago

Explain exactly why you will vote for a 34 times convicted felon who is way too old to be president with his dementia getting worse by the day. Your stupidity and gullibility is showing.

I don't expect much from you since you claimed that you get all your news from the MovieChat political forum.

[–] Jinx (3721) 3 months ago

Can you explain how she is a socialist?

[–] kspkap (13555) 3 months ago

Before I answer your question please see the following. Kackling Kamala is a dangerous pathological liar. Why is she dangerous? Because she’s a liar who believes her own lies and will act on them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkjB6DjSOV4

Socialist:

”The set of beliefs that states that all people are equal and should share equally in a country's money, or the political systems based on these beliefs.”

”A Socialist’s Case for Kamala Harris”

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/a-socialists-case-for-kamala-harris.html

” Kamala Harris’ economic ideas are failed socialist panderings”

”So far, the only policy statement from Kamala is that she is going to work on inflation by implementing price controls, a Marxist idea that has never worked. You can tell that, deep down, her economic knowledge is very shallow.

Che Guevara, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Castro, Mussolini, Putin and North Korea’s Kim Jung Un are some of the economic luminaries who employed price controls. More recently, President Maduro ruined Venezuela by putting in price controls to counter “parasitic bourgeoisie” capitalists. Vilifying capitalism is a shallow and pandering strategy always employed by the left. This is what Kamala is doing with her only stated economic plan to save us from the inflation the Democrats caused. Let’s call her “Che-mala.”

Kamala continues to shamelessly pander to a group of voters who do not understand economics and just want to be given something by others.

Tim Waltz visited Red China 30 times, more times than Dennis Rodman visited North Korea. Kamala was deemed the most liberal senator, beating out Bernie Sanders. They all seem to have a fascination with communist policies and their promises: free healthcare, medical care and education. Yet they fail to mention communism’s three epic failures for the people: Breakfast, lunch and dinner”

https://www.ocregister.com/2024/08/21/kamala-harris-economic-ideas-are-failed-socialist-panderings/

[–] kspkap (13555) 3 months ago

”Price Controls Were a Disaster in the 1970s. They Would Be a Disaster Today, Too.”

”With some pundits advocating for price controls to fight inflation, it suddenly feels like the 1970s again. This type of overbearing intervention has never worked as marketed, something President Richard Nixon discovered in 1973 when he lifted the wage and price controls he had implemented two years earlier.

Still, to those unwilling to learn from history, such controls will always seem sensible. Inflation amounts to rising prices, they say, so locking in prices is a supposed easy fix.”

https://reason.com/2022/02/03/price-controls-diaster-1970s-richard-nixon-joe-biden-economy/

[–] Narwhale37 (1226) 3 months ago

[deleted]

[–] Narwhale37 (1226) 3 months ago

[deleted]

[–] Narwhale37 (1226) 3 months ago

[deleted]

[–] Information-Police (4889) 3 months ago

Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down — you know, I was, somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that — because, look, child care is child care. It’s, couldn’t, you know, there’s something, you have to have it — in this country, you have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to — but they’ll get used to it very quickly — and it’s not gonna stop them from doing business with us. But they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country.Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care.

We’re gonna have — I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country, because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just, that I just told you about. We’re gonna be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in. We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people, but we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about Make America Great Again. We have to do it because right now we’re a failing nation, so we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.