Why did all 86 judges reject his claims of a stolen election?
I mean heck almost half them (38) were from his own party and some cases went to the Supreme Court. Every single judge threw out his claims, but why?
shareI mean heck almost half them (38) were from his own party and some cases went to the Supreme Court. Every single judge threw out his claims, but why?
shareRemember something, there are two types of Republicans in America: the ones who genuinely believe in what the party stands for, and the two-faced, turncoat slimes in Washington. The Republican judges mentioned either are RINO "never-Trumpers," were bribed under the table to throw out the cases, or their families were threatened.
Don't kid yourself if you think the Republicans in Washington are the same as the ones outside of Washington or other state capitals. Many are not to be trusted and are little better than Democraps in some cases.
You cannot be genuine trying to pass off this garbage.
shareSimple, the election wasn't stolen...And for the idiot Trumptwats who will reply "but...but...but...": Let's see the evidence once and for all, put up or shut up!
https://media.tenor.com/9-WAhyuQq30AAAAe/you-have-nothing-lavan-davis.png
Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 31 decided on the merits, and of those 31, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 23 of them.
Btw, those were only lawsuits for "optics." There has not been an "official investigation" for the 2020 election.
They rejected it because they didn't want to stir the pot and start potential civil unrest over it, so they just went with it because no way in hell did old man Joe get 81 Million votes, more than Obama for Christ sake and even Obama laughs at that
shareYeap, he had a choice to make, reveal it all or risk a possible civil war.
share[–] tvfan (6110) 16 hours agoThat what you said is indeed true. DJT had a clear choice. The propaganda, marketing, false narrative, bogus data, reams of false "information" DJT decided would never hold up in a court of law and his inferior but highly paid attorneys warned him of that.
Yeap, he had a choice to make, reveal it all or risk a possible civil war.
Because there was nothing there, and his two million dollar research groups attested to that.
Trump pulled a 180 today and said the election was LONG OVER before J6.
So really, give it up, you've all been conned by the master!
Normie Answer: "Because there was no credible, actionable evidence of wide spread voter fraud."
Trumpist Answer: "Deep State, man. Deep fuckin' State!"
It never ceases to amaze me how many tropes and talking ponts the MAGA Right have borrowed from 60s Radical Left - with a few Right-wing and/or Dundamentalist tweaks, of course. It's no coincidence that some of Trump's most die-hard supporters are 60s Era Boomers. It's almost as if they're reliving their youth, just swapping left for right. They lurched too far left in their youth and are now lurching too far right in their old age.
probably cuz all those judges are on epsteins creep list
share